It is glaringly obvious that the Garage Spectacle was staged. On Sunday morning, Dallas cops went on Dallas talk radio saying that they feared that Oswald was going to be attacked during the Jail Transfer. Oh really? Then why were they doing it? Why not move him in the dead of night without any fanfare and just announce the next morning that he had been moved? How smart did they have to be to think of that? They said that that were dozens of calls from people threatening to kill Oswald. Oh really? Why would someone bent on murder forewarn the police? How does that make sense from the perspective of the criminal? What’s in it for them? One cop even said that he answered a call in which he could tell that the caller was Jack Ruby. Oh really? Then why didn’t he go pick up Ruby? It’s a crime to plot to kill someone. But, there’s no chance that it’s true. Ruby’s roommate George Senator testified to the Warren Commission, and he said that Ruby made no calls before leaving for Western Union.

Why is there a discrepancy between what Ruby said and what Roy Vaughn said/ Vaughn said that that Lt. Rio Sam Pierce didn’t stop, that he came up the ramp, which caused Vaughn to check for traffic and then wave him through. They didn’t speak. But, Ruby said that when he was there, that Pierce was parked at the top of the ramp, and the officer on foot was leaning into the window talking to him. And, he said that he didn’t recognize the officer on foot, while he knew Roy Vaugh. Vaughn had been to the Carousel Club on police business, and he also pulled Ruby over once for a traffic violation, but he let him off with just a warning, since he was a “friend of the Department.” That’s what Vaughn said. And Ruby was very good at remembering the names of Dallas cops.

So, what explains the discrepancy? Vaughn and Ruby were there at different times. Ruby was there first. And once he was tucked away up on the 5^th floor, Vaughn started his shift guarding the Main Street ramp. The whole idea was to frame him for, negligently, letting Ruby in. In other words, out of stupidity, rather than plotting. But, it turned out that Vaughn wasn’t so stupid. When he was issued a reprimand for letting Ruby in, he hired a lawyer and sued the Department. He knew God-damn well that Ruby never slipped by him. And the Department settled out of court. That is, they paid Vaughn money in damages. Vaughn went on to become the Police Chief of Midlothian, Texas, a mid-sized city. And after that, he went on to become a Municipal Judge, which he did until he died. And he swore, to his last breath, that Ruby never got past him.

Why didn’t the Dallas cops handcuff the Shooter in the garage? Why take him somewhere without first handcuffing him? He was violent, right? He killed somebody, right? So, why not get him in cuffs immediately. And their story was that after getting him into the Jail Office, several of the penguins, I mean, the detectives got the idea to handcuff him at the same time, but it was McMillan’s cuffs that went on him. They didn’t remove his jacket first. They just put him in handcuffs. Therefore, how is it that in the WFAA footage, which supposedly shows Ruby being taken upstairs for the first time, he is in just a shirt and no jacket?

The whole story is a lie. Ruby didn’t kill Oswald. He was just tricked into believing that he did. The Dallas Police killed Oswald. And I don’t say it was their idea. Rather, it was an order that they got from LBJ.  He was the Commander in Chief, and all Fritz’ men were WW2 vets except for Charles Dhority. When the Commander in Chief gives you an order, you obey it.

Why did the cops have the ambulance go all the way down to the Pearl Expressway, only to come back on Main from whence they came? They made a big loop. Why did they do that? To kill time so that Oswald would bleed out.  They had to make sure that it would be too late for doctors to save him.

Again: the whole story is a lie. The Dallas Police killed Oswald, and they tricked Ruby into believing that he did it. It had to be one of the worst things any Police Department ever did. It was the monstrous end to a monstrous weekend.

 I got to do another song with the legendary guitarist Rick McRae, who is the lead guitarist for George Strait. The song we did is the classic Bob Dylan tune, DON'T THINK TWICE IT'S ALL RIGHT. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iznhYIVBmb8

 DOVEY’S PROMISE is now streaming on Tubi, where you can watch it for free. It is the true story of the Towpath Murder Trial of 1965 in which the victim was Mary Pinchot Meyer, the lover and very close confidante of JFK. She was brutally murdered 11 months after he was. Right away, a poor, hapless black man, Raymond Crump, was arrested and charged with the crime- even though there was not a speck of forensic evidence against him. The famous Civil Rights lawyer Dovey Roundtree went to see Raymond at the DC Jail, and she was so convinced of his innocence, that she offered to defend him for one dollar.

And thus began the Trial of the Century which put Dovey Roundtree up against the entire U.S. Department of Justice. It wasn’t a fair fight- but they asked for it. That tiny, little, deeply religious woman gave them hell in the courtroom. I have the transcripts of the trial, and I wrote the script from it.

And let’s face it:  this is suppressed history. It is all wrapped up in the dirty secret that the CIA murdered JFK in Dealey Plaza, and then 11 months later, they killed Mary Pinchot Meyer to cover their tracks. And if not for Dovey Rountree, they would have the won the case and put Raymond Crump to death without flinching.

But, they never dreamt that he was going to get Dovey Rountree to be his lawyer, and that was their undoing.

