Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete, that is, MacRae, you don't seem to understand who is in charge here, who gives the orders. That would be me. And if you don't like that, then it's Joseph Backes, the proscenium arches, and you know the routine. By now, you know it well.  My answer to your questions are two words, and the second one is "you". 

Now, moving on, I was saying that Harvey was malnourished in his formative years and most likely including the 9 months he spent in the womb. No such hardship befell Lee. It resulted in this disparity:

You see, they only looked alike in their faces. Their bodies were vastly different, and I'm sure it got to be a problem. That may be why we have no images of Lee beyond 1959. That image above on the left is the very last image we have of Lee, and it's dated 1959.

This Bronx Zoo picture was taken in 1953, so Harvey would have been 14 years old. 14! Can you imagine that he was that small at the age of 14? Lee's half-brother John Pic was shown this picture by the Warren Commission, and he said that it was NOT his brother.

It has reached the point that the certainty of Two Oswalds is just as great as the certainty of Oswald in the doorway, and that is absolute. Here is a good concise statement about the Two Oswalds from the Harvey and Lee website which is run by James Hargrove but with the approval and involvement of John Armstrong:

JFK researcher John Armstrong has shown the Warren Commission combined the biographies of two different people to arrive at the classic legend of Lee Harvey Oswald. A Russian speaking youth, possibly of Hungarian parents, was brought to the U.S. following World War II and given the name HARVEY Oswald. HARVEY was of small stature, quiet, slightly malnourished, and lived with a short, heavy-set Marguerite Oswald impostor who never smiled. New Orleans born LEE Oswald was tall, husky, and athletic. As a youth LEE lived with half-brother John Pic, brother Robert Oswald, and his tall, nice-looking mother, Marguerite Claverie Oswald. A program created by US intelligence merged the identities of Russian-speaking HARVEY and American-born LEE Oswald. The result, ten years later, was that young Russian-speaking HARVEY had an American background and birth certificate. HARVEY was an ideal candidate to “defect” to the Soviet Union and work as an undercover agent who secretly understood Russian. HARVEY “defected” and two years later returned to America with a Russian wife and child. A year later this former “defector” was handing out literature in support of Castro and Cuba. Unknown to HARVEY, he had become the ideal candidate to frame for the assassination of President Kennedy. And also unknown to HARVEY were the activities of LEE Oswald in the summer and fall of 1963, when LEE was impersonating HARVEY and helping to set up HARVEY as the accused assassin of President Kennedy.

You really should visit the Harvey and Lee website if you haven't. It was newly reorganized this year: 

http://www.harveyandlee.net/

Jack White said it best when he said that anyone who does not accept the work of John Armstrong has to be fundamentally lacking in intelligence, and I agree.  There is just too much evidence to dismiss. It is way past the threshold of certainty.