Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The Splat Heard 'Round The World

The Splat. That's what JFK's shot in the back was. It wasn't a bullet that tunneled into his body. It was a sharp but delicate object that just pierced his skin a little and then shattered and splattered, and then poof, it was gone. 

A bullet can't do that. The JFK community dropped the ball on this. From the beginning, and all along, they rejected the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory. But when left with a super-shallow wound in his back, how did they explain it? Nothing but cockamamie ideas- as if the JFK assassination occurred within its own physical universe. 

Think back to high school when you took Driver's Ed. You were taught that a car requires one car length of stopping distance for every 10 miles per hour of speed. So, a car going 60 mph needs 6 car lengths to stop. A bullet travels  at least1200 mph and up to 2800. So, if it were a car, imagine how much distance it would require to stop. 

Of course, a car will eventually stop even with no braking at all. What causes it to stop? Friction. Friction from the road, and also, air resistance. 

Of course, a bullet entering the body is not going to encounter air resistance, but the body's tissues provide resistance. Remember Newton. The bullet and the tissues both act on each other. The tissues suffer damage and disruption, in a word: trauma. The bullet suffers loss of velocity, but it gets damaged too. It may not be much, but it's something. 

So, if a FMJ bullet hit JFK the back, at the speed that it was going, it is mathematically possible to calculate the resistance of his tissues (and we're not talking about a lot of tissue because the bullet did not even reach muscle. It went through the skin to the fascia.) 

If you know the momentum  and propulsive force of the bullet, and you also know the resistance of the tissues, you can determine the distance that a bullet will travel thorough any given tissues. It's a mater of physics and mathematics. 

And for an FMJ bullet traveling at bullet-speed, and going through skin and fascia, there is no way that such a bullet could reach zero velocity in that short a distance. From bullet speed to absolute stillness just from passing through skin and fascia? No way! The mathematics doesn't add up.

I keep telling you: it was not a bullet. It was a very specialized missile that was essentially made of ice. 

What do you know about the physics of water? Did you know that water is the only substance that expands when it's frozen? Are you aware of how unstable ice (frozen water) is? Have you noticed that all you have to do is pour room temperature water over ice cubes, and they start cracking and breaking apart. That's how unstable ice is. And there are ways of making it more unstable. For instance, the more minerals there are in the water, the more unstable the ice is. That's because the minerals interfere with the crystalline structure of the hydrogen/oxygen bonds in the ice. 

Just as an ice cube that you dig out of the tray can burst, so can an ice spicule that pierces your skin. And if it's formulated correctly, it can literally blow up. 

And that is what happened to John F. Kennedy. He wasn't hit in the back with a bullet. If he was, there is no way it could have stopped so fast. But, an ice flechette? Yes. That can be designed to burst on impact, where it just penetrates a little and then blows up. I'm not talking about melting. I'm talking about blowing up into tiny little pieces of ice, which then melt very quickly because they are so small.

And let's also remember that NO BULLET WAS FOUND IN JFK'S BACK. And no bullet was found anywhere else.  And that is another reason to reject the idea that he was hit with a bullet. 

Bullets don't hit their target and disappear, but an ice spicule does, or at least, it can- if it's made right. 

Stop thinking that this is a wild theory. The theory that a solid bullet hit him at speed and went to zero velocity just from passing through clothes and skin, that's the wild theory. That does not constitute enough resistance to stop such a bullet. But, the ice flechette? Don't you get it? It was designed to do just that.