It's been 60 years, but the spin that government and media give it is that, even though he was acquitted, Raymond Crump was guilty. Well, that is impossible. You can’t even conjure up a motive for Crump. And he had a rock-solid alibi because his consort, a woman named Vivien, confirmed to Dovey Roundtree that she was with Raymond at the time- cavorting. Vivien was unwilling to testify because she was married, and she was afraid her husband would kill her. But, Vivien did provide an affidavit that Dovey filed. The Prosecutors definitely knew about it, and they could have easily gone to Vivien themselves- to test her credibility. But they didn’t. They ignored it.

And there was another piece of very exonerating evidence, which is that the FBI determined that Crump’s jacket never contained a handgun because it would have deformed the pocket and left residues. The case should have been dismissed on that basis alone.

The CIA murder of Mary Pinchot Meyer was such a monstrous evil, and its cover-up continues to this day.  So please watch Dovey’s Promise and encourage others to watch it. It’s free! You can help me spread the word about it without spending a dime.

https://tubitv.com/movies/100039797/dovey-s-promise

 What is wrong with people? Don't they know anything about vision? That you don't just see straight ahead, but you also see to the side? Do you want to know how far you see to the side? It's about 180 degrees. It's called peripheral vision, and it is particularly sensitive to movement. And of course, the Shooter was moving.

There is NO WAY that Oswald and Graves did not see the Shooter, who was James W Bookhout pretending to be Jack Ruby. Oswald and Graves are just faking that they are unaware of him. It’s all an act. The whole thing was theater.

 

And poor Oswald was tricked into doing it. I'm sure they told him that they believed him, that he was innocent, but they needed to fake his death in order to protect him. And he,
unfortunately, trusted them and went along with the ruse. However, he was not shot in the garage. He was shot in the Jail Office afterwards.

 

This photo was published in LIFE magazine on November 29, 1963, and people should have known instantly that it was staged, and that everyone in it was acting. The whole story of how
Oswald died is a lie. He wasn't killed by Jack Ruby, but rather, by the Dallas Police, with the help of the FBI. Even the Secret Service pitched in because SS Agent Forest Sorrels babysat Ruby up on the 5th floor while they were busy putting on the Spectacle, while other SS agents had taken custody of Marina Oswald BEFORE Oswald was killed.

Do you remember that weird story, where LIFE reporters took Marina to Dallas to visit Lee on Saturday but then, instead of returning her home to the Paine house, they inexplicably settled her into a hotel on the outskirts of Dallas, the Executor Inn, and that's where Secret Service agents took over. Marina never returned to the Paine house again. How could they confiscate the wife of a defendant? It's simple; they knew the defendant was going to be dead.

 Did Jackie Kennedy speak to her husband during the assassination? I did a Yahoo search about it, and this is what Yahoo generated:

"Jackie Kennedy did not explicitly state whether she tried to talk to her husband, President John F. Kennedy, during the assassination on November 22, 1963. In interviews and accounts following the event, Jackie described her feelings and actions but did not confirm any attempts to speak to him during the shooting. Some historians and biographers suggest that her instinct was to shield him rather than communicate verbally in that moment of crisis. Overall, while Jackie Kennedy's immediate actions are documented, her specific attempts to communicate with JFK during the assassination remain unclear."

 Notice how overly defensive that is, that it goes overboard in making excuses for her not talking to him.

 I have to think that she did talk to him because it would have been insane if she didn't. When there is a crisis, when a person is obviously struggling and in trouble, and you're trying to help him, you speak to him, as in "Jack, what's the matter? What happened? Are you sick? Are you hurt? What's wrong?" She would have done that instinctively. Anyone would. He was her husband. Of course, she would try to solicit information from him about what was going on with him.

 And let's remember, that after he was dead, and I mean after the fatal head shot, which effectively killed him, even though it took a little while for all life signs to cease, then they admit that she started talking to him, including "I love you, Jack." But, she would not have waited until then. Her first response would have been to query him about what was going on.

 So, I think she spoke to him, and I think that any honest, rational person will concede that she must have. And I think an effort was made to delete any statements she made about having spoken to him prior to the fatal head shot. They didn't mind reporting that she spoke to him AFTER the fatal head shot because he couldn't possibly respond then. But, let's go back to the beginning when she first turned and looked at him and saw that he had a "quizzical" look on his face. That is when she first would have said, "Jack, what's wrong? You don't look right." And I believe that's what they deleted.

 So why did they delete it? It's because it added another component of derangement to JFK's behavior. We know that JFK exhibited bizarre muscle spasms after emerging from behind the phony sign in the Zapruder film. We know that he never said anything, and Jackie was very clear about that, that he didn't speak or make a sound. And we also know that he never looked at her or made eye contact with her. We can see that with our own eyes. But, her speaking to him, and undoubtedly asking him questions, and him not responding? Not answering? Just ignoring her? That is yet another manifestation of JFK's severe cognitive impairment. Yet, he had suffered no brain damage to that point. His injuries were limited to a shallow, harmless wound in his back, and a shallow wound in his throat that damaged his trachea but did nothing to his brain. He had suffered no brain trauma. So, how could his relatively minor physical wounds have caused him to lose his cognitive ability completely?

