Wednesday, October 30, 2024


 Notice the screen that they put over JFK's back where he got shot with the ice bullet. Apparently, it disrupted his jacket, which they had to cover up. I'm sure it didn't require anything that big, but they were trying to make it look like his jacket was ruffling- and that's what people claimed. such as the late Professor John McAdams of Marquette University in Chicago, who was one of the guard dogs of the official story. I had my clashes with him, and I have to think that he's feeling the heat right now.

So, on the left, that is not JFK's jacket ruffling. He wore thousand dollar suits, and I mean a thousand dollars in 1963 money. His suits were tailored to him, and I mean they measured every part of his body and then manufactured his suits from scratch. His jackets fit him like a glove, and they didn't ruffle. What that is is a cover-up because that is the exact spot that he was hit in the back. They only needed the right side, but they had to bunch it up all the way across to sell it as a ruffle.
On the right, I put the replacement image of Jackie that they used. It's from her televised January 14. 1964 address to the nation, thanking Americans for their cards and letters. Notice that they horizontally flipped it, and they did a lot of that in the JFK assassination. Several images of Oswald were horizontally flipped, and so was one of Lovelady. I think they had a practice of checking all images to see if they liked the horizontally-flipped one better.
According to the official story, JFK wasn't hit yet in the Crofts photo, and nothing was wrong. If so, then why does Jackie look so dour? She was a political wife on a political mission. Her job was to smile and wave at people and look dazzling. So, why was she so glum there? It's because it was from a different time, when she was in mourning.
With the Crofts photo, the photo-alterers were out to hide the fact that JFK was shot in it. Notice that his eyes are shut, and because of Jackie's jutting hair, you can't see his mouth. JFK was reacting, in a startled way, to being shot, and they had to cover it up.
Robert Croft was from Powell, Wyoming, and they took his camera from him on November 22, and they didn't return it to him until the end of January. That was according to him. It took them that long to figure out what to do about his photo which showed JFK reacting to being shot high on the hill.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.