Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The official story of the JFK assassination has been absurd from the beginning. Once they discovered that James Tague had been grazed, they realized that that used up one of the 3 bullets. So did the fatal head shot. That left just one bullet to account for all the other wounds- if Oswald did the shooting. 

And that brought forth the Single Bullet Theory. But, it's patently false. You only have to look at the Zapruder film to know it. When the limo emerges from behind the freeway sign, Kennedy is reacting to having been shot, but Connally is NOT reacting.

There is absolutely no reason to think that Connally had a bullet course through his chest, from back to front, by that moment in time. No way, no chance, no how. Therefore, Connally wasn't hit yet. Kennedy was hit, but not Connally. Therefore, the Single Bullet Theory was crap from the getgo.

The first time the Zapruder film was made public was in 1969 at the Clay Shaw trial. But reportedly, bootleg copies were made which were distributed all over the country, especially among conspiracy advocates. The Zapruder film proves that the Single Bullet Theory is false, which means that the whole official story of the JFK assassination is false. 

So, why was it ever accepted by the American people? What is wrong with the American people that they accept such nonsense from the government and treat it as reality?

I know what's wrong with them. What's wrong is that they don't want to admit, even to themselves, that there is something terribly wrong with this country. At the time, it was either accept the official story or else realize that the whole thing was a lie and that the truth about the Kennedy assassination was much worse than any nightmare. It meant that America didn't exist. Certainly not any more. Not after November 22, 1963. 

That's what Jim Fetzer meant when he came up with this brilliant title for our OIC JFK truth conference in 2013.

But, what about today? It's no different today. In 2001, they claimed that "office fires" felled skyscrapers, and not just felled them, but felled them straight down into their own footprints at freefall speed in a manner that looked like controlled demolition. Most of the buildings were NOT affected by fire. The damage was limited, in all three cases. The idea that the mass of the buildings would provide no resistance whatsoever was preposterous, but that was the story. Building 7 wasn't even hit by a plane. Yet, "office fires" caused it to collapse like it did? The following is from the Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

Which tall tale is more preposterous, the official story of JFK or the official story of 9/11? Who knows. Why even bother to try to figure it out? They are both so preposterous that for all practical purposes, it is a tie. 

But, there is hope, and if you want to see the hope, go on Youtube. Do a search for JFK truth or 9/11 truth. You'll find countless videos. However little resistance you think there is, there is more today than ever before. The awakening has begun. And it's going to continue until the lies are completely obliterated. The lies about JFK and 9/11 are going to be completely obliterated. I guarantee it.