Look at this view of the overhead mic:

Now try to find it in this frame:

Of course, the Beers photo has the mic:

And, the Jackson photo does not:

Different takes with and without the mic = the whole thing was faked. 

This was just sent to me by a supporter, and it may be the very best view we have of the Oswald shooting.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LMSJF6Ezqz4&oref=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DLMSJF6Ezqz4&has_verified=1

Now, we know that the bullet went straight across Oswald's upper abdomen, through the ribcage, from left to right. But, you can plainly see that the Ruby impostor's trajectory was on a diagonal. 

Graves is alongside Oswald. "Ruby" is in front of him and to the side, in other words, at a diagonal. The doctors said that the bullet went straight across his abdomen from left to right, settling under the skin on the right ribcage. But, Ruby's bullet would have taken a distinctly diagonal course. 

However, the person who sent this film to me wanted me to notice that there was definitely no microphone hanging from the ceiling as we see in the Beers photo.

Greetings Mr. Cinque.

I recently watched episode no. 124 and think I heard you state that there may have been different takes of the shooting.

I may have mentioned this topic to you in an earlier e-mail but here it is again.

Notice the upper right hand portion of this video and you see that there is no overhead microphone until the 32 second mark and than again at the 1:16 mark.

There is also no ceiling microphone in the Bob Jackson photo. I don’t see how this is possible unless there were several different takes of the shooting.

Perhaps you could explore this topic in another show.

YYY

PS Particularly in the Bob Jackson photo, the gunman appears to be much heavier than Jack Ruby. He is built like a cigarette machine, way in contrast to the way Ruby appears in those clothes the DPD put him in. 

The Hughes Doorway is fake. Not the bus ride, not the cab ride, but the Hughes Doorway is fake. Look at Toni Glover. She's got her mother in front of her, you know. And I mean directly in front of her, where all she can see is her mother's back. Yet, she's doing a rousing wave? And JFK's limo isn't even in front of her yet. Toni (through her mother's back) is facing the doorway, but JFK's limo is still turning from Houston. So, who is she waving at, even theoretically? And then, you've got Doorman hovering right above Carl Jones next to the west wall. Doorman was white. Carl Jones was black. That didn't happen in 1963. It just didn't. And we know from the Wiegman film that Doorman was in the center of the doorway, far away from Carl Jones.

So, how could Doorman simultaneously be in the center of the doorway and also be next to the west wall hovering above Carl Jones? And if you are going to start saying that he was moving around that doorway during the shooting, don't bother. Remember who you are talking to. I don't tolerate that degree of stupidity. It is NOT plausible that he was moving around, relocating himself. And, if you are going to claim that he was Lovelady, Lovelady never claimed to do that. Lovelady was asked where he was during the shooting, and he said, "on your top level." He did not say, "first, I was hovering above Carl Jones next to the west wall, but then I moved to the top level." He just said he was on the top level. And the figure he was referring to was not Doorman, but rather, Black Hole Man.

Again: the Hughes Doorway is fake. It is another example of cinematic flim-flam of which the JFK assassination is rampant. And it was done for only one reason: to hide Oswald in the doorway. 

I didn't do anything to boost this, but look at how many views it got. 334, so far. You see, that tells me something. It tells me that this particular collage really resonates with people, that they are sharing it with people. And therefore, because of this result, I am going to include this collage in the packet that I send to President Trump.

How significant is it that James Bookhout sent a telegram to J. Edgar Hoover days before the assassination? Very. I don't know how big the FBI was in 1963, but this is from the FBI website:

"On February 29, 2012, a total of 35,664 people worked for the FBI, including 13,778 special agents and 21,886 professional staff."

I suspect that few agents and staffers communicated directly with J. Edgar Hoover. But, James Bookhout was one of them. 

Here is the rank structure within the FBI. James Bookhout was a Special Agent, but that is the second lowest rank, the lowest being Probationary Agent. 

