Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, Backes, you think Mary was shaken by the assassination? But, when she took her picture, she didn't know that an assassination was going on. So, your whole argument is rendered null and void. 

But, here's someone who wasn't the least bit shaken even after the assassination. 

Cop looks shaken. Spectators, including Mary Moorman and Jean Hill, have taken to the ground. But, Stonewall Babushka is standing tall: unshaken, unmoved, unstirred. 

Because I know he does not want his name cited, I am only going to refer to the Physics Professor as SK, and you better do the same if you know what's good for you. 

Professor SK's analysis of the Moorman photo stands. And what he determined, scientifically and mathematically, is that the Moorman photo was taken at an angle from behind, and at a steep angle at that. Now, if you think you can find a Physics Professor to contradict that, then go for it but let me tell you: SK is not worried. 

And knowing that it was taken at an angle from behind, we know that this frame from the Muchmore film matches the requirements perfectly... but only for Babushka Lady.

That is a near-perfect reproduction of the configuration of JFK and Jackie that we see in the Moorman photo.

It is the best-matching frame that there is and by far. The fact that it points to Babushka Lady taking it is not a problem because physics doesn't care. It doesn't have a dog in the fight. It doesn't care who took it. It only cares that the physical requirements be met. 

So, if you want to submit another frame, fine, but it better have as good a match of JFK and Jackie as we see here. It better show the photographer shooting from behind at an angle. And it better show the photographer with her camera held up to her eye taking a picture. If any of those things are missing or if they don't match as well as this one does, then you lose. Physics only cares about physics.