Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I'd like to speak to you today about something I believe in very strongly, which is that the first shot that hit President Kennedy, which was the shot to his back, at the level of T3, just to the right of his spine, was not a bullet. It was a frozen dart; you might say, an icicle. And this icicle contained shellfish toxin. It was a preparatory shot; to soften him up; to make him an easy target; and to derail any defensive action on his part once he got into the Kill Zone. 

Before I go any further, let me say that my strong conviction about this is based on two things: 1) evidence, that being what we see of him in the Zapruder film, the extreme change in his behavior, his countenance, his awareness, his cognition, and the bizarre and aberrant muscular state that he is in post-sign. He is a wreck; both physically and mentally; and the trauma he received up to that point can't explain it. It can't account for it.

But, the second thing that drives me to this conclusion is the complete inadequacy and implausibility of all other explanations of what we see in the Zapruder film. Of course, the official explanation is that he was hit with one bullet that traversed his neck from back to front. But, that is ridiculous because it would have been so catastrophic, his body would have shut down. We're talking about a tunnel through his neck from back to front. He could not have sustained such a trauma and gone on sitting there, lifting his arms, etc. He would have collapsed for sure, but he may very well have lost consciousness.  There is simply no chance that that happened. And remember: the autopsists could have opened him up and observed that alleged damage, but they didn't. Why didn't they? Why weren't they allowed to? Because that damage wasn't there. 

So, the single bullet theory is just complete, total, utter nonsense. In addition to everything else, it is medical nonsense. But unfortunately, the alternatives that detractors have offered are just as implausible and nonsensical. 

The most popular one is that he was hit with a bullet, but it just stopped an inch inside his body. but, that is impossible. Do you realize that the bullet would have been travelling 2000 feet per second? It would have hit him at that speed. How can an object traveling that fast stop in an inch? And imagine what would happen if it did stop in an inch. You've heard of Isaac Newton. You know about his Laws of Motion. The energy of that bullet traveling 2000 feet per second would have to be dissipated.  It would have to be taken out on something: either the bullet itself, or the tissue, or both.  But, JFK's back was clean. There was a small entrance wound there. There was a hole, but not a lot of damage otherwise. And there was no bullet at all. 

Some claim that the bullet was dug out at the "pre-autopsy." I'm not saying there wasn't a pre-autopsy. I believe there was. Just the fact that JFK's tracheotomy got widened and enlarged tells you that there was.  But, they didn't dig a bullet out of his back. It wouldn't have come that easily. They truly would have had to dig it out, and it would have disrupted his back. It wouldn't have looked so clean afterwards.

JFK was not hit in the back with a bullet. He was hit with a missile, but it was an ice dart. It tore into him a little ways and burst, effectively melting instantly.

So, you don't even have the option of claiming that he was hit with a bullet. There is no evidence for that, and it defies the Laws of Physics. 

But, he was definitely hit in the back with something, and it affected him immediately. He stopped waving. You can see that JFK wasn't waving in the Croft, Betzner, and Willis photos. 

If you watch this video of CIA Director William Colby, he lays out exactly what happened. He doesn't mention JFK, but that doesn't matter. The political incorrectness of saying such a thing would have stopped him even if he knew better. A person who is in a high position in the government can't come out and say that the government killed Kennedy. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4m6dldvNECI&t=37s

In the complete video of that hearing, which is about 40 minutes long, Colby refers repeatedly to shellfish toxin as the agent used. 

This piece from Conspiracy Wiki refers to JFK's "unexplainable wound" linking it to the heart attack gun.

https://conspiracy.fandom.com/wiki/Heart_Attack_Gun

We're talking about brevetoxins which are algal poisons that accumulate in shellfish that are neuro-excitatory. They cause an influx of sodium ions across nerve and muscle membranes, which results in depolarization, and that results in ataxia, the loss of control of one's muscles. And that is exactly what we see on Kennedy in the Zapruder film, where he can't control what his arms are doing. 

That is not a voluntary action on JFK's part. He can't control what his arms are doing. He can't put his arms down. Jackie is trying to coax him to relax his arms, but he can't do it. It is a bizarre, pathological dyskinesia, the result of being poisoned with a nerve agent. 

The back shot, which hit him high on the hill, was taken from the Dal-Tex Building using the CIA "heart attack gun" that Colby described, which was loaded with the toxic ice-dart. Note that Colby said that the gun had a range of 100 meters, and the distance was less than that. 

It tore into his back and got immediately into his bloodstream. From that point on, the limo moved very slowly down the hill, as slow as possible, to give it time to work. 

"Victims have been described as appearing disoriented and possibly intoxicated."

That is in reference to shellfish toxin, and is that not what we see on Kennedy in the Zapruder film? He is a basket case of disorientation and intoxication. 

This image shows the small clean wound on JFK's back. Nobody dug a bullet out of that.

JFK's actions and behavior in the Zapruder film are nothing short of weird. What the hell is he doing there, jabbing his elbow at Jackie? He doesn't know why he's doing it. He has no control over himself. It is a freaky thing and not the result of physical damage to his nervous system. 

To that point, the physical trauma to him was minimal. You can't possibly attribute his bizarre mental absence and his neuromuscular dyskinesia, as seen in the Zapruder film, to physical trauma from one or more bullets. The very strange state that he was in was due to pharmacology and toxicology, not to physical trauma.  

At this point in time, the only physical trauma to JFK is a shallow wound to his back that did not hit anything vital, and a shallow wound in his throat. The autopsists didn't dissect that either, but it certainly did not inflict any damage on his nervous system or his brain. He should have been OK mentally. He should have been able to think and respond. The complete incapacitation of JFK that we see in the Zapruder film was not due to physical trauma. It was due to poisoning. 

Are you aware that shellfish toxin can be absorbed through the intact skin? That with no disruption of the skin, the toxin can pass through the skin and affect a person systemically and quickly? But, in this case, it was delivered through the violated skin. And they had over a decade to develop it. The research started in 1952, according to Colby. He said it was a secret operation of the CIA and Army Intelligence at Fort Dietrich, which is in Maryland, close to Washington. This really is what happened to JFK, and no other theory comes close to explaining the evidence that we see in the Zapruder film of the bizarre and extreme changes that afflicted JFK, and quite suddenly. 

Here he is in Z-180, smiling and waving. This is the "Before" shot.

Here is the "After" shot, showing him all bound up and clenched, and note that he was mentally unresponsive.

Again, physical trauma cannot explain this. Only toxicology can explain it.