• Field Agents
  • Probationary Agent
  • Special Agent
  • Senior Special Agent
  • Supervisory Special Agent
  • Assistant Special Agent-in-Charge (ASAC)
  • Special Agent-in-Charge (SAC)
• FBI Management
• Deputy Assistant Director
• Assistant Director
• Associate Executive Assistant Director
• Executive Assistant Director
• Associate Deputy Director
• Deputy Chief of Staff
• Chief of Staff and Special Counsel to the Director
• Deputy Director
• Director

So yes, it is a very big deal that Bookhout was telegramming Hoover. 

Joseph Backes, who is the most conspicuous false Oswald defender in the world, whose claim to fame is declaring that Oswald was framed for riding the bus and cab, a groaningly stupid contention, trashed the source book, Farewell America: The Plot to Kill JFK. It is actually, historically speaking, a very important book, coming out of French Intelligence in 1968 and having a huge impact at the time. It has earned an average of 4 1/2 stars out of 5 on Amazon. 

So, Bookhout and Hoover were telegramming days before the assassination, then who got assigned to be the FBI's eyes and ears during the processing of Oswald? Bookhout. Not Hosty. Bookhout. Hosty only attended the first interrogation; that's it. Bookhout attended most of them. The only person to attend more was Fritz. 

Did Oswald know Bookhout prior to the shooting? I suspect he did, and it's because of this:

Yes, that is Bookhout on the left, the short man in the Fedora hat to whom Oswald was talking, asking him, "What have you got against (something)?" Now, why was Oswald talking to one of his interrogators in the fucking hallway, for Christ's sake???? It was an adversarial situation, was it not? They tell you at the beginning that you don't have to talk if you don't want to, that anything you say, can and will be used against you in a court of law. But, Oswald was not only willing to talk, but was eager to talk to this guy in the hall. How could that degree of comfort and familiarity come about in 27 hours? Look at Oswald's expression. He looks like he's talking to a friend. We know that Oswald knew Hosty. Hosty denied that they had ever met, but Hosty went out to interview his wife, and Oswald went to the Dallas FBI expecting to see Hosty, and when told he wasn't there, he left him a note. He had Hosty's name and number in his address book. Again, Hosty denied that they had ever met, but we never heard from Oswald about it. There is no denying that they had a connection; their paths had crossed; and it would be incredibly stupid to rule out that they had met, that it's just another lie that they didn't. We know that when Oswald returned from Russia that he had more than one debriefing session with FBI agents in Dallas.  Did he meet Hosty then? But, the point is that Hosty, who already had a connection with Oswald, was chosen to face him at the DPD. So, was Bookhout chosen for the same reason because he already had an acquaintance with Oswald? This image says that he did. 

Look how they zeroed out Bookhout's face. They wiped out all his features. Why? Because he's God-damn Bookhout, that's why. But, this scene isn't normal. The situation isn't normal. Persons who are accused of double-murder don't strike up friendly conversations with their interrogators in the hallway. Or, is it really just a JFK thing? Because, as we all know, the JFK assassination happened in its own world, its own dimension, its own universe, where freaky, weird, wild, wacky stuff happened over and over and over again.  This is one of them. 

Hoover was in on it

by Ralph C. Cinque

We hear a lot about Lyndon Johnson being involved in the JFK assassination, that he didn't just cover it up, but that he had foreknowledge of it. On Elm Street, he ducked, leaving his wife in harm's way, and we can see it in the Altgens photo.  I've read three books about LBJ's involvement in the JFK assassination: one by Fred Newcombe, one by Barr McClennan, and one by Phil Nelson. But, there are others, for instance, Roger Stone's book, which I intend to read. 

So, that LBJ was involved in killing Kennedy is a widely held belief within the "community." However, what about J. Edgar Hoover? It's widely believed that he was involved in the cover-up, but what about the murder? Did Hoover have foreknowledge?

We've all heard the claim that Hoover attended the Clint Murchison party the night before the assassination, as reported by Madeleine Duncan Brown, LBJ's mistress. But naturally, it depends on the amount of credibility you give to Madeleine Brown.

