There once was a man named Lee

Who stood in the doorway- to see 

His image was taken

Then Billy's was faken

To say Lee could have killed Ken-ne-DY

This is a very interesting perspective on the 2016 Presidential campaign and the rise of Donald Trump by OIC senior member Pat Shannan. It was written in September of last year and was quite prescient. It includes commentary about the JFK assassination.

SEPTEMBER 2015 MUSINGS

Is Trump Your Choice? The Bigger Picture

by Pat Shannan

 
Ever since I discovered the secrets of electronic vote rigging, I have had little interest in politics. Well, backtracking for a moment, I didn’t discover it, Jim and Ken Collier (younger than I but both now deceased, hmmm) were the first in Florida 45 years ago, long before the fraud had even evolved to its current electronic chicanery. I only uncovered the information by reading their book – VOTE$CAM – around 1994, and by following the research and evidence of others ever since.

American elections are a joke, a theater charade, which is nothing short of what Donald Trump has been exposing all summer. Truth terrifies the mass liars, and that is all that The Don has been spreading: truth. He says the same things over the Controlled Mass Media microphone to millions that we say to each other in the coffee shops, and his enemies don’t know how to stymie truth. The backroom training confab at Faux News in the hours before an interview has to be: “And if he says that, then you say this” . . . etc. 

The problem they then face is a new one for them. Because Trump doesn’t have to be politically correct, he answers honestly from the heart and not with something that might be more satisfying to voters back home. He has no voters back home. He is trying to wrest that attitude away from the powers in DC and put it back in the hands of We, the People. I believe that of this date, September of 2015, Donald Trump might just be for real.

But I did watch some of the televised debate last month, mainly to see just how far out on the back-stabbing limb the questioners might climb before Trump would chop it off – and that was pretty much what happened. Probably the most courageous response by Trump was his raising of his hand when the loaded question – obviously aimed right at him by Bret Baier – was Is there anyone on stage, and can I see hands? who is unwilling tonight to pledge your support to the eventual nominee of the Republican party and pledge to not run an independent campaign against that person. Again, we’re looking for you to raise your hand now — raise your hand now if you won’t make that pledge tonight. Trump was the only one to do so.

Of course, the big news of the next day was Donald Trump’s honest reaction, reflected as “a shill for Hillary and the Democrats,” etc., because an independent campaign by Trump would almost certainly split the conservative vote to the point of rendering a Republican win impossible.

But the bigger news to those of us paying attention was that Donald Trump had just received a promise from everyone else standing there that they were pledging their campaign-long support, from convention to election, if he should become the Republican candidate. This includes Sen. Rand Paul, who is definitely not a “chip off the old block” and seems to become a little more obnoxious with each public appearance, while Trump continues to snatch away more of Paul’s former followers.

But we’ve got news for ya’: he can’t make it – at least not the Donald Trump that is running in 2015. The same guy will not be allowed to reappear as President in 2017. It’s against the rules.
We’ve said it before, but it’s time for a reminder. November 22, 1963 was the day the rules for the new game were announced to the world and especially the American candidates. Every incoming new occupant of the Oval Office has the unspoken words of a half century ago ringing in his ears: “Just because we gave you the title of President does not mean you are in charge, Bub, and you’d better not forget it.” JFK, liberal as he appeared at the time, was just not part of the Brotherhood, and its members knew he could not be converted.

Statism is a religion, and like all religions, it involves doctrines. The official story of the JFK assassination instantly became a doctrine that all loyal Americans would accept and honor. Never mind the obvious facts of the impossibility of a single assassin, it became the new litmus test for patriotism. And shutting down the rational, observant, independent mind is what every loyal subject of the state does on command; and especially at a time of crisis. (Remember America’s blind and stupid trusting of those ridiculous 9/11 reports?)

Ronald Reagan, maybe because of being caught up in the excitement of fulfilling his greatest acting role ever, did forget it during the first nine weeks he was in the White House and (maybe because of Nancy’s Astrological influence) actually believed he was President of the United States. But then the Silent Brotherhood had a young nut named John Hinckley, Jr. remind him that he was not. But how many Americans know that John Hinckley, Sr., known as “Jack,” was Vice President George H.W. Bush’s close friend; and that he had another son, Scott Hinckley, who just happened to have a dinner engagement that same evening of March 30, 1981 with his close friend in Denver, Neil Bush? Thanks to the Internet, you can still pull up the tape of NBC News anchor John Chancellor announcing this “ironic coincidence.”

