Let's continue with out examination of MO photos. Find that mole!

 Real or impostor? Let's hone in.

I'd say there is definitely a mole there- unless you think an artifact just happened to occur at that spot. So, this is the Marguerite impostor. 

And notice that she's wearing a nurse's uniform. And why not? She was a private duty nurse. But, this picture tells us something: the Marguerite impostor was always short, but she wasn't always fat. 

Here's another thing: she had thick hair with a lot of body. The real Marguerite didn't. Her hair was thin- even when she was young.

In the top right picture, you can't see much of her hair because of the hat, but if she had big thick hair, could she she be wearing that hat? Could she get it all in there?

So, the really thick, full-bodied hair goes with the MO impostor not the real one.

These two are both definitely the impostor, but the date on the right can't be right. The date on the left is (1942) and that's because the larger picture includes 3 year old LHO. He has his back to us, but he looks about 3.

It's from Beyond Conspiracy, the 2003 ABC Program hosted by Peter Jennings. So, that's 1942, but how could the other be 1943?

She is obviously younger on the right, so it had to be before 1942. So, why would they say 1943? It's because of the age difference between the real Marguerite and the impostor. The impostor was older. She was born in the 19th century. In 1943, the real MO was 36 years old. That woman looks about 36, but the year was probably about 1936. They had to fudge with the dates in order to accomplish the ruse. Those two are both the LHO impostor for sure. 

Robert Oswald has a very strong Texas drawl. I've lived in Texas since 1978, so I'm very familiar with it. And no, I didn't pick it up myself. Here he is. Listen to that twang. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DVQgFeUiuM

But, the Lee Harvey Oswald we know didn't have a Texas drawl at all. He sounded nothing like Robert. I'd call his an East Coast accent. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4FDDuRSgzFk


What about his mother? Like Lee, she had no Texas drawl. None. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXTo7RM0_ac


So, what gives? How did Robert Oswald acquire such a thick Texas drawl when his alleged mother didn't speak that way? And however he got it, how come Lee didn't get it when he grew up in the same household? 

They weren't brothers. And Robert Oswald was not the son of the Marguerite Oswald of fame. 

So, the Marguerite of fame definitely had a mole below her right eye.

But, the other Marguerite did not. 

So, that give us something to look for. What about this one?

Let's blow it up.

I'd say there is a mole there. If you had to say yah or nah, wouldn't you say yah? So, that makes her the impostor. We're going to keep going with this.

This is weird. The Marguerite of fame liked to loop her M. Nice little flourish. I don't believe I have ever seen that before. 

And she did it in 1935 when she wrote a love note to her 1 year old son Robert, who was born in 1934. You see how that loop is the same? How many people do that? It can't be too many. 

However, we've got other samples of the cursive handwriting of Marguerite. Here is a letter she wrote to her son John Pic.

Notice on the right that she didn't loop the M in Mother. You could say that maybe she didn't do it every time, but she did it in 1935 and then again 40 years later, so that suggests an ingrained habit to me. Also, John Armstrong notes that when t was the last letter in a word, she didn't lift the pen to cross the t. Rather, she just swerved left with a flourish. But, you don't see that on the left. And compare the making of y. On the right, it's very broad and almost box-like. On the left, it looks like a normal y. 

So, who signed that photo for Robert? I suspect it was the Marguerite of fame, and not the real Marguerite who wrote the letter to Pic. 

This is the uncropped picture of Marguerite outside Paul's Shoe Store in Ft. Worth in 1957. Notice her height. We know that the Marguerite of fame was a very short woman, like 5'1". Maybe even just 5'0". This woman is definitely not that short. 

 If that's the short Marguerite of fame, then look at the woman to her right (our left). She would have to be 4'9".  Take a good look at that and notice how not-short Marguerite looks. Amongst others, she does not look short. But, the Marguerite Oswald of fame always looked short amongst others. 

Recently, Mark O'Blazney tried to claim on McAdams' forum that that he never said Oswald did it, that he's waiting for the release of documents in 2017 to make up his mind. Til then, he's straddling the fence. 

Well, that's a lie. He's been saying that Oswald is guilty for a long time. I just found this comment he entered on a blog:

O'Blase, if he didn't miss JFK it means he hit him. It means that you are saying that he hit him. 

So, his recent denial is just a bold-faced lie from a shit-faced liar. Guys like O'Blase' just lie whenever it seems advantageous to do so. And it wouldn't be hard for me to find other statements of O'Blase's showing his contempt for Oswald and his saying he's guilty. 

Robert Oswald reportedly said that the person on the right is his mother, and the one on the left is unknown, perhaps one of her sisters. But that is ridiculous. The year was 1922, so Marguerite Claverie would have been 15 years old. Which one of these looks to be a 15 year old girl?

The one on the left is his mother, and the one on the right is either her mother or perhaps an aunt. They do look very much alike. But, that is definitely his mother on the left. I'm calling you a liar, Robert Oswald.