It is very important to realize that JFK never spoke and never communicated in any way from the time he was shot in the back with the nerve agent high on the hill.  And Jackie said he didn’t. She said that when she first turned and looked at him that he had a “quizzical” look on his face. By frame 189 in the Z-film, we can see that she was turned and looking at him, and she never took her eyes off of him after that. She said he never spoke, and if he had communicated in any way non-verbally, she surely would have said so.

Rober Scott Cathey is currently spreading the falsehood that JFK pointed to his throat in the Z-film. In 62 years, no one has ever claimed that. He most certainly did not. In frame 255, his index finger is angled to where you could try to claim that he was pointing at his throat. He was not, and I’ll explain why.

In a personal exchange, Dr. David Mantik told me that the thing that was blocking JFK’s airway and putting him into panic in 225 was probably just a bolus of blood. And JFK quickly cleared it. Instinctively, he put his right hand over his mouth and coughed, and that cleared it. It was like a reflex.  After that, he was able to breathe fine. He was no longer concerned about his throat. That wasn’t his problem any more. So, what was his problem?  It was his spasmodic muscles. He was in pain! You should learn about the murder of Jane Stanford in Hawaii in 1905, where she was poisoned with strychnine, which is a nerve agent. As she was dying with a doctor by her side, she said that this was the worst pain she ever felt, and that it had to be the worst way to die.

I don’t know which nerve agent they used on Kennedy, but they all work by destroying the enzyme cholinesterase in the neuromuscular junction, which causes acetylcholine to persist and keep the muscle in perpetual contraction. Perpetual, that is, until you die, usually of asphyxiation from your respiratory muscles seizing up.

So, there’s no reason to think Kennedy was pointing at his throat in 255. It’s just the way his spasms manifested. He wasn’t even thinking about his throat any more.

And why should he have been? He was breathing OK. And he was being shot at. If he was capable of rational thought at all, he would have made that his concern: to survive the attack by getting down low and getting the driver to floor it.

And his spasms just got worse, and they spread. By the time he took the fatal head shot at 313, he was completely seized up.  

So no, JFK did not point to his throat, and he did not say or do anything that was intelligible. Mentally, he was gone before the fatal head shot.

If you think that JFK being hit with a nerve agent is farfetched, it is not. We can see the effects of it in the Zapruder film, where JFK had uncontrollable muscle spasms that started in his arms and spread to his neck, back, and shoulders. And he also had a complete mental collapse. JFK did not speak, nor did he attempt to speak, nor did he attempt to communicate in any way. He took no evasive action. He appeared to have no awareness or understanding of what was happening. He seemed to have the mental countenance of a young child. It was like Jackie was his mother.

How could all of that have happened to him from a shallow wound in his back that did no significant damage and a shallow wound in his throat that damaged his trachea on one side but got nowhere near his brain?

Since physical trauma can’t account for the effects we see, poisoning is the only answer.

And as I’ve shown you, we know that the gun existed to deliver the nerve agent, the CIA “heart attack gun” which the Church Committee probed in 1975. And, we know who the people were who figured out the chemical side of it. They were Nazi scientists at  Edgewood Arsenal.

Do you know about Operation Paperclip? Allen Dulles spent the war years in neutral Switzerland, where he befriended a lot of Nazis. And they impressed upon him that America needs to be worried about the Soviet Union because they are not your ally. And Dulles took it to heart. The Cold War began for him long before WW2 ended. And when it ended, he saved the lives of hundreds of Nazis by harvesting them for use by the United States. The biggest number were rocket scientists, like Kurt Debus and Wernher von Braun. But, the second biggest group were chemical weapons scientists, and it was they that Dulles set up at Edgewood Arsenal.

And at Edgewood Arsenal, they did notorious human experiments, starting in 1948, and many of them involved nerve agents. One of the things they did was get nerve agents into the body through the skin. They would lacerate the skin and put nerve agents in the wound, to see how long it took for effects to register. This is what I found in a synopsis:  “Nerve agents can produce rapid effects when administered in sufficient doses, particularly when absorbed through the skin. Symptoms can appear within seconds to minutes, depending on the dose and route of exposure.”

