This debate that I had with David Von Pein about the Garage Shooter was brought to my attention again by a supporter. And after reading it again, I have to say that I think I did very well, that I prevailed, and I made him look foolish.
Ruby NEVER admitted killing Oswald. Even in his final interview, done two weeks before he died at Parkland Hospital, he said he had no memory of doing it. How can you admit to doing something that you don't remember doing? What he conceded was that Dallas Police told him that he did it, and since he didn't have it in him to dispute what the Dallas Police, his heroes, said, he therefore had to accept that he did it. But, there is a big difference between accepting that you did something and admitting that you did it. He accepted that he did it without having any memory of doing it, without having any knowledge of doing it, without having any intention of doing it, and not even having any inclination to do it. He accepted it simply because he was not one to challenge Authority. Many times he said that all he remembered was going to the garage and then suddenly the police were pouncing on him, and he did not know why. And think about his quoted words during the melee: "What are you doing? I'm Jack Ruby. You know me. I'm not a criminal." He admitted saying that, and others said that he said it. But, why would he say it if he knew he shot Oswald? Ruby didn't have any awareness of shooting Oswald until police told him that he did on the 5th floor.
And he really was impaired mentally. Because: a normal person with no memory of having done such a thing, and with no tendency or capacity to do such a thing, would ever accept it- no matter how many police told him that he did. His attitude would be, "Fuck you all! I didn't do it!" You see, that's normal. That's healthy- in that situation.
And it applies to you, the person reading this. Unless you are a soldier who killed in war- and that's a whole other subject- I presume you've never killed anyone. I presume you've never thought about killing anyone. I presume you are someone who has lived his or her whole life with a perception of yourself that, except in dire self-defense, you wouldn't kill anyone. In other words: you're not a murderer. So, if you were standing in a crowd, and police jumped you and told you that you shot someone, you would trust your own experience, your own cognitive faculties. If you know you didn't do it from your own awareness, no amount of lipflapping by others that you did it would move you. You would just assume that you were being framed. And you would be strong. You would believe in yourself and continue believing in yourself- despite what others were saying.
And the Dallas Police were most certainly corrupt. Jim Leavelle was a liar. He lied his head off. He never saw the Shooter coming, let alone recognized him as Jack Ruby. He never jerked on Oswald to try to protect him. He didn't react in any way until after the shot was fired. The films tell us that. He was looking the other way. He was looking right as "Ruby" (really Bookhout) shot from the left.
Jack Ruby was innocent, and it is the most pivotal truth of the whole JFK assassination saga, that and the fact that Oswald was standing in the doorway during the shooting. The same people who killed Kennedy killed Oswald. And they were under the gun because Oswald was clamoring about not having a lawyer. How much longer could they continue denying him one when it was his Constitutional right? And if he spoke to a lawyer even once, it would have been all over for the perps. He and the lawyer would have had them by the throat. They had to kill Oswald. and they didn't just get lucky with Jack Ruby coming along. It was their operation from start to finish. Like Oswald, Ruby was another patsy. The difference was that Oswald was of sound mind, and Ruby wasn't.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.