bpete is a very stupid man. He thinks you have to look at crotches to tell whether individuals are male or female.

But, we see people every day and we know immediately whether they are male or female and without looking at their crotches. In Medicine, the term is "secondary sexual characteristics". If the genitalia are the primary sexual characteristic, then the other non-genital features which distinguish males from females are the secondary sexual characteristics. And in this case, we clearly see a female on the left and a male on the right. And in her case, the area of her crotch isn't even in the picture. 

I tell you, bpete is just plain stupid, and he is very immature. Embarrassingly so for a middle-aged man. He's like a child. He's in his 40s, but mentally, he is a boy, not a man. 

His full handle is bpete1969. If that's the year of his birth, then he's, 45. 

Duncan MacRae has a music video on his Google page from 1985 in which he was performing when he was 16 years old. I'll give you the link. It's not my kind of music- just noise to me. 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k8syMygjPOA

But, if he was 16 in 1985, that means he was born in 1969- just like bpete.  

bpete, that is, MacRae, you don't seem to understand who is in charge here, who gives the orders. That would be me. And if you don't like that, then it's Joseph Backes, the proscenium arches, and you know the routine. By now, you know it well.  My answer to your questions are two words, and the second one is "you". 

Now, moving on, I was saying that Harvey was malnourished in his formative years and most likely including the 9 months he spent in the womb. No such hardship befell Lee. It resulted in this disparity:

You see, they only looked alike in their faces. Their bodies were vastly different, and I'm sure it got to be a problem. That may be why we have no images of Lee beyond 1959. That image above on the left is the very last image we have of Lee, and it's dated 1959.

This Bronx Zoo picture was taken in 1953, so Harvey would have been 14 years old. 14! Can you imagine that he was that small at the age of 14? Lee's half-brother John Pic was shown this picture by the Warren Commission, and he said that it was NOT his brother.

It has reached the point that the certainty of Two Oswalds is just as great as the certainty of Oswald in the doorway, and that is absolute. Here is a good concise statement about the Two Oswalds from the Harvey and Lee website which is run by James Hargrove but with the approval and involvement of John Armstrong:

JFK researcher John Armstrong has shown the Warren Commission combined the biographies of two different people to arrive at the classic legend of Lee Harvey Oswald. A Russian speaking youth, possibly of Hungarian parents, was brought to the U.S. following World War II and given the name HARVEY Oswald. HARVEY was of small stature, quiet, slightly malnourished, and lived with a short, heavy-set Marguerite Oswald impostor who never smiled. New Orleans born LEE Oswald was tall, husky, and athletic. As a youth LEE lived with half-brother John Pic, brother Robert Oswald, and his tall, nice-looking mother, Marguerite Claverie Oswald. A program created by US intelligence merged the identities of Russian-speaking HARVEY and American-born LEE Oswald. The result, ten years later, was that young Russian-speaking HARVEY had an American background and birth certificate. HARVEY was an ideal candidate to “defect” to the Soviet Union and work as an undercover agent who secretly understood Russian. HARVEY “defected” and two years later returned to America with a Russian wife and child. A year later this former “defector” was handing out literature in support of Castro and Cuba. Unknown to HARVEY, he had become the ideal candidate to frame for the assassination of President Kennedy. And also unknown to HARVEY were the activities of LEE Oswald in the summer and fall of 1963, when LEE was impersonating HARVEY and helping to set up HARVEY as the accused assassin of President Kennedy.

You really should visit the Harvey and Lee website if you haven't. It was newly reorganized this year: 

http://www.harveyandlee.net/

Jack White said it best when he said that anyone who does not accept the work of John Armstrong has to be fundamentally lacking in intelligence, and I agree.  There is just too much evidence to dismiss. It is way past the threshold of certainty. 

Harvey Oswald was short and small throughout his childhood. He would have been about 13 in the above picture. And it was lucky for him (if we can ever apply the word "lucky" to him) that he had a late growth spurt. By 1955, he was 16, and he may have been 5'6", but he may have shorter. 