Within seconds? Within seconds, within seconds, within seconds. And that is what happened to JFK. The reason his back wound was so shallow is because the frozen missile was designed to burst upon entry, which was equivalent to an injection of the nerve agent into his bloodstream.  

So, we know, for an absolute fact, that they developed the weapon to do this, and they sought to find out how quickly effects would manifest if they got the nerve agent into the body through the skin, which is what happened. Here is a photograph from one of the Edgewood Arsenal “experiments,” which were done on soldiers and mental patients.

I am telling you that JFK was hit in the back with a nerve agent, high on the hill, and there is no doubt about it.

 On the left is a drawing of someone from a famous strychnine poisoning in Australia. You can see how the victim is in spasm, and not just his arms, but his legs. And I put the comparson of Kennedy, whose arms are in spasm. It was due to the nerve agent, and perhaps it was strychnine. I don't claim to know which one it was. But, that's how most of them work: destroying cholinesterase, which is the neurotransmitter that turns off muscle contractions.

 The issue of the number of head shots doesn't really matter to me. But, I will point out that the Zapruder film doesn't show it. I realize that the film was massively altered, but, why would they want to remove a head shot from the rear?  That was the story they were telling. So why take it out?

As for the autopsy report, it conflicted with what the Parkland doctors said. It reported the blowout wound in a different location, on the side of the head above the ear. And it reported a small "lacerated" wound to the right of the EOP and slightly above it, which was the very location of the blowout wound according to the Parkland doctors. The report did not refer to it as an entrance wound, although I presume that that is what they meant. They said it was 15x6 mm. Isn't that unusual for an entrance wound?  

And the only other thing are the x-rays, but Dr. Mantik says that they were altered. So, how can they be relied on? 

But again, to me, it matters little. What matters to me a lot is the chemical attack on JFK. So, I have prepared these succinct points about it. 

1. The very shallowness of the back wound suggests that it was not a metal bullet because of how rapidly it decelerated and stopped. However, ice is unstable and prone to bursting.  

2. That no bullet was found in the wound further suggests no metal bullet. And the arguments that it "fell out" are simply preposterous. It would have had to exit through the same holes in the clothes that were made going in. And, there were no forces, gravitational or otherwise, to make it fall out. There were no forces acting on the inert bullet to move it.  And after falling out, it got stuck in the seatback? Jesus, Mary, and Joseph, there was nothing for it to get stuck to. 

3. Could the bullet have been removed at the pre-autopsy? Theoretically, I suppose so, but the autopsy doctors reported no signs of tampering. And, the plotters had to know that the first doctors who would see JFK were going to be untethered ones.  Of course, the Parkland doctors did not discover the back wound, but they could have. And the argument from Physics that a metal bullet could not have stopped that fast still holds. 

4. The fact is that JFK shows the signs of intoxication in the Zapruder film. He exhibits a complete mental collapse, in which he lost the ability to speak or to communicate in any way. He took no evasive action. And it appears, from watching the film, that that he did not grasp what was going on. His mental breakdown cannot be attributed to physical trauma, which was relatively minimal at the time and included no brain damage at all.

5.  JFK's muscular dyskinesia is very apparent in the Zapruder film, starting with the way he brought his hands up to his throat, followed by his inability to put his arms down afterwards. Then after that, his tonic spasms only spread to neck, shoulders and back. It was probably very painful, and he withdrew completely, as he continued to seize up. It wasn't due to physical trauma, but rather, a nerve agent. 

President Kennedy really was attacked that way, and it was to immobilize him so that he would be a sitting duck when he reached the Kill Zone. 

 Do you realize how much LIFE magazine lied about the Zapruder film in 1963 and 1964?

