Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 What about the difference in size between Oswald and Lovelady? The Dallas Police weighed and measured Oswald and found him to be 5'9" 131 pounds. That is thin. I am 5'6" 142 pounds, and people think I look thin. If you look at his earlier photos, you can see that Oswald lost a lot of weight.

Lovelady wasn't weighed and measured by the FBI until February 29, 1964, so over 3 months later, and they said he was 5'8" 170 pounds. But he, for sure, lost weight after the assassination because he was under so much stress. And you can see in his FBI photos that his pants look baggy on him.

But, going by those numbers, Lovelady was an inch shorter and 39 pounds heavier than Oswald. Shouldn't that show in the images? But, can't you see that Doorman and Oswald look to be the exact same size and weight? They look identical. How could this be an image of two men who had a weight difference of almost 40 pounds?

So, no weight or size difference, the exact same set of clothes, plus the clothes are worn the same way, with the shirt unbuttoned and sprawled open, the same gaunt face, the same facial features...how could it not be the same guy? And no Doorman's shirt is not plaid. Look at the upper right side of Doorman's shirt, which is on our left, including his collar. I superimposed an image of Lovelady's posing shirt to show you what plaid looks like. Doorman's shirt is not plaid. The weird contrast it has is due to haze, distortion, and light reflection.

No rational person can deny that Doorman was Oswald because he looks like him; he's dressed like him; and he is sized right to be him. It is insane to deny it.