Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This Muchmore frame comes very close to matching the Moorman photo, and it meets the requirements: It meets Professor SK's requirements of being taken at an angle from behind, and it meets the requirement of matching JFK and Jackie to how they look in the Moorman photo. 

And look how the motorcycle cops Hargis and Martin got captured, with Martin slightly leftward even though he was behind. That was how it looked from Muchmore's angle, but she was not as angled as Babushka Lady was. Look at the plat:

Babushka Lady was shooting at a slightly greater angle than Muchmore, which would have thrust Martin even more forward in her image than in Muchmore's.  There can be no doubt whatsoever that any image taken by BL would have captured the cops like this:

BL was swung around more than Muchmore, so of course her angle would have increased Martin's visibility in the picture. There is no doubt about that. So, if BL took the Moorman photo, as I maintain, it should feature Martin and Hargis as we see them above. 

Of course, it doesn't, but what it does show is a ridiculous lone right forearm of Martin which is a smoking gun.

That is impossible! The science of Optics, which is a branch of Physics, says it's impossible. This is 2015, and you can't argue ridiculous, moronic, unscientific things in 2015. There is no way that Mary Moorman, shooting from the left side on the grass, could capture just the right hand and forearm of Martin. The rest of him was in the way. The rest of him was in her line of fire. The rest of him had to be in her camera field. She didn't have to capture all of him, but she did have to capture more than his right arm. 

This is a bogus image. It is truly a smoking gun. And it is proof that the Moorman photo was altered.

It was put into the Moorman photo to represent her capture of BJ Martin precisely because her real capture of BJ Martin was taken out, which looked something like this:

The utterly stupid, asinine attempts to justify the presence of Martin's lone arm in the Moorman photo using diagrams that a Neanderthal would laugh at must stop. You people are just digging yourselves in deeper. There is no way to justify it. It is simply impossible. 

So, where are we at this point? I'll tell you where we are: We are at the point of NIST declaring on national television that the 9/11 Towers collapsed into their own footprints at nearly free-fall speed because of "office fires"- even though Building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane! That is the degree of rejection of reality and science that is involved in trying to justify Martin's lone right forearm in the Moorman photo. 

A camera isn't a gun. It doesn't fire a bullet. It fires (so to speak) a pyramidal-shaped visual field that captures everything in it. Of course, the light rays are actually going the other direction, towards the camera and not from it. Mary Moorman was to left of BJ Martin. She was to the left of ALL of BJ Martin. Maybe if he had been walking along and he stuck his right arm out ahead of himself in a stretch, and he kept his left arm and the rest of himself back, she could have taken a picture which captured just his right arm and no other part of him. But, he didn't do that. He was on a motorcycle, and his left arm was reaching Mary's visual field at the exact same time and in the exact same plane as his right arm. 

In other words, if you drew a line from Mary to his right arm, it would have to go through his left arm. Or you could say that if you drew a line from Mary to his left arm, it would then travel on to his right arm.  

They were lined up. His arms were lined up. And it's especially true in this case because he was riding a motorcycle in which the handlebars and handgrips were perfectly balanced and even and symmetrical. If the light from his right arm was reaching her camera, then the light from his left arm was reaching her camera. This is a bogus image!

The science behind this is irrefutable, and in the light of day (meaning outside the evil, snarly world of JFKing) it is going to be seen and recognized and acknowledged by all. There isn't the slightest shadow of a doubt about that. And I know just what is needed: What is needed is to get more Physics teachers and Physics students to look at this. What do you say we go that route? I'm not the least bit afraid of the outcome. Are you?