But, even without that, I am inclined to believe, very strongly, that Hoover had foreknowledge, and I can tell you that from now on, I shall operate under that assumption.  Here's why:

First, Hoover was very close friends with Lyndon Johnson, and there is no reason to believe the Johnson would not have told him- even if no one else did. They were such close friends that LBJ's daughters called Hoover, Uncle Edgar. They were such close friends that when LBJ moved to Washington, he bought a house right next door to Hoover just so that they could be close. Once you realize that LBJ was involved, it follows like night follows day that he told Hoover. Of course he would have. Why the hell not? 

He had no reason not to, knowing as he did that Kennedy and Hoover were bitter enemies. In fact, if there was anyone alive he could trust to tell, it was Hoover. Hoover's animosity towards JFK went way back- to long before JFK became President. Back in the 30s when JFK was an ensign in the Navy and doing work with classified materials in Washington, he was having an affair with the beautiful German spy Ellen Rometsch and Hoover was alarmed. He had their meetings tape-recorded, and he took his concerns to the top. He was afraid that Kennedy was going to reveal state secrets in the pillow talk. And that's just one example. Kennedy's reckless philandering (and let's face it: it was that) really infuriated Hoover. JFK's affairs with Judyth Exner and with Marilyn Monroe enraged him. We know that Hoover bugged the home of Marilyn Monroe, and it was because of her involvement, sexual and otherwise, with both Kennedy brothers. Then, she was obviously murdered, but by whom? The leading candidate in my opinion is J. Edgar Hoover, and the only other one is Robert Kennedy. 

So, what reason would LBJ have had not to tell Uncle Edgar? There isn't any. Mandatory retirement due to age was bearing down on Hoover, and Kennedy was going to force him out. He wanted to get rid of Hoover. He wanted to get rid of Hoover worse than he wanted to get rid of Dulles. Of course, as President, LBJ reversed it all, issuing an Executive Order stating that Hoover could remain in power for as long as he wanted- until his death. And that's what happened.

Second, consider how fast Hoover responded with information about Oswald after the assassination. He was prepared. He was ready. He had it collected in advance. 

Third, Hoover received a telegram from James Bookhout just days before the assassination. The odds are great that it was about Kennedy's visit, but what about it? Kennedy's security was left mostly to the Dallas Police and the Secret Service. We have other internal memos and communications within the FBI, so why don't we have that one? Bookhout went on to become the Garage Shooter of Oswald, so that he was communicating directly with Hoover just a few days before looks strongly complicit.   

Fourth, it was J. Edgar Hoover who called Robert Kennedy to inform him that his brother was shot. Now, why would Hoover have been the one to do that if he wasn't involved? Don't you think it was something that was planned in advance?  

Fifth, Hoover was just too powerful not to tell him. He was arguably the most powerful person in the country, more powerful than the President. It was Hoover who controlled the media, not JFK. It was Hoover who had a vast network of spies and informants, not JFK. And Hoover had closer ties with the military, with other intelligence agencies, and with industrial tycoons than JFK. How could the plotters risk crossing Hoover? Or slighting him? All the reasons to believe that they couldn't do it without LBJ apply also to Hoover. The killing of Kennedy was an operation of the "national security state" according to Vincent Salandria. So, how does the national security state not include J. Edgar Hoover?

I don't say that Hoover was involved in the JFK assassination operationally. But, I don't believe he was caught by surprise on November 22.  He knew it was going to happen, and he knew who the patsy was. But, when it came to killing Oswald, he was involved operationally. The killing of Oswald was a joint operation of the Dallas Police and the FBI. And the FBI meant Hoover.  

In terms of killing Kennedy, Hoover has gotten off easy compared to LBJ, and that needs to stop. Hoover knew. And in knowing, he had blood on his hands. Anyone who thinks otherwise, needs to wake up. Hoover knew; he knew before it happened.  



  

Look at this gif from the Darnell film by Robin Unger. You see Baker running, and you see other people moving, but no one in the doorway is moving. They're all still. Perfectly still. I'm telling you: the Prayermanites do not have a prayer. That whole Darnell doorway is a pile of crap. Who was Prayer Man? NOBODY! You hear me? I said: NOBODY.