Reagan finally realized that he was the popular figurehead placed there to please the Brotherhood and nobody else. And for the next eight years, that’s exactly what he did. All things considered, it was more fun than dying in office.
Some other potential Oval Office Occupants have forgotten in the past, and the saga of Bobby Kennedy is the replay we might look for next June. By that time, the club members will have decided if Trump has become “one of us” or still “one of them” whose plane must crash before the national convention.

If they are confident that he has joined their Brotherhood (or at least agreed to cooperate with their New World Order plans), it will be entertaining to watch the mad rush by the current crop of debate losers scrambling to be the Vice Presidential Republican candidate on the Trump ticket; as it may prove to be the more valuable position in the long run, should Trump become another establishment-defying problem.

And remember this: Trump will not be making the decision. Just as JFK was forced to accept LBJ as his VP and Reagan was told by David Rockefeller to bring on George Bush, you can bet your house and car that if Donald Trump is the Republican candidate, he will be backed up by one of the Brotherhood’s own. It will be a four or eight-year policy insuring that Trump will stay in line.
And it always works, one way or the other. 

To follow Pat's blog, which is called Independent News International or INI, go to: 

 http://www.ini-world-report.org/

The new music video Doorway Man, based on John Lennon's classic song Nowhere Man has been quite a hit. It has generated over 120 Likes on Facebook.

Oftentimes, my enemies have portrayed me as having no support, that no one backs me, that I am an island. 

Of course, it's not true. I receive a lot of support and appreciation. But, more important than that, is the indomitable fact that the truth cannot be suppressed. It really was Oswald in the doorway. It really is him in the Altgens photo. And the truth of that is going to make mincemeat of the liars and fakers- regardless of my popularity. It's not about me. It's about what really happened. And what really happened is that Oswald was framed and innocent and standing in the doorway.  

They installed an image of Donald Trump at the CPAC conference. He wasn't there. He boycotted it. But, they wanted to show that he was still the focus.

Nobody can question that that's fake because he wasn't there. Nobody is claiming that he was. Everyone agrees that he wasn't. 
And it certainly looks very artificial.

Well, it's the exact same thing with the image of Lovelady at the desk in the squad room.

 He wasn't there. Nobody was there. The desk was empty. It wasn't really a desk. It was a table; a supply table. Why would they have a chair there when it was right in the lane of traffic? They wouldn't. They didn't. It's fake. 

Do you know when this was first noticed? It was in 1978 during the HSCA.  So, for 15 years, nobody noticed Lovelady in the squad room. In 1976, when Attorney Ken Brooten asked Lovelady, in an informal deposition, when was the last time he laid eyes on Oswald that day, he said it was when they broke for lunch. That was the exact same thing he said in April 1964. So, we have Lovelady on record twice saying that he never saw Oswald at the Dallas PD. 

It's all lies. Every image of Lovelady in a plaid shirt on 11/22/63 is a fake. He didn't wear a plaid shirt. He wore a short-sleeved striped one.

John Lennon's classic song Nowhere Man, from the Beatles Rubber Soul album released in 1965. has now been redone as Doorway Man, with yours truly, Ralph Cinque, doing the vocals. It is most fitting considering that John Lennon, like John Kennedy, was assassinated. And no, I don't think it was by another lone nut. I believe John Lennon was killed by those in power because of his peace activism. Please listen to this song and share it with others. Do it for John. Do it for Lee. And do it for John.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=joRXDSaU48U

Lots of people have helped themselves to the conclusion that the thumbprint on the Moorman photo occurred while it was wet and developing- but, that conclusion is wrong. Mary knows better, and she says, and has always said, that it did NOT occur then, that it occurred later, much later, while the photo was in the possession of the FBI- the second time they borrowed it from her.

Now, if you think there is anything innocent about that, then there is nothing remotely innocent about YOU. 

The fact that the thumbprint occurred later, when the photo was dry, and inflicted by the FBI is undoubtedly the most important and jarring but little known fact about the Moorman photo.

So, exactly how stupid do you have to be to believe that that thumbprint happened accidentally? You've got to be pretty damn stupid. 

They actually had the nerve to return it to Mary that way saying, "Oops, Sorry"? 

So, I'll tell you what I think. I think they must have done a psychological profile of Mary Moorman. They must have had experts weigh-in on how SHE would react. If they thought she was the kind of person who would react by saying...

