Can you see that Lovelady's ears stuck out like Dumbo's? And that Doorman's didn't? I'll get back to that in a minute but first remember who Mark Lane was. He was a lawyer; just a lawyer. He wasn't the FBI. He didn't have immunity to alter photos like the FBI. They could do whatever they wanted; but not Mark Lane. He could have been disbarred. Bill Clinton was disbarred; for lying. No one ever accused Mark Lane of being sinister, and it would be awfully sinister to alter the photo. So, because this image was from Mark Lane, you know it's valid. You know he didn't do anything to it. That is really how Lovelady's ears were; protruding. But, look at this FBI photo:
These images were taken about the same time, the winter of 1964, and it's obvious that the FBI got rid of Lovelady's protruding ears, and they also made him less bald, giving him more hair on top. They may have done other things, but those are the two things that jump out at us. The ears alone clinch it because Doorman's one visible ear, his right, is a spot-on match to Oswald's.
What more does anybody want or need? It is the same ear. And ears are as distinctive and individual as fingerprints.
The whole issue of Oswald in the doorway is like the poster child for the unlimited and unrestrained ability of government to lie, lie, lie in a frenzy of lying whenever it's trapped in a corner by its own deceit. This was a conscious effort to deceive, and they knew exactly what they were doing. "Sinister" does not even begin to adequately describe it.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.