Another thing about this bag is that it's too long. Supposedly, Oswald carried the rifle by tucking one end in his armpit and cupping the other end in his hand. So, the bag could only be as long as his arm. He wasn't a gorilla, was he?
And how could anyone transport hard, jagged rifle parts in a paper bag without tearing the bag? There isn't the slightest tear in that bag. And what about when he emptied the bag? It didn't tear then either? Really? And why would he empty it at all? Why go to the trouble of opening it and pouring out the contents? Wouldn't it make more sense to put it down and rip it open? Did he actually have the thought, "I don't want to rip this bag. I went to a lot of trouble to make it. And waste not, want not." How could a makeshift paper bag, which went through the process of being loaded with loose, jutting rifle parts, and then carried that way, and then emptied that way, survive the journey without the paper getting the least bit torn? Did I mention that it was only paper?
Look: it's stupid. It is profoundly stupid. It was stupid then, and it's stupid now. Yet, it is what we are expected to believe. You have to be stupid to believe the official story of the JFK assassination.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.