• Mick Tappe But Ruby knew about Oswald to spread propaganda at the Press Conference & enough about him to want him dead ?

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 14m
• 

  Ralph Cinque Mick, don't confuse the reported scenario with what actually happened and what we know actually happened. Ruby admitted going to the Police Station on Friday evening. He did not go on Friday afternoon. He said he didn't, including on a polygraph test which he passed. And we have phone records which prove that he was on the phone talking to his sister at 2 PM when he was supposedly stalking Oswald. So, don't believe all the stuff you hear. Now, about the Friday night press conference, Ruby went there to deliver sandwiches to the detectives. He was told they weren't interested. So, he got the idea to give them to the crew of a television or radio station that was covering the murder. So, Ruby went there Friday night with no thought or expectation of seeing Oswald or killing him. Was he even at the press conference? He never explicitly said that he was, and I suspect that he wasn't because the pictures of Ruby at the press conference don't look like him. He was definitely in the hall and in the vicinity, but I don't know that he ever went into the room. Look closely at this collage. On the right is Ruby at the PD on Friday evening, in the hall. It was very late. Actually, it was already early Saturday morning. On the left is supposedly Ruby at the press conference, but can you see that that is a much younger man? And I mean 20 years younger. And remember: the people telling you all that stuff about Ruby are the people who killed Kennedy. And I'll tell you that the people who killed Kennedy are the same people who killed Oswald.

Hoyt Kelley Poor Jacob Rubinstein ... just another persecuted innocent jew.

How was your imbecilic victim ... seen in New Orleans with his buddy Lee Harvey Oswald ... before the assassination?

Many a slip ... twixt a cup and a lip.

Try again ... this time don't leave out pertinent details.

• Like
•  · Reply
•  · 33m

• 

  Ralph Cinque Oswald was never seen with Ruby. You, apparently, don't know the difference between a claim and a fact. Anybody can claim anything. Ruby and Oswald never met. If you say otherwise, you are just repeating a falsehood. And, Ruby may have been targeted for this because he was Jewish. And he was a very devout Jew. Devout enough to rule out any possibility that he would shoot Oswald. He had a strong moral compass. He chastised himself for making an illegal turn- and it wasn't even illegal. He was enamored with the Dallas Police. He was like a groupie to them. There is a greater chance that the likes of you shot Oswald than Ruby did. He was innocent. He showed up at the garage about an hour before the spectacle. He was pounced upon by police and dragged up to the 5th floor where he was told that he shot Oswald. And he believed them because they were the Dallas Police, and he worshiped them. And that's where he was at 11:20 when it was showtime for the theatrical spectacle starring James Bookhout as Jack Ruby. Oh, and by the way, I'm making you famous.

  • Like
  •  · Reply
  •  · 1m

Why should anyone accept the lighting in the limo in the Altgens photo? Why would Kennedy and Connally be all light-up but Kellerman obscured in dark shadow?

It wasn't that way at other times. This is from Main Street, which has the same orientation to the sun as Elm. 

The image of Kennedy in the Altgens photo is fake. He was NOT yet shot in the throat at the time of the Altgens photo. There isn't a snowball's chance in Hell that he was shot in the neck already by then. The Altgens photo was taken when the limo was high on the hill. It was nowhere near the point where he was shot in the throat. He may have been shot in the back already and probably was. But, definitely not the throat. 

There was a relatively long time in which JFK was shot only in the back and reacting to it. But, all of it was cut out of the Zapruder film. And they doctored the Altgens photo to create the illusion that it corresponds to Zapruder 255. The truth is that the Altgens photo does not correspond to ANY Zapruder frame.  It goes with the part of the film that was extracted and destroyed. 

Jeffrey Epstein is back in the news with the arrest of his girlfriend, but do you realize that there are parallels between the his suicide and Oswald's murder?

But first, note that incredulity about Epstein's suicide is so great, it is probably the #1 Conspiracy Theory in the world. People were predicting it and making jokes about it before it even happened. They were making videos about it- and they were funny. 

So, Epstein was facing trial in which he could have done colossal damage to important and powerful people, such as Bill Clinton, Bill Richardson, Alan Dershowitz, Prince Andrew, etc.- all vacationers on the Lolita Express to Orgy Island. And that's why he needed to be killed.

Well, Oswald was also facing trial, and he could have, and would have, done tremendous and colossal damage to the Dallas Police and the FBI, and ultimately, to all those who really killed Kennedy, including LBJ. Oswald would have been able to persuasively prove that he did not own a rifle, that the documentation produced by the FBI, purporting to show that he mail-ordered a rifle from Chicago, was phony. It was as phony as three dollar bill. And that genie would have been out of the bottle, and there would have been no putting it back. Oswald would have been able to prove persuasively that it was him in the Altgens photo, and that things were done to the photo to deliberately, maliciously, and criminally obscure that fact. Tampering with evidence is a crime.  He would have been able to prove that he never had a P.O. Box and that he never wrote a letter to Marina concerning the Walker shooting. He would have been able to destroy the claim that he went to Mexico City.  And so on, and so on. And remember that his lawyers would have been able to get their experts to testify on the print evidence and the fibers in the butt of the rifle. All of the alleged evidence against him would have been challenged and destroyed.  His lawyer or lawyers would have decimated the prosecution. 

