Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

  I have been on PubMed reading about nerve agents being absorbed percutaneous: through the skin. It happens even with intact skin, and that's why decontamination involves such intense and prolonged scrubbing and irrigating. But what about when nerve agents are introduced by violent entry through the skin? Then, the effects are much more severe, and much more rapid. 

This is from an AI search engine. 

If a nerve agent is injected or driven directly into the skin (or deeper tissues)—rather than just sitting on the surface—the onset is typically much faster and more severe.

Why injection changes everything

Normal skin exposure requires the chemical to slowly diffuse through layers of skin before reaching the bloodstream. Injection bypasses that barrier and places the agent:

• Directly into subcutaneous tissue or muscle, or
• Potentially into blood vessels

This makes absorption far more rapid and efficient.

Expected speed of symptoms

The timing depends on depth and dose, but broadly:

• Direct bloodstream entry (intravenous-like):
  Symptoms can begin within seconds to under a minute, similar to fast inhalation exposure.
• Intramuscular or subcutaneous injection:
  Symptoms may appear very quickly (often within a minute).

 JFK was shot in the back, high on the hill, with an ice dart that contained a nerve agent. We are hampered in studying it because we don't know which nerve agent it was, and we also don't know what, if any, other toxins were included.  

It is something that only could have been done by the CIA and the DOD (that is, the DOW in the age of Trump). No criminal organization could have done it. It could only have been done by the government. And everything about it would have been top-secret. 

And it must have taken a long time; years. That's because it was totally unchartered territory that required extensive experimentation. I dread to think how they went about that; who the subjects were, and what the casualty rate was.  It was used on Kennedy in 1963, but, I strongly suspect and have to assume that it was started 10 years before. 

In Kennedy's case, they wanted his muscles to seize up to immobilize him physically, and they also wanted his mind incapacitated, including his ability to speak. Kennedy never said a word. Jackie said he didn't say a word. And he didn't try to say a word. And that was due to his mind. 

Just think: JFK was shot, and he took no action to respond to the situation. He just sat there and did nothing. He did respond to being shot in the throat, but that was an instinctual response, not a reflex. And after he cleared his airway obstruction by coughing, he went to being totally passive. He didn't engage in action, and there is no reason to think that he engaged in thought either. He was completely incapacitated mentally. That is why he didn't talk; he didn't respond to Jackie: and he didn't take any action to cope with the situation.  And I think it's fair to say that, prior to that, he was a very smart, perceptive, and quick thinking person. 

We owe a lot to Senator Church for bringing to light that the CIA did develop a gun with which to shoot nerve agents into people. People make fun of the idea, but they ignore the fact that CIA Director William Colby said that the gun worked, that it was a "serious weapon." 

For 51 years, people have been ignoring the fact that the Zapruder film shows JFK being totally deranged mentally, totally incapable of communicating in any way, and in a state of progressive muscular spasm. I say 51 years because it wasn't until 1975 that the Zapruder film was first shown to the public.  It was surely the result of poisoning, including a nerve agent. No other explanation is possible, and it will be recognized.