Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 It's ironic that the official story of the JFK assassination depicts Oswald as insane, but the story itself is insane. It makes no sense. It has zero plausibility.

Oswald had no motive to kill Kennedy. There is clear evidence that he liked Kennedy. And he never once said a negative or critical thing about him.

Think about the motives that people have when they commit murder. There is hate, but Oswald didn't hate Kennedy. There's revenge. But, Oswald had nothing to feel revengeful about towards Kennedy. Kennedy had never done anything to him. There's material gain, such as acquiring money, but that didn't apply in this case. No money was going to come to Oswald if he killed Kennedy.

There's domestic relationships, such as marriages going bad. But, that has no application in this case.

There is silencing someone, but again: no application in this case.

When you get to the end, you realize that there was no motive for Oswald to kill Kennedy at all, and the one and only thing that could have propelled him to do it was insanity. And I have no doubt that the plotters realized that they had to depict Oswald as insane, as in psychotically violent. And that's why they invented the story that he shot at General Walker. Of course, he didn't. Again: Oswald did NOT own a rifle, and none of the particulars of the Walker case, as reported by the police, meshed with Oswald at all.

There is no way the idea of killing Kennedy could have entered Oswald's mind. JFK is the one who got us through the Cuban Missile Crisis without going to war with the Soviet Union, and think about how much Oswald and Marina appreciated that, considering her family over there, and the many friends they had there.

The bottom line is that there is no basis to assign such a heinous act of violence to Oswald except to say that he was insane. But, the irony is that the insanity was on the other side. It was the men who framed him and killed him who were insane.

For instance, Allen Dulles was insane. His willingness to commit murders, assassinations, and other crimes, such as his MK-ULTRA program, the whole CIA weaponizing of LSD, etc. which he rationalized as "nothing is off-limits when it comes to fighting Communism" is an insane thought because it was using an ideology to justify horrific acts that were clearly and obviously criminal to any rational mind.

However, I would not use the word insane to describe Lyndon Johnson. He was just plain evil, and if you haven't read LBJ: Mastermind by Phillip Nelson, you really should.

There are so many circumstances from November 22, 1963 that make it impossible for Oswald to have shot Kennedy: the fact that Oswald did not order or own a rifle; the fact that Oswald got to the 2nd floor lunch room in a way that could not have involved coming down from the 6th floor; the fact that he was in the doorway during the motorcade, and he cited someone else who was in the doorway, which he could have only known by being there himself (Bill Shelley), the fact that the whole homemade bag story makes no sense, starting with them showing us a bag that surely wasn't made in a garage with paper and tape.

The official story of the JFK assassination is nothing but a national fable. And, the entity that spread that fable, the U.S. government, was the real monstrous killer.

We have to fight the government's Big Lie about the JFK assassination because in doing so, we assert and defend our own sanity. And we have to do it simply because it's the right thing to do.