Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 An Open Letter to Dan Abrams

from Ralph Cinque 

Dan, you are wrong about Jack Ruby. If you just look closely at the images of the Shooter and compare them to Ruby on 11/24/63, you can see that it wasn't him. Compare the backs of their heads and their hair in back. 

How can those two be the same man on the same day? 

Ruby was 5'9" the same height as Oswald. The Shooter was short. He was the shortest man in the garage. He must have been no more than 5'6." That's how tall FBI Agent James Bookhout was. And Bookhout was masquerading as Ruby during the shooting.

5.9" is average height, then and now, and there is no way a 5'9" man would appear so short in that crowd.  He isn't Ruby.

On the right below is the only frontal view of the Shooter. He is a spot-on match to James Bookhout, age-adjusted.

So, on the right, they blackened out his eyes and did other things to obscure the fact that he was James Bookhout and not Jack Ruby. 

Dan, the reason Ruby had no memory of shooting Oswald is because he didn't shoot him. Ruby showed up at the garage 45 minutes to an hour earlier than claimed. He was pounced upon and dragged up to the 5th floor jail. That's where he was when the made-for-television spectacle occurred. 

Jack Ruby is the most wronged man in history. He was totally innocent of shooting Oswald. He had nothing to do with it. But, he was impaired mentally (due at least in part to drugs that he was given) and he was incapable of grasping what really happened. What about you, Dan? Are you capable of grasping what really happened? Please respond to this email if you want to know more; if you want to be on the side of truth and on the right side of history.  Thank you. Ralph Cinque