Joe Molina's home was raided the night of the assassination. They suspected him of being an accomplice of Oswald. It is ridiculous. Even Oswald wasn't an accomplice of Oswald, so how could Joe Molina be? Joe Molina and Lee Oswald never met. They never exchanged words. Joe Molina said so. And just think: If they really suspected Molina of collaborating with Oswald in the murder of JFK, wouldn't they have asked Oswald about him? But, they never talked to Oswald and asked him about Joe Molina. Doesn't that tell
you that they knew it was bogus? 

Was there any evidence of collusion between Oswald and Molina? Absolutely not. They claimed to base their suspicions on Molina's involvement with the G.I. Forum, which was a civil rights group for Hispanic veterans. They claimed it was rife with Communists. But, Joe Molina wasn't a Communist; he was just Hispanic. And even if he was a Communist, why would anyone assume that a Communist would desire to kill President Kennedy? Killing Kennedy meant propelling Lyndon Johnson to the White House, and Johnson was much more rancorous towards Communists than Kennedy was. If Joe Molina was a Communist, he would have wanted to protect every hair on Kennedy's head. 

So why did they really want to wreak havoc on Joe Molina? I can only speculate, but what I speculate is that he must have said something that challenged the official story of the assassination. Joe Molina was in the doorway. So, did he say that he saw Oswald in the doorway? That would definitely rise to the threat level that would warrant such drastic action. So, they stormed Molina's home, much the way the Gestapo stormed the homes of Jewish families in Germany.  The only difference was: no jack boots. Now think about this:

JOE MOLINA WAS INTERVIEWED BY JOSEPH BALL, WHO INTERVIEWED ALL THE OTHER DOORWAY WITNESSES. SO, WHY DIDN'T JOSEPH BALL ASK JOE MOLINA ABOUT DOORWAY MAN?

So, it's a situation in which the FBI never questioned Oswald about Joe Molina, even though they raided Molina's house in the wee hours of the morning; and Joseph Ball, the keeper of the doorway for the WC, never questioned Molina about the doorway and the identity of Doorway Man. 

It means they never really suspected Joe Molina. They were just harassing him for the sake of harassing him. They wanted to keep him busy and send him a message, to shut the pluck up.

So, did Joe Molina say he saw Oswald was in the doorway? 

Joe Molina was fired by the TSBD. But why? He was officially vindicated. So, why'd they have to fire him? 

Remember, the people in the know knew with certainty that Molina was not involved in the plot to kill Kennedy because it was their plot, and they knew exactly how it happened. The Dallas Police were just their puppets; their marionettes. They sic-ed them on Molina because they must have considered him a threat- to their official story. 

So again, I ask: did Joe Molina say that he saw Oswald in the doorway? 

There is no record of it, but they wouldn't make a record of it. To him or to anyone who said it, they would have just said, "No, you didn't, and you better not say it again."

And Joe Molina went on to never say anything. He has never entered the JFK debate in any way, shape, or form. He is still alive, and he still lives in Dallas, long retired. He went on to get a job with the Post Office, and after rising through the ranks there, he got a cushy job with the Labor Department. He has never said a word about the JFK assassination and what he saw that day. He has never taken a stand on any aspect of the case.   

Joe: you are not going to live forever. So, before you shuffle off this mortal coil, how about telling us what you know? Don't take your secrets to the grave, Joe. Join the JFK truth movement before your time runs out. And the truth is: they can't hurt you now. 



  

Bill Benton Moving along...I'd like to provide a solid round of applause for Ralph...because of his mention of the "9-11" false flag attack (planned and executed by the Intelligence Community), intended to be a pretext for these terrible wars in Afghanistan and Iraq (and a return to a "wartime economy"). Nowadays, there seem to be VERY FEW commentators who will acknowledge this reality...and during a story will blithely refer to the terrible Saudi terrorists who attacked our nation on 9-11!! Are these people "gatekeepers" or simply brain-dead numbskulls?

Manage

Like

 · Reply · 7m

Ralph Cinque Thanks, Bill. I have decided that I am going to speak frankly about 9/11 truth to anyone and everyone- in any circle. I say: stop the nonsense. This is like the Emperor who wore no clothes, and no one would admit it. Anyone with even half a brain knows that for those towers to have fallen the way they did, there had to be a planned, explosive demolition.

Manage

Like

 · Reply · 1m

‎Mitch Gander‎ to Oswald Innocence Campaign

29 mins · 

Is it known what time the 3 tramps were marched across Elm Street in front of the TSBD doorway? Thank you.

Ralph Cinque: That is very controversial, Mitch. Officially, it was about 2:00. However, there is a figure in the doorway who appears to be Oswald, and if that's him, then it had to be shortly after 12:30, and I mean like 12:34.

Granted, there is a lot of distortion there, but still, there are no deal-breakers: a slender guy, with a long neck, same shape head, shoulders back, and with the right height. 

