Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 I did a test on Oswald Innocence allowing comments briefly to see what would come in. And what came in was the same mindless blather as before.

My critics are idiots. They don't know how to think. Consider what we know as facts:

1) The Secret Service changed JFK's tie, and they did it with foresight. They, themselves, had a replacement tie for him, in the limo., sitting on the front seat for Kellerman to grab. How weird is it for the Secret Service to be sartorial advisor to the President?

2 ) The fact that the Secret Service changed JFK's tie was earnestly, doggedly, and systematically covered up in the hope that it would be expunged from the official story forever. What screwed it for them was Jackie Kennedy having witnessed the tie-change, and having seen her husband put the first tie in his jacket pocket, and having sought it to give it to their Doorman, Preston Bruce. That's what turned it into a human interest story.

So yes, there is an unanswered question about why the Secret Service did it, why they sought to and did replace JFK's tie. But, that dilemma isn't sitting on my shoulders. It's not up to me to explain why they did it.

It stands as an extremely irregular action by the Secret Service, and one they tried to cover up. If there was an innocent reason why they did it, why didn't they just tell the reason, rather than try so hard to cover it up?

There is still a Secret Service today, currently lead by Sean Curran. So, he should address why his forebearers changed JFK's tie 63 years ago right before this happened:

Again: you can't say it was because of a soiling or stain because there is no evidence of that, and it would have been dealt with differently if it were just that. His tie would have been replaced on the plane, or even prior to that. So, don't try to say it.