And, Ralph, I guess that means you think the envelope (with Oswald's
writing on it and with all the postmarks and stamps on it too) is a fake
as well, right? ....
http://history-matters.com/ archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh16/ html/WH_Vol16_0424a.htm
BTW, handwriting experts said that the letter is in Oswald's handwriting.
I guess you think those experts were liars too, correct?
writing on it and with all the postmarks and stamps on it too) is a fake
as well, right? ....
http://history-matters.com/
BTW, handwriting experts said that the letter is in Oswald's handwriting.
I guess you think those experts were liars too, correct?
Ralph Cinque:
You think the envelope proves it's valid? You're kidding, right?
And whose handwriting experts? The government's? Would they be like the government's anthropologists? And the government's scientists who tried to rationalize the collapse of the Towers, including Building 7 which was never hit by a plane, by concluding that it was felled by "office fires"?
And why would Oswald write his own name in Russian on the envelope? And even if he did:
I translated Oswald to Russian using Google Translate:
Освальд
Here is what's written on that envelope:
But, read what I wrote again because I gave cogent reasons why the authenticity of the letter should be rejected, and you haven't responded to any of them.
http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2016/08/there-is-handwritten-letter-that-lho.html
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.