I am really convinced that that is him. And if it's not him, then there was another amazing coincidence that someone else should have looked and dressed so much like him at that company. 

So, until something else surfaces to make me think different, I am going to assume that that was Oswald, and that particular Three Tramps photo was taken shortly after the shooting. And note that Jim Marrs maintained that there were two sets of Three Tramps photos taken, one soon after the shooting, and the other at 2 PM to conform with the story they wanted to tell, that it was later.  

There is a Youtube video in which Rob Clark, who is a troll who sounds like he's from the hood, trashes Oswald in the doorway. I bring it up because his arguments against it are so plainly stupid.  For instance, he dismisses "out with Bill Shelley in front" from the Fritz Notes on the grounds that "we don't know the question," that Fritz might have asked Oswald where his co-workers were at the time of the shooting, and Oswald may have told Fritz that they were out with Bill Shelley in front. 

That is ridiculous. Oswald was suspected of being the assassin, the lone assassin, of JFK. So, why would Fritz ask him where "his coworkers" were during the attack? And why would he expect Oswald to know where his coworkers were? And, his coworkers were scattered all over the place; they weren't all out with Bill Shelley in front. James Jarman and Harold Norman and Bonnie Ray Williams were up on the 5th floor. So, they weren't out with Bill Shelley in front. But, the most important thing is that this was a murder investigation, and Oswald was the prime and only suspect, and it makes sense that Fritz would solicit his alibi.   

Then, Clark brings up the time-worn argument that no one reported seeing Oswald out front. People ought to dwell on what happened to Joe Molina, whose home was stormed by Dallas Police on the night of the assassination. Why? Supposedly because they 
suspected he was involved with Oswald.

That, of course, was ludicrous. How could he be involved with Oswald when Oswald wasn't involved? It's unclear whether Oswald and Molina ever exchanged words- even once. The idea that they were involved in killing Kennedy together is ridiculous, and it was ridiculous then. 

But, somebody wanted to make hell for Joe Molina. But why? Did he say something that expressed doubt about the official story? He was in the doorway. So, did he start to say something? Something forbidden?  

The point is that you couldn't say it. You couldn't say that you saw Oswald in the doorway because if you started to say it, the Gestapo was going to come down on you like a ton of bricks. Look what happened to Carolyn Arnold. That naive young woman, who was only 19, thought that she could be honest, and she was honest: on November 26, when told the FBI that she was quite sure she saw Oswald standing AT the doorway shortly before the shooting. She said she was already outside, and she turned around, and that's when she saw him, peering through the glass.  The FBI agent who interviewed her designated a time of 12:15 that this happened, and he must have thought that that still left Oswald enough time to get upstairs, build the Sniper's Nest, build the rifle (using a dime as a screwdriver) and get in position at the window to start shooting. But, wiser men than him at the FBI realized that they were still screwed. So, they swept back into the TSBD in March and demanded signed statements from all the employees, including Carolyn Arnold, and by then, she realized that she had committed a faux pas, in spades. And forget in spades; make it in plutonium. 

So, Carolyn Arnold compliantly said she didn't see Oswald at all, and after saying that, she gave the correct time that she got outside, which was 12:25. 

The point is that it is meaningless that there are no published reports of TSBD employees saying that they saw Oswald in the doorway. If anyone tried to say it, they were quickly told, "You didn't see him because he was up on the 6th floor by then, and if you say it again, we are going to XXXXXXXXXXX..."  And you can fill that in with whatever you think they would have threatened, what J.Edgar Hoover's FBI would have threatened.

There is absolutely no doubt that it was Oswald in the doorway, and that's because the likeness to Oswald, and that includes both the likeness to him and to his clothing, are way, way, way beyond the threshold of adequacy to establish it. The idea that that there was this much likeness between Oswald and Lovelady, in the way they looked and the way they dressed on 11/22/63, is, in a word, preposterous. 

It is downright childish and stupid to think that this much likeness in physicality and dress were possible between Oswald and Lovelady. What we are seeing above is like stuffing the ball in  basketball, meaning that the score was made with authority. That is the same guy wearing the same clothes; period. And anyone who denies it now is either flat-out lying or is evading reality, big-time.  

    

Tom Steyer, a hedge fund billionaire, is spending $20 million of his own money to impeach Trump. He says that Trump is the worst President ever. 

Trump? The worst ever? I have a very simple way of rating Presidents: he who kills the least is best.  Trump has killed. He killed 8 women and 7 children when he sent his Seals to Yemen. And he has killed a lot more than that in Syria and in Afghanistan. 

However, George W. Bush killed many hundreds of thousands. That's absolutely certain and undisputed, but it is very likely that, between Iraq and Afghanistan, he killed over one million people. That's like the entire population of Austin, Texas, where I live. 