I have both the November 29, 1963 edition and the October 2, 1964 edition, both of which have frames from the Z-film. What LIFE said in 1963 was that there were 2 shots. It just said that the “awful moment” came when JFK was out of view because of the freeway sign- which they and the CIA added. They did not describe what it did to JFK.  They just said that his wave turned into a clutch for his throat, as seen in 225. That was a lie because he stopped waving long before that- before they reached the phony sign.  Then, they claimed that Connally was struck by a separate bullet. And that was it; 2 shots. That’s all they mentioned.

Am I saying that they omitted the fatal head shot? Yes, that is what I’m saying. They just said that the President collapsed on his wife’s shoulder, and she cradled him in her arms. That is yet another lie.  You know, of course, that he was struck in the right temple, and it sent him veering “back and to the left.” He was like a ballistic missile flying at her, and her reflexes caused her to dodge him. You can see it in 315 where Jackie jerked her head leftward to avoid colliding with him. There was no thought involved because it happened so fast. It was just her reflexes. But, after she dodged him, she went back to him. And then she did her trek onto the trunk.

So, why did they exclude the fatal head shot? Was it just because they didn’t have a spare bullet for it? They cited just 2 shots because they knew about James Tague who got grazed from the missed shot. So, they had to save a bullet for him, although they didn’t mention him.   

Then, on October 2, 1964, LIFE changed their story. They claimed the Single Bullet for Kennedy and Connally. And they included the fatal head shot, now having a bullet for it. And they published 313, with the red cloud, and they claimed that JFK was hit in the back of the head and it blew out the front of his head. They said that the front of his head “exploded.” But, that was a lie. JFK’s blow-out wound was in the right posterior of his head, which all the Parkland medical staff demonstrated with their hands. There was no blow-out wound in front.

Now, I am going to tell you how they came up with the 313 they published in LIFE in 1964. It wasn’t the real 313. It was the instant before. They just painted the red cloud over the frame that preceded the fatal head shot. The reason the back of his head looks intact in 313 is because it was. And if you look at it closely, you’ll see that the front of his head isn’t blown-out. It’s just painted over in red.

But, they had a heap of work to do after that to fix all the frames that followed 313, which needed to show an intact back of his head. I don’t think it was done manually. I think they had to wait until computers advanced enough to do it digitally. If they had done it all manually with paint, they never would have sold it. The crudeness of it would have been apparent.

So, the editing of the Zapruder film took years. It was first shown to the public in 1975, and I bet it wasn’t ready until shortly before that.

But, someone please tell me why Americans are so obtuse. Why, in 1964, when LIFE showed them 313, didn’t they scream, “But wait! You had that last November. So, why didn’t you publish it then? Why did you exclude it? Why did you withhold it from us?”

The autopsy report was included in the Warren Report, which came out in September 1964. It described a blow-out wound on the right side of his head, mostly over the parietal bone, but also affecting the temporal bone and the occiput. It said nothing about the front of his head exploding. So, why didn’t people scream Bloody Murder about the discrepancy between what LIFE was claiming and what the autopsy said?

LIFE magazine lied flagrantly both times they published frames from the Zapruder film. And they changed their story from JFK collapsing into his wife to him being shot again, back to front, and blowing out the front of his head- which never happened. But, who altered the frames for them? I don’t assume their artists did it. I assume that the CIA did it, specifically Dino Brugioni’s team at the National Photographic Interpretation Center, who were all set up at Jaggars-Chiles-Stovall in Dallas on 11/22 altering the Altgens photo and more.  

So, they still claimed just 2 shots in 1964: the Single bullet that caused 7 wounds in 2 men, and the fatal head shot.

The claim that the front of his head exploded forward is outrageous. Imagine what it would have done to his face.

Here are 312 and 313. You can see how alike they are. If it didn’t occur to them to just paint their red cloud over 312 and call it 313, they were idiots.

 

 

 Do you realize that the first telling of the JFK narrative did not include the fatal head shot?

