Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 If you doubt what I'm saying that the Beers photo was altered over James Bookhout short height, and so they made it look like he was all stretched with his feet wide apart, then compare it to the Jackson photo. They were taken at essentially the same time. The story goes that Beers came first and Jackson was a fraction of a second later, like half a second. And you can't change your stance very much in half a second.

In the case of Jackson, I have not added an enhancement to complete him, and that's because it's impossible to know for sure what his feet were doing. However, I suspect that they were both flat on the ground and average distance apart.

However, I am very confident about the enhancement I did for Beers because in the position he is in, he had to be up on the toes of his left foot. And if you try to duplicate the position yourself, I think you'll find that I'm right.

But, I'm not saying that Beers Shooter was doing what I'm describing. I think it was done in "post". That's an expression. In the movie business, "post" is short for "post-production." And post-production refers to everything you do to a film after you're done shooting it.

So, I'm saying that the Beers Shooter was configured differently, but they saw that he looked very short, which did not fit for Jack Ruby. So, they called the artists in for a solution. In those days, they did everything with paint. Today, it's all done digitally, and it's referred to as "visual effects."

But, we have to compare the Beers photo that we have to the Jackson photo that we have. And obviously, the Beers Shooter and the Jackson Shooter are configured very differently. So, how could it have gone from one to the other in half a second? The Shooter rushed in and shot Oswald in what was practically a contact shot. He didn't stop far away from him and stretch in the rest of the distance to do it. And if you check the films, such as NBC and KFLD, you'll see that.

You can't reconcile these two images. Either the Shooter had a huge spread between his feet, or he didn't. So, they both can't be real. And I don't think either one of them was real. I think they were both taken at a photo-shoot earlier that morning.

Supposedly, the last interrogation of LHO went from 9 AM until 11:15. That's over 2 hours. With all the sessions that preceded it, don't you think they would have run out of things to talk about?

James Bookhout admitted that he was there that Sunday morning. He said that after the last interrogation, when LHO was brought downstairs to his ultimate demise, he, Bookhout, remained in Fritz' office. Why? He provided no reason. He said nothing about needing to make a call. He provided nothing at all. Then he said he heard that Oswald had been shot, so he went down to the Jail Office, and by then, Oswald was on the floor there. But, it was all a lie. Bookhout masqueraded as Ruby in the televised spectacle.

But then, Bookhout was asked what Oswald said in the last interrogation. Bookhout said he didn't know because he got there a little late, and not wanting to disturb the meeting, he just watched it through the glass partition of Fritz' office. (Fritz' office was like a fishbowl."

Now, do you believe that? Do you believe that James Bookhout, who was the liaison to the Dallas Police for the FBI would have refrained from entering Fritz' office? Frankly, I don't think he was that shy.

But then, the WC questioner asked Bookhout if Fritz' said if Oswald said anything noteworthy during the session, and Bookhout said that Fritz said he didn't. In 2 hours and 15 minutes? Nothing of importance was said? According to Harry Holmes, another liar, Oswald waxed on about his trip to Mexico City, which he denied taking in the first session. Holmes was the only one who made this claim. So, Oswald retracted a lie he told in the first session, and that wasn't important? Oswald never retracted anything. He never went to Mexico City, which I had the privilege of discussing with Mark Lane. And Mark knew it as early as December 7, 1963 when he published his Lawyer's brief.

So, my point is that there was no final interrogation. That time was spent getting ready for the photo-shoot in the basement, so that they could capture those "iconic" photos in advance. And they were also there to capture the real Jack Ruby, who got there an hour early. By the way, the Fritz notes for the final Oswald interview contained nothing but the names of the men who were there; not one word about anything Oswald said.