So far, Donald Trump has been the least murderous of any modern President. Both Clinton and Obama killed a lot more in their wars and actions. The same is true of the recently departed George HW Bush. But, George W. Bush, undoubtedly, takes the cake for having spilled the most blood, and almost all of it innocent blood. 

And realize that even when he killed, say, Iraqi soldiers, who were fighting back, he was mostly killing innocents. They hadn't done anything to us. Remember; we attacked them. They didn't attack us. They were just defending their country from an invader. And remember further, that the whole basis for both of George W. Bush's wars were lies. Lies, lies, lies. There was the lie that Osama bin laden planned and executed the 9/11 attacks from a cave in Afghanistan- while all the while on kidney dialysis. And there was the lie that Saddam Hussein was harboring weapons of mass destruction - which the U.S. has more of than any other country in the world, including nuclear weapons, which are the worst. It was only recently that I learned that the U.S. had explicit knowledge that Japan was suing for peace at the end of World War II, and we knew that BEFORE we dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The truth is: we wanted to drop those bombs to send a message to the Soviets that we were going to rule the roost in the post-war era. That's really why we did it. The Japanese were ready to surrender, and all they asked is that we not go after their Emperor Hirohito, because he was just a figurehead politically, with no real power, but he was indeed a spiritual leader.  

That was their only sticking point, but they even dropped that once we dropped the bombs. They made an unconditional surrender. But, you want to know something? We never did go after their Emperor. And he lived a long life too, until 1989. And he lived it a free man.

So, think about the irony of the one and only country that has actually used nuclear weapons, and against civilians, assuming the role of policeman of the world when it comes to nuclear weapons. 

According to Johns Hopkins University researchers, George W. Bush killed a million people in Iraq alone. The hundreds of thousands he killed in Afghanistan have to be added to it. And all of that killing, in both cases, was based on and justified by lies. Lies, lies, lies, lies, lies. 

And Steyer thinks Trump is the worst President? Money didn't make you smart, Mr. Steyer. In matters such as this, you might as well be a pauper because mentally, you are one.     

And George W. Bush: you are a mass murderer. You committed genocide. You hear me? I'm talking to you. 

This song is a prayer to God, but in jazz. It was written in 1940 by Lionel Rand and Ian Grant, and it was Nat King Cole who made it famous. And the one who accompanied him was the very gifted British jazz pianist, who was blind from birth, George Shearing. And, Shearing is the one who wrote the immortal Lullaby of Birdland.  But, here is my humble rendition of this fabulous song, Let There Be Love.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrHfHvBwSeA&feature=youtu.be

Former President George HW Bush has died. I think it's quite apparent that mentally, he was gone already. It's highly significant to us Oswald defenders because many and perhaps most of us considered him to be the most recognizable still living participant in the JFK assassination plot.

Is there proof that he was involved? That's a matter of opinion because proof in this arena isn't as cut and dry as proof in Mathematics. But, I am satisfied that he was involved, and it's due to the aggregate of evidence, including very suggestive photographic evidence, the report that "an independent oil operator from Houston" (Bush's moniker) was arrested briefly after the assassination after he came rushing out of the Dal-Tex building, apparently looking guilty, and that reached Jim Garrison; the fact that Bush claimed he was in Tyler, and that from Tyler he called the FBI to report a threat against Kennedy that he overheard in Houston, but that turned out to be baseless, plus it is implausible that he would wait until after Kennedy was shot and killed to report a real threat. Restated: if it had any plausibility, if it was more than a fake alibi, he would have reported it BEFORE Kennedy was shot. And then when you add in years of denying that he remembered at all where he was when Kennedy got shot, it results collectively in a tapestry of guilt. 

But, I think we have to keep it in perspective. I think there were much more monstrous people involved in the JFK assassination than Bush, such as Allen Dulles, who I think really believed that ANY MEANS whatsoever to advance the Cold War agenda was acceptable and justifiable. I think J. Edgar Hoover was downright evil and considered himself above the law and didn't have a speck of goodness or compassion in him. I wouldn't say that about Bush. 

Bush may have been the last surviving planner. Who's left? There is Ruth Paine, but she wasn't a planner. She was recruited to manage Marina and to help frame Oswald. But, having said that, I don't claim to know that she had explicit knowledge of the assassination plot. We know that Ruth Paine's mother in law was best friends with Allen Dulles' mistress. And, we know her estranged husband Michael Paine worked directly under Walter Dornberger, the German Nazi rocket scientist whom Dulles brought into this country via Operation Paperclip, at Bell Helicopter,. And we know that Bell Helicopter benefited tremendously from U.S. government purchases of its attack helicopters to fight the Vietnam War, which was escalated by Johnson after Kennedy was killed. Of course, Michael Paine is already dead. 

So, who else is left besides Ruth Paine? Well, Marina Oswald is left, and she was, by far, the most damning and damaging witness to Oswald of any during the Warren Commission hearings. But, she obviously wasn't a planner either.

So, are all the planners dead? Perhaps so.