I am referring to the November 29, 1963 LIFE magazine, which has many frames from the Zapruder film. However, it does not include 313. Nor does it include JFK getting shot in the back high on the hill. There are just 2 frames of the limo before it jumps to 225, and those 2 frames are ones before Jackie turned her head to look at him.

The narrative implies that the “awful moment” occurred when he was invisible behind the sign, and they did not describe what happened. They just said that he clutched at his throat. Then, they claimed that Connally was struck (from a separate bullet) in the 230s.

Then, they claimed that Jackie became aware that something was wrong at 264, and that is ridiculous. And it was such an arbitrary lie because she was just as focused on him in 263, 262, 261, etc.

It then said that the President collapsed on her shoulder, and she cradled him in her arms. That is a lie.  What the film shows is him being struck in his right temple sending him veering “back and to the left.” He was like a ballistic missile flying at her, and what happened is that her reflexes caused her to evade him. You can see it in 315.

There was no thought involved. It happened too fast. It was strictly reflexes, like removing your hand from a hot stove. But, after she evaded him, she went back to him. And then she did her trek onto the trunk.

So, they excluded the first shot, which was the back shot. And they covered up the second shot, which was the throat shot, with the phony sign.  

And in this case, they didn’t want us to see, or even know about the third shot to hit Kennedy either, the fatal head shot. So, in this version, they only claimed 2 shots: one for Kennedy and one for Connally. But, James Tague was already known about. They didn’t mention him or the shot that missed, but they saved a bullet for it.

But, why didn’t they mention the fatal head shot? Was it just because they didn’t have a spare bullet for it? Or was it because it was a frontal shot? Perhaps it was both. But remember that this was before the Single Bullet Theory was concocted. Once they came up with that, it freed a bullet for the fatal head shot and left one for Tague.

Then, on October 2, 1964, LIFE changed the story a lot. They claimed the Single Bullet for Kennedy and Connally. And they published 313, with the red cloud, and they claimed that JFK was hit in the back of the head and it blew out his right temple. But, that can’t be right. JFK had a blow-out wound in the right posterior of his head, which all the Parkland medical staff demonstrated with their hands. There was no blow-out wound at the right temple, but that is what they claimed. And I don’t believe the red cloud is real.  

But, I want someone to tell me why Americans are so obtuse. Why, in 1964, when LIFE showed them 313, didn’t they scream, “Why didn’t you show us that in November 1963? How dare you exclude it?”

So, why did they include it? And why did they change their mind? If they made the decision not to include it in 1963, why did they reverse that decision and include it in 1964? I think the answer is that, with the Single Bullet Theory, they had a bullet to give to it. And their story was that the temple wound was not an entrance wound but an exit wound; hence the need for a blow-out there.

But, this conflicts with the autopsy, which stated that the blow-out wound was 13 cm at its longest diameter (which is over 5 inches). It said that the defect involved mostly the parietal bone, but also the temporal and occipital bones.

The autopsy also described a smaller wound in back, to the right and slightly above the external occipital protuberance. They didn’t state that it was the entrance wound, but that seems to be what is implied. However, LIFE magazine brazenly claimed in October 1964 that what 313 shows is a blow-out wound of the front of Kennedy’s head. They said, in plain English, that “the front part of his head exploded.” Of course, that is not true. It was the back of his head that exploded.

But again, the autopsy report was included in the Warren Report, which came out at the same time. So, why didn’t anybody scream Bloody Murder about the contradiction?

LIFE magazine was just a lackey for the CIA and the FBI. What explains all these discrepancies is simply that the United States government killed John F. Kennedy. That is the alarming and nightmarish truth. 

You can't exaggerate the significance and importance of Jackie being turned and looking at her husband before they disappeared behind the phony freeway sign in the Z-film. Here is frame 205 in which you can see it. It appears that he has his hand over his face, but he never did that. They did it. And the reason they did it was to cover up his face because he looked distraught from having been shot in the back already. You can tell that she is looking at him because her pillbox hat is pointing south, and her face is pointing north. I don't know how researchers missed that when they have been looking at the Zapruder film for 50 years.