Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 I know it is daunting for people when they hear, for the first time, that Jack Ruby was innocent. But, if it was Ruby in that garage shooting at Oswald, then the images of Ruby have to be consistent with the Shooter. They have to match. It’s as simple as that, and nothing else matters.  It doesn’t matter what anybody said- including Ruby.

With that thought in mind, I have made a new collage comparing Ruby to the Shooter. The image of Ruby on the left is one of his mug-shot photos from that day. The image of the Shooter is from the Beers photo.

If there are any physical differences between them, that settles it; he wasn’t Ruby.  One difference is that the Shooter was shorter than Ruby. Ruby was 5’9”.  It was on his driver’s license. That was the same height as Oswald. But, you can see in the Beers photo that the Shooter was quite a bit shorter than Oswald. In fact, he looks almost like a Munchkin.

They tried to hide it by changing the Shooter’s left leg, to make it look like he was stretched out and squatting, thereby lowering him. But, that is fake.   You can see in the Jackson photo that his legs were underneath him; he wasn’t all stretched out.  You can see it in the films too.

Another difference that stands out is that the Shooter had a very short neck. He had one of the shortest necks I have ever seen, and I was a chiropractor.  It’s almost like his head was sitting on his shoulders. Ruby, on the left, clearly has a longer neck than the Shooter.

Another thing that stands out is that the Shooter had a very round head. He was like Charlie Brown.  You can see that Ruby had a longer head. The shape of their heads is nothing alike.

The other thing is that they wore different shoes and sock. Ruby wore jet black socks, while the Shooter wore light socks. We don’t know what color they were because it’s a black and white photo, but they were light.  Also, the Shooter is wearing dressy wingtips, while Ruby wore a high-top shoe. When this was discovered, they had to make it that they changed every stitch of clothing on his body, including his shoes and socks. But, that is ridiculous because it was a City Jail. A defendant only stays there until they are arraigned. Then, they either go home or to the County Jail. And the Constitution guarantees a speedy arraignment.  So, they don’t provide any clothes at a City Jail. Oswald didn’t get any. Yet, we are supposed to believe that they changed everything on Ruby, including his underwear. He was transferred to the County Jail the very next day.

So, the truth is that Ruby wore black socks and high-top shoes, while the Shooter wore light socks  and wingtips, and that is just what happened.

Jack Ruby was innocent. He was tricked into believing that he shot Oswald. He got  to the garage an hour before, and they pounced on him then.

Now, if you were standing somewhere, minding your own business, and the cops jumped you and dragged you off somewhere and told you that you shot someone, you would defend yourself. You would respond with fury! And that’s normal, in that situation. But, Jack Ruby wasn’t normal.  He was extremely impaired mentally, and partly due to drugs. He was so weak, so submissive, and so pathologically respectful of authority, that he accepted that he shot Oswald just because the lying Dallas Police told him that he did. To put it succinctly: Jack Ruby was MK-ULTRA’d.

So, here is the collage, and it is screaming at us that Jack Ruby was innocent.  Never mind anything else. This alone proves that he was innocent.