Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

this gives us the opportunity to compare the Beers and Jackson photos. After all, unnamed "experts" determined that they were taken .6 second apart.

.
.6 second? That is a hell of a lot of change in .6 second. Leavelle goes from looking and walking straight ahead, totally oblivious to "Ruby" to being turned towards him and looking at him. And in the top picture (Beers) the representation of Leavelle's hand and forearm as he has Oswald by his pants is crudely painted. It doesn't look remotely anatomical. Oswald, supposedly, reacted to being shot by slapping his arm to his chest like Tarzan. But, how could he do that in .6 second? And if you think he did it, then imagine the velocity with which he did it. But, what about Newton's 3rd Law of Motion? His arm would have acted on his chest, but his chest would have acted on his arm. In other words, at that speed, his arm would have bounced off his chest, not come to rest. If he slowly placed his arm there, that would be one thing. But, we're talking about .6 second. Then, it looks like he is thrusting his right hand forward. None of that happened in the Garage during the televised spectacle. It may look to you that Leavelle has got his hand buried in Oswald's pant pocket, but that ain't his pocket. His fingers are buried over the top of his pants; inside his pants;down into his pants. And supposedly, they were walking along like that, where the cop had his hand buried in the crotch area of the prisoner's pants. In what other situation would anyone accept that possibility? In no other. Only the JFK assassination. The weird, wild, wacky world of the JFK assassination. 

And look at all the change in Ruby in .6 second, Notice that his arm is more extended in the top photo. He is reaching. He's stretching. His arm is extended. In the bottom photo, his arm is cocked. His upper arm must be close to his body; his elbow is bent, and he's not reaching at all. And notice that he is no longer to the side of Oswald, shooting at him angular. Now, he's in front of Oswald, still holding the gun like he's poised to shoot him. But, he's already shot him, and there was just the one shot. There is no indication in the films that the Shooter continued pointing the gun at Oswald- or anyone else. 

What this is really meant to be is a Benjamin Braddock moment. "There is Jack Ruby. He is about to shoot Oswald.  Nobody notices him. They won't notice him until after he has shot Oswald.  Why don't they see him before that when they are supposed to be on high alert for someone like him? When they were supposed to be looking earnestly for someone like him, a gunman? Well, the important thing is that they did everything they could to try to stop this terrible tragedy. And that's why they, Leavelle and Graves, were treated like heroes afterwards and still are. So, even though "Ruby" was clearly within the visual field of all of them- even though he was a moving object within the visual field of all of them- they did not see him. And notice that the Shooter is firing the gun with his middle finger on the trigger. Why did he do that when he had an index finger? And why didn't somebody ask Ruby about that? Say, Jack, why'd you use your index finger. Jack: How do I know? I wasn't even aware of doing it. Wait. My lawyer Tom Howard wants to whisper something in my ear. OK, got it, Tom, thanks. You see, I used my middle finger because that's Jackie Kennedy's favorite finger,  I'm all things Jackie."