After that, he reached 5'9", but I consider that a late growth spurt. 

Why was he so scrawny? Was it just genetic? That may have been part of it, but it wasn't all of it. I think it's likely that his biological mother (who was not the short, dumpy Marguerite Oswald of fame) was poorly nourished when she bore him. It was 1939, so wartime, and the living conditions in Eastern Europe, where she was, were bad. There is speculation that he wound up in an orphanage, which meant that his post-uterine nutrition was no better than his intra-uterine nutrition. When you get a bad start in life in that respect, you never fully recover. 

And when Dr. Hartogs interviewed Harvey in New York in the early 50s, he said that he looked like a starving refugee child from the war zone. He pegged it. 

Meanwhile, Lee underwent no such nutritional strain and was beefy by nature. 

As I said, the senior members of the Oswald Innocence Campaign all agree that Oswald was innocent and that he was standing in the doorway at the time of the murder. But, there is divergence among members about other things.

For instance, Philip Nelson maintains that LBJ was the mastermind of the assassination, whereas John Hankey maintains that George HW Bush had a higher role in the planning of the assassination. 

Which one of them is right? I haven't the slightest desire to take one side or the other. I know that LBJ and George HW Bush were both deeply involved and high up in the chain. 

In fact, George HW Bush, although a lifelong Republican, skipped the inauguration of Richard Nixon, a man who was the direct protege' of his father, Prescott Bush, just to see LBJ off at the airport. Can you imagine? That's how good and close of friends Johnson and Bush were. 

Forget about the party difference. Who gives a shit about that? They had something much more important in common: blood. The blood of John Kennedy. When you murder together, that makes you brothers, alright. And it's a brotherhood that is very high up on the totem pole. It means being brothers for life. 

OK, I got the definitive word from John Armstrong. This picture was taken in the 8th grade, in October 1954, at Beauregard Junior High in New Orleans. The one who took the picture was Ed Voebel.

So, that was 1954. The CAP picture was 1955, so just a year later.

So, do you think that Lee went from being the biggest kid in the class in 1954 to the smallest guy in the unit in 1955?

Psst. They're two different guys. 

Yes, it is pretty damn insane to think that these two were the same human being with the same kind of genitalia. The claim that they are the same is an example of the Bizarro World that JFK assassination research has become. It is an example of one of those "big lies" that Hitler used to talk about,  "a lie so colossal that no one would believe that someone "could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously." 

Did you know that Warren Commissioners Allan Dulles and John McCloy were both involved in Operation Paperclip which involved whitewashing Nazis and getting them visas to emigrate to America? One of them, Walter Dornberger, became the head of Bell Aircraft where Michael Paine worked. Fancy that.

 

After a long stint at Trembling Hills, Backes is back. I don't know how much Thorazine they pumped into him, but I'm thinking of buying stock in Sandoz. 

And what did it take to awaken Backes out of his stupor? He didn't like the designation of this picture of Oswald as being from the 6th grade. He thinks it's the 9th. 

Well, Oswald looks big enough to be in the 9th grade, but what about the others? Look at that little girl next to him. 9th grade is the first year of high school. Does she look like a high school student? 

Regardless of what grade it was, Oswald looks a lot bigger than the others, and that is the point. Is there any chance that the Lee Harvey Oswald we know was ever the biggest kid in class?

I rather doubt it. In fact, the LHO we know was quite a runt his whole childhood, where he was both short and small. 

And I've got news for you, Backass: Lee only completed 1 month of the 9th grade before dropping out to join the Marines. So, maybe it was the 7th or 8th grade, but definitely not the 9th. 

As for Harvey, as I said, he was small. Here he is in 1955, so age 16, where you can see that he is both short and small.

Fortunately for Harvey, he had a growth spurt after that which took him up to 5'9".  But, you don't think Oswald went from biggest to smallest, do you?