Robin Unger posted this frame from the Towner film. For some reason, there is a brown horizontal streak across the middle of her face. Why is that, Robin? 

Let's take a look at it up-close:

Don't ask me to explain it; you're the one who put it up. And do you see that white thing atop her head? I'll put an arrow to it.

That, believe it or not, is supposed to be her hand waving at the President. But, as you can see, it isn't even orthopedically possible. Think about what you'd have to do with your arm to get your hand there. 

Unger also offered this frame:

Here, her face looks cleaner. You don't see that streak marring it. But, you certainly see the artificiality of the Woman and Baby. Look how big her head is compared to the Fedora Hat Man- either one. Here she is close-up.

They aren't real, Unger. They are concocted techno images that were added to the film. Crude techno images. 

bpete, the Petite Woman was on the east side of the doorway; the Old Geezer was on the west side of the doorway; and Doorman was in the middle of the doorway on the top landing. 

That's all I have to say about it because that's the way it was, and you go to Hell. 

I just heard from John Armstrong. We had been discussing how many people described Lee Oswald as the biggest kid in the class, which can be easily seen in the 6th grade photo, where he looks precocious.

But, wasn't Harvey always a runt? This is how John Armstrong responded:

"Ralph- Dr. Hartogs, who spent time with Harvey at the Youth House in NYC, wrote in his book, 'He reminded me of a malnourished child refugee from WWII.' Those are not his exact words, but very close. I think Harvey was a WWII refugee, probably from Hungary, and grew up speaking Russian as a child. My thoughts were strengthened when I read about the woman from NYC who said that Oswald's father and uncle were Hungarians, spent most of their time on communistic activities, and lived near 77th & 2nd Avenue in Yorkville." (Note: Yorkville is a neighborhood in Manhattan on the Upper East Side.)

No JFK truther should feel OK about the Newseum shirt. They completely hid the very unique lay of Oswald's shirt. If it is the same shirt, then they starched the hell out of it and did other things to change the look of it. It was forensic evidence, and it is a crime to alter forensic evidence. 

Most shirts do not fold over the way Oswald's did, and there is no reason to think that the Newseum shirt did or would. That shirt on display was dis-info. They were sending you the subliminal message that Oswald's shirt was just an ordinary shirt, just like any in your closet. It was not.

This is the one clear frame from the Wiegman film, but it doesn't occur in the movie. You don't get to see it that good in action. They just delivered it to us that good as a still frame through their agent, Robin Unger. 

But, the fools should have realized that once they showed us that A frame existed of this clarity, it meant that they had it that good for the entire film- or at least the part in which Wiegman was riding slowly and steadily in the car.

And make no mistake: Wiegman was definitely still aboard the car at this point.  Don't listen to that Idiot Joseph Backes who thinks Wiegman was running in the street.  

But, you should also know that this clear frame was cropped. Here it is extracted from the film by me. 

So, they cropped it. They cropped it but were sure to leave Doorman in because that was the main point they were selling with the clear frame: that Doorman was still there, that he hadn't gone anywhere. 

But, he had gone somewhere. Oswald had already left for the lunch room at that point. There was no one standing in Doorman's spot. They put that Cigar Store Indian in there to make it look like Doorman was still there. He wasn't standing like that at a time like that; nobody would. The Idiot Backes says that he had already begun the mourning process for Kennedy. Idiot. Idiot. Idiot. 

But, what the heck is going on to the east of that implanted figure, the Cigar Store Indian? Why is it so blurry over there?  What was going on over there? Was there a commotion? Is that what caught Dave Wiegman's attention causing him to swing the camera around to do the second pan of the doorway? 

Well, whatever it was, they didn't want us to see it. They cut it out. They just wanted us to see Doorman, showing us that he was still there, standing arrow straight, unencumbered by the weight, of all those hustlers and their schemes; he stood proud; he stood tall; high above it all; he still believed in his dreams.

But, he wasn't there. He doesn't even look like the original Doorman. 

These were two different men.  The Doorman on the left was the real Doorman, and he was Lee Harvey Oswald. There is no telling who the guy on the right was, but I doubt it was Billy Lovelady. 

These Nazi propagandists are messing with our heads. Don't let them have sway over yours. 

  

I told you, dipshit, that you can't correlate every figure between the images. So, don't assume that you can. 

But, I'm glad you put that up because you really get the sense that Roy Lewis is leaning against that west column. He's not even standing in full support of himself. He's not only looking west; he's leaning west. So, how do you reconcile that with this?

You can't. And those two images were way too close in time to say that he moved. Bottom line: the image of Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo is a phony image. They put it in there. He was behind the white column, largely out of view to Altgens, and completely so once they were finished. They may have thought they could get away with it because they thought that Doorman was next to the column. Of course, he wasn't; he was in the center. It only looks that way because of the parallax effect. 

Hey, bpete: here are two figures we can correlate; at least, we know they are the same person. Yet, it's absolutely impossible for them to be so discordant. At least one of them has to be fake, and the one that definitely is fake is the one from Altgens. 

First, notice that she is east of Doorman. Doorman is in the center. He is on the top landing, and he is behind the median handrail. He is slightly to the west of it, but only inches off dead-center. I proved that in Dealey Plaza at the Altgens reenactment, but we can also see it in the Wiegman film. 

And yes, bpete, we can correlate the Altgens Doorman with the first Wiegman Doorman. Not the second one, but the first. 

It's not that nothing correlates between Altgens and Wiegman. It's that you can't make the assumption that everything correlates, that whatever you see in one can necessarily be found in the other.

So, Doorman was in the center and the petite little woman of Altgens was over on the east side. You know that's true because you can see the east corner behind her. 

So where was the Old Geezer in Wiegman? He was slightly west of Doorman and definitely west of the median handrail.

You know he is on the west side of the median handrail. He has to be. Doorman is essentially right behind it, and he is west of Doorman. You also know that the petite woman from Altgens is east of it.

So, the Old Geezer from Wiegman is in a different location than the Petite Woman from Altgens. And that's over and above the difference of one having a penis and the other a vagina.