Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Once again, we were talking about the Woman and Baby from Towner vs. the Woman and Boy from Altgens, who are supposedly the same persons at the same time. 

It's something that demonstrates that the JFK assassination is a Bizarro World where stuff happens which could never happen anywhere else, not in any other context. Yet, it passes for normal in the JFK assassination. Why? Because it's the JFK assassination. 

Notice on the left that we don't see any arm going around the boy. Notice also that his back appears to be straight as an arrow; he is rising up as straight as a tree. Who's doing that? He is! His own postural muscles are doing it. But, what about on the right? That child isn't doing anything. There is no sign of anything postural going on.  

I ask you now to compare the ratio of the size of the boy's head on the left to his mother's head to the ratio of the size of the baby's head on the right to its mother's head. I've done it.

I have traced around the boy's head on the left to make sure you realize how big his head is, and then I indicated a ratio of 3 to 2, which means that his mother's head is 1 1/2 times bigger than his. And that's being generous to her. The ratio may be less than that. But, on the right, the mother's head is at least 3X bigger than the baby's.  

And that raises another issue that completely and totally destroys the legitimacy of the Towner baby. Here is an article on Livestrong entitled, "Why are Babies' Heads so large in proportion to their bodies?"

http://www.livestrong.com/article/506251-why-are-babies-heads-so-large-in-proportion-to-their-body-sizes/

"The brains of human newborns are no more than 25 percent of their full size. However, as this small fraction of a human brain is equivalent in size to that of an adult great ape, human heads are as large as possible at birth. Coupled with a body that is approximately 5 percent of its full size, the large head required to house a newborn's enormous brain results in human babies having heads that appear very large in relation to their bodies."

This is from UK Science site:

This is a very perceptive question. Babies heads are very big in proportion to their bodies because unlike the rest of the body the brain doesn’t grow very much as you grow up. By the age of two you have as many brain cells as you will have for the rest of your life. And there is a reason why.

The brain can’t grow like the rest of the body because if you added too many new cells to it that might disrupt the things you had already learned! So you have to have an almost full-sized brain right from the start. And a nearly full-size brain needs a nearly full sized head.. which makes their heads out of proportion to their bodies.

http://chlorinem11.imascientist.org.uk/2011/03/why-are-the-babies-heads-so-big

That came from a quick search, and I could keep going. But, I'll trust that people accept the established medical fact that babies have very big heads in proportion to their bodies. 

But, this ratio is absolutely impossible:

That is NOT a real baby. It would be a case of microcephaly if it was.  It's just some art that was added to the film by someone with a low sense of awareness about this. And the funny thing is that at the same time the artist made the baby's head freakishly small, he made the mother's head freakishly big.

Look at the size of the mother's head compared to her shoulders and her torso. It's huge! Yet, it's just sitting on top of her shoulders because SHE HAS NO NECK. 

The Towner Woman and Baby are not real. They are techno-art. They were added to the Towner film to substantiate the Woman and Boy in Altgens, who also aren't real. But, the difference is that at least the Altgens Woman and Boy are photographic. They were real- somewhere. Not there, but somewhere else, they were photographed. 

But, the Towner Woman and Baby are complete fiction. They didn't live and breathe anywhere. They were totally made up.

Notice how big the Woman's head is compared to the that of the Fedora Man, and men tend to have bigger heads than women. Notice also that he's got a neck, and she does not. 

I could go on and on about this. There is plenty more. In fact, I came here this morning to point out something completely different. I was going to point out that as toneless and formless as that baby is, where it is completely lacking in muscle tone and responsiveness, it must be sound asleep. But if so, why doesn't she put it down in its baby carriage? She does have one, doesn't she? How could she not? Babies have to be changed often, so how could she change that baby without a baby carriage  in which to lie it down while she's changing it? She appears to be alone there in Dealey Plaza with that baby- there is no other adult with her. How could she possibly do it without a baby carriage, and since the baby must be asleep then, if it is alive at all, why doesn't she put the sleeping baby down in the baby carriage? But, it's supposed to be the same moment in time as the Altgens photo, and the Altgens boy is definitely NOT asleep, so how can someone be sound asleep and wide awake at the same time?

THEY AREN'T REAL! This is just more Bizarro World crap, brought to you courtesy of the JFK assassination. It is part of the weird, wild, wacky world of the JFK assassination. 

STOP BELIEVING THE CRAP! Stop supporting the vicious lie, and the whole thing is a vicious lie. Oswald did NOT kill Kennedy. He was standing in the doorway at the time. 

Say no to all this crap. Do it for the sake of John Kennedy. Do it for the sake of Lee Oswald. And just as much, do it for your sake, for the sake of your own mind, your own sanity. We should all be wearing t-shirts that say: "DON'T FEED ME CRAP...because I won't eat it."