Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I am also in correspondence with Mark Shaw, the lawyer who has written a book about the murder of Dorothy Gilgallen, and he, apparently, is having success in getting the case reopened. He is on a speaking tour, but he is taking the time to communicate with me. This is something I wrote to him:

Mark, you are absolutely right, which is to say that Dorothy Kilgallen was absolutely right, that Ruby was practically bald. And therefore, the many images of him with substantial hair were faked. I wish you would open your mind to Jack Ruby innocence. He wasn't there. He got there early and was skirted up to the 5th floor and held there until they could slip him into the story. FBI Agent James Bookhout impersonated him during the televised spectacle. You've got the scoop on this, Mark. You're the one who could take it to the heights, not me. 

Look: they didn't kill Dorothy Kilgallen because of anything she found out about the JFK assassination. You are absolutely right that they killed her over one thing: Jack Ruby. It was for what she was about to find out about him that she was killed. And it was not that he was a Mafioso and a player in the JFK assassination and killed Oswald to silence him. That's the official alternate story. That's what they wanted the naysayers to believe. And even now, it is what they want them to believe. Just last year, the mainstream press was circulating a story that Ruby took some petty criminal to "go watch the fireworks" in Dealey Plaza. Ruby didn't watch anything. Ruby was definitely in the Dallas Morning News building at the time of the motorcade, as multiple witnesses attested, and as he said so himself. So, that was a false story that the media circulated. But, why did they do it? They did it because it's totally false and polar opposite to the truth. Ruby had nothing to do with the JFK assassination. He had no foreknowledge of it. And likewise, he had nothing to do with the Oswald assassination. Mark: Ruby brought his dog along and left her in the car when he went to Western Union. Doesn't that prove to you that he had no intention of shooting Oswald? 

Neither you nor I know exactly what Dorothy found out, but we know she was a very bright woman, and in conversing with Ruby twice, I suspect that she discovered two things: one, that he was childlike and innocent in his bearing, emanating not the slightest impulse towards violence, and two, he was not right in his head. He was delusional and just plain incompetent. If she didn't figure out that he was a victim, she was on the threshold, and they couldn't take the chance of her figuring it out. She died because of the truth about Jack Ruby, that he was innocent. 

Ralph