 This demands an answer, and the only answer is that he suffered a chemical, attack that shut down his brain. His inability to respond to her when she spoke to him; his inability to focus on her when she looked at him; and his inability to communicate in any way, or to show any sign of awareness, alertness, and lucidity, is proof-positive that he was utterly gone mentally. And it was most certainly not the result of physical trauma.

 Look at this poor guy: all contracted in painful spasms due to a nerve agent and lacking the mental wherewithal to communicate or in any way, or even to acknowledge, to the slightest degree, the attention he was getting from his wife. The extremeness of his derangement is so apparent, and I lambaste the entire medical community for choosing not to see this very obvious pathological manifestation. Shame on them.

 Stefano Cardarelli sent me this other version of the Oswald shooting that is seen less often. I believe it is the 2^nd KRLD film. He sent it to me because it does not contain the hat falling off, and the Shooter’s bare head being exposed and then covered up by Detective Miller.

And I first want to say that, in that film, I don’t think the head that we see is real. I think it’s art. The Shooter was FBI Agent James Bookhout, and knowing that his son Jim has a thick, full head of hair, he probably did too. The incident was definitely real, but they doctored that head to make Bookhout’s head look like Ruby’s.

But, in the other version, which you can watch below, they were able to remove the incident of the head-covering completely.  You should watch it, but I want to give you some bullet points about it first.

1 Oswald turns his head and looks directly at the Shooter just as he starts rushing in. It proves that Oswald was in on it; that he was acting. I think they must have told him, “We believe you, Lee, but we can’t just let you go because someone will come gunning for you. We have to fake your death first.”

2 The Shooter crosses right in front of Graves, who didn’t see him because he was looking down? That is ridiculous. Graves had to have seen him, and he was just pretending not to. The physiology of vision says he must have seen him.

3 Fritz not starting to react until after the shot and the commotion is another piece of bad acting. Fritz had to be aware of it instantly.

4 Why would the Shooter dive into the swarm of police? Isn’t it a strange behavior? I bet it’s never happened before or since in the history of crime. But, I know why he did it. It was to get covered up.

5 From there, it’s all noise, chaos, and pandemonium. It’s like a magic trick, where Bookhout and Oswald were there, and then they were swifted away, but we don’t see how. We just see the wall of bodies of the men who did it, or as I call them: the Penguins.  

It was all an act, and Oswald was NOT shot in the garage. The Garage Spectacle was all theater. Oswald was shot afterwards under controlled conditions, with surgical placement of the bullet. I assume they knocked him out first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orJ1AGAn4OQ

 The medical profession betrayed JFK. When they saw, in the Zapruder film, that he was coming down Elm Street, smiling and waving, and then, after being shot, he had no capacity to speak, to communicate, to respond, or even to be aware of what was happening, they should have realized that there was something terribly wrong with him that his physical trauma could not explain.

Do you understand that he became totally helpless? It was like he was suddenly severely inebriated to the point of complete mental collapse. Yet, his physical trauma was limited to a very shallow wound in his back, that involved no vital tissue, and a wound in his throat that damaged his trachea on the left side, but it did no harm to his brain.

So, there is no excuse for him being in that totally debilitated state.

That morning, he spoke to a gathering of people outside his hotel in Ft. Worth. Then he went to the breakfast in Ft. Worth where they gave him the cowboy hat. He spoke there too and he was lucid, intelligent, and funny.

Then, he was fine when he arrived at Love Field. He interacted warmly with people at the airport, shaking their hands. Then he was fine in the motorcade.

So why should he have completely lost it on Elm Street? Where he couldn’t speak, react, or respond?  How could that have come about from relatively minor wounds that were far from his brain?

And you can see it in his face, in his countenance, that he was mentally gone.

Then, there was his spasmodic muscles that his physical trauma can’t account for.  The weird spasm of his arms bothered Jackie so much, she put her hands above and below his elbow and pressed down on his arm to coax it down. You can see it here.

It was futile, but she had to try. HE WAS FROZEN! He was like a pillar of salt! And it was not from physical trauma. It was the effect of a nerve agent.

Don't you understand that JFK in the Zapruder is bizarre? He is a freak show! He is grossly pathological, and doctors are supposed to be trained to recognize pathology. Yet, none of them did. Why? In most cases fear; and in a few cases, complicity. Well, I've been a doctor my whole adult life, and I am not afraid. I will tell you that he is showing extreme impairment of his neuromuscular system and severe mental derangement, and it was due to poisoning, not physical trauma.

That first shot, taken from the 2nd floor window of the Daltex building after he completed the turn, which struck him in the back, high on the hill, before the Croft photo was taken, contained a nerve agent. It may have contained more than that, but it definitely contained that. And it caused JFK's bizarre muscle spasms and his complete mental collapse, that are so apparent in the Zapruder film.