And, I dare say that  there would have been a lot more at stake than whether some big shots indulged on Orgy Island. At stake would have been: everything- the future of the republic.   Because: as I have told you, if Oswald didn't do it, it's not as though authorities could pin it on some other lone-nut. And, they couldn't blame the Mafia either, as the HSCA did in 1979 because the Mafia story is linked to Oswald. The story went that the Mafia, in deciding to kill Kennedy, settled on an ex-Marine who had just spent 3 years building radios in Russia, and since then worked a bevy of odd jobs in Dallas and New Orleans, none of which had anything to do with shooting or assassination. It was ridiculous and absurd, but how could they blame the Mafia for a phony order-form proffered by the FBI? 

So, Oswald needed killing fast, and the clock was ticking. How much longer could they deny him a lawyer? I figure they had until the next day, Monday. If they didn't get him a lawyer by Monday, it would have been obvious to the whole world that they were violating his rights. 

So, then what happened? Did they just get lucky that Jack Ruby came along and killed him? A lot of people doubt that. They would rather think that they set it up for Ruby to kill him. But, how do you get a guy, to not just kill somebody, but to utterly and totally destroy his own life? Who would do that? Nobody would do that. And when I say nobody, I mean absolutely nobody. 

In The Godfather, the Corleone family got some guy to confess to the killing of the police chief, which enabled Michael to return to America from Sicily. But, they paid the guy an enormous sum of money, which went to his family. In this case, there was no money involved. When you ask the people who believe that Ruby did it, why he did it, they will usually say that it was because of threats; that they threatened to kill his sister unless he killed Oswald. Have you got a sister? If someone threatened to kill her unless you killed someone who they wanted dead, would you do it?  Of course, you wouldn't. Nobody would. And I don't even know if anyone would do the thing that happened in The Godfather. Remember, it's fiction. But, it's not as wild a fiction as the official story of the Oswald shooting or the alternative story. 

Doesn't it bother you that the Oswald shooting just happened to take place on national television at prime time? Doesn't it bother you that the face of the shooter never got captured during the spectacle, that we never got a good look at him? Doesn't it bother you that after the most intense security precautions in the history of police work that Oswald should get shot just seconds after walking out a door into a police garage and in a sea of police? The attached photo is of Dallas Police manning the phones because of all the death threats to Oswald coming in. They announced it on the radio Sunday morning that they were being inundated with threatening phone calls. 

Doesn't it bother you that Dallas Police responded to a violent and armed man not by handcuffing him but by taking him somewhere? 

If you don't believe the official story of what happened to Jeffrey Epstein, you've got reasons in spades not to believe the official story of what happened to Lee Harvey Oswald. And the truth is NOT that that they conspired with Ruby to get Ruby to kill him. The truth is that they manipulated the feeble-minded Ruby TO THINK that he killed him.  And I am hoping that you are sharp-minded enough to realize it. Jack Ruby was innocent. The shooter in the garage was the short FBI agent, James W. Bookhout. That is a fact, and it is as certain as the sun will rise in the east tomorrow and set in the west. 
  

My Stretch of Texas Ground has won a very unusual and distinctive award at the Austria International Film Festival: Best Humanitarian Feature. I greatly appreciate it. It truly was the idea behind the film, that there really is just one race, the human race, and violence among humans has got to stop.

Slavery was a monstrous, despicable, abominable evil. I know that. But, George Washington was more directly involved, and more monstrously involved in the practice of that evil than Robert E. Lee ever was.Therefore, if we are going to tear down statues of Lee, we need to do the same to Washington. That's all I'm saying. Don't condemn Lee and make excuses for Washington.

John Daley Are you saying Robert Lee was lesser of the evil?

• Like
  
•  · Reply
•  · 3h

• 

  Ralph Cinque John, it's the hypocrisy that gets me. Lincoln could have freed all the slaves in Maryland, Delaware, Kentucky, and Missouri, but he didn't. Why do people keep celebrating the Emancipation Proclamation when it was vacuous, when it didn't free a single slave? And, that empty proclamation wasn't even made until nearly 2 years into the Civil War. The 13th Amendment didn't pass the Senate until April 1864, and it didn't pass the House until December 1864, which was just a few months before the Civil War ended. But yes, if Lee is going to be denounced then Washington needs to be denounced in spades because of the two of them, Washington enslaved people to a much greater extent than Lee did, and Washington is known to have committed atrocities against slaves, such as extracting their teeth. How do you forgive that? How do you make excuses for it?

  • Like
    
  •  · Reply
  •  · 1m