"What the fuck are you talking about 'accidentally?' What the hell did he have on his thumb? A clean, dry thumb could NEVER have done that. I'm not buying your shit, and I'm telling the world."

...they never would have done it. They would have had to come up with something else. 

But, you see, Mary Moorman was NOT the kind of person who would react by saying that. Ralph Cinque is the kind of person who would react by saying that, but not Mary Moorman. And they knew that. They calculated that. They knew that Mary respected authority. They knew that Mary viewed the FBI and Secret Service as good guys, as protectors, as part of the great American establishment that makes America the greatest country in the world. She trusted them, and she believed what they told her. She accepted their claims because she could never doubt them. 

What was Mary Moorman's marital status at the time of the assassination? We know that she had a young son whom she lived with, but did she have a husband? If she was married, we know they eventually got divorced, since we know she acquired a different last name. But, was she divorced at the time?

It's an important question because if she was married at the time and living with her husband, then the FBI would have had to gauge her husband's reaction as well as hers to the idea of a dry Polaroid photograph being returned with a white thumbprint in the center of it. But, if there was no husband, if it was just Mary and her young son, then it would have been easier. 

We're dealing here with pure Orwellianism, and it's easier to carry out solo than in pairs. 

I am reminded of an experience I had in college selling Colliers encyclopedias. During the training, they told us that once you thought you landed a sale- where all that was left was to sign the contract- at that point, you wanted to KEEP THE HUSBAND AND WIFE APART. You separate them. You don't let them talk to each other privately because one or the other might talk the other out of it. So, they suggested going with something like,

"Harold, if you would go grab your checkbook, and Gladys, if you wouldn't mind going to get me a tall glass of water, I would greatly appreciate it. I am so parched from all this talking."

That's what they suggested. Another thing they suggested that always stayed with me is that when you were flipping through the volume on art, which had pages and pages of images, that you turned the pages slowly to show them, and then you stopped turning at the image of the Madonna and Child.

You let it settle there. After all, that is pure. How could there be anything wrong with an operation that was swimming in that?

I didn't last too long as a Colliers encyclopedia salesman.

But, what a decision it was to impose that thumbprint on the photo. So bold. So daring. So brazen.

But, they didn't do that. They did something entirely different. They replaced the whole photo and then installed the thumbprint on the replacement. They used that thumbprint to take out a whole person- Officer BJ Martin.

That's what they needed the thumbprint for. That's what Babushka's photo looked like before they turned it into the Moorman photo. 

A message from OIC senior member Tom Cahill, a U.S. veteran and member of Veterans For Peace:

Hello Everyone,

Below is the Documentary of our program, Muslims Are Not Our Enemy at the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center in Roxbury, Mass on Saturday, February 27. Please click on the link.

Please send this to everyone you know. If you are on Facebook please share with all your friends

If you know any Muslims, please share this with them so they know they have friends here in America who will stand with them against bigotry, hatred, harassment, intimidation and Islamophobia.

If you know of any Muslims who live in other countries, please send this to them and ask them to share.

This was a wonderful program, very powerful, please lets make this go viral. It is a message everyone should see and hear.

Thank you,

Smedley Muslim Friendship Committee

Boston event VFP Says No to Islamophobia –

54 minute video of

 

http://registremblay.com/veterans-for-peace-say-no-to-islamaphobia/

 

Organized by Pat Scanlon and the Smedley D. Butler Brigade of Veterans for Peace, 200 plus people attended an event at the Islamic Society of Boston Cultural Center on Saturday, February 27, 2016. Entitled, Calling All Veterans – Stand With Our Muslim Friends, a series of short presentations by veterans and community leaders made clear that hatred, bigotry and Islamophobia being directed towards the Muslim community is unacceptable. “As veterans who have served this country both in war and peace-time, we declare that this hatred, verbal abuse, and physical hostility being directed towards our Muslim friends,neighbors and co-workers is not in keeping with the American values of fostering brotherhood and sisterhood with our fellow Americans. This type of bigotry in 2016 is simply unacceptable, Un-American and we call for its immediate end.”

After the one hour event, lunch was served by members of the Islamic Cultural Center to all who attended.

It was not only an honor to document this event with photos and two videos, but a pleasure to take part in this historic event.

This is the entire event at 54 minutes and 23 seconds and is for all audiences. A shorter version is for VFP news and information purposes. -- Regis Tremblay