Here is a Facebook post by one Chris Simondet. Look at the term he used:

Kennedy-killers. I do believe I invented the term, and I am pleased to see others use it. I like to call a spade a spade, and that's what our enemies are: traitorous, blood-soaked Kennedy-killers. And I don't mean it symbolically or figuratively. I mean it literally. Because, when you aid and abet killers- even after the fact- you are a killer. You have blood on your hands. And they are aiding and abetting the killers of John Kennedy 50 years later. So, refer to them as Kennedy-killers. It is what they are. 

James K. Lambert has produced a documentary film that defends the official story of the JFK assassination, and the title of it is: CONSPIRACY THEORISTS LIE. You can watch the trailer here:

http://nomagicbullets.org/watch.html

It comes out this fall, in time for the 51st anniversary. I don't know how he plans to distribute it. I can't imagine it will be shown in theaters. If Tom Hanks couldn't sell a movie about JFK officialdom (Parkland, which bombed badly) I doubt that James Lambert can. So, I suspect that it will just be an online thing, 

This man has training in documentary film-making, and he also teaches in the field of Media. But, there isn't much to the trailer. It's an appeal to Americana (love for America) with clean-cut, polished cadets singing in perfect harmony at the 50th anniversary gathering in Dealey Plaza last year. And then it breaks to a scruffy CT who is arguing with Lambert about Johnson's motives for killing Kennedy and more, to which Lambert  responds: "Much of what you're saying isn't true." And that's it. That's the end of it.  

I'm not a film-maker, but I have penned two scripts, and I don't think that this trailer was well done at all. Even if I were an LN, I first wouldn't appreciate being patronized with all that tear-jerking Americana stuff. It doesn't lend anything to finding the truth about what happened on 11/22/63. Personally, I don't think a government is anything that anybody should love. And I mean any government, and certainly not this one.  But, even if you disagree, brandishing love of America does not in any way advance JFK truth; it is irrelevant. In other words, Lambert is just playing the patriotic card. 

And I didn't recognize the CT that he argues with at the end, with the CT doing most of the talking. He spoke of the conflicts and resentments that LBJ had with Kennedy as a motive for his involvement in the murder, and he spoke of Kennedy's resolve to weaken the Federal Reserve. 

Well, both of those things are true. One of our senior members, Phillip Nelson, wrote a book about LBJ entitled LBJ: Mastermind of the JFK Assassination which I have read: twice. 

And regarding the Federal Reserve, I heard Judge Andrew Napolitano say on national television, "The last President who stood up to the Federal Reserve was John F. Kennedy, and look what happened to him."

That was a couple of years ago, and within a few months, his program, Liberty Watch, got cancelled even though it had high ratings. But, I remember thinking to myself at the time: "WTF! That is some statement to hear on prime time television." 

But, I have to give the devil his due. Lambert was quite clever. That's because the singing cadets seemed so peaceful, so harmonious, and so elevated; they were like the Mormon Tabernacle Choir. But, the CT was scruffy and routy; he talked fast and furious; he was aggressive; not physically of course, but he seemed zealous, maybe even over-zealous. He wasn't calm, like the cadets. He wasn't soothing, like the cadets. He didn't rise to a higher level, like the cadets. He seemed combative and abrasive. Maybe even fanatical is the right word to describe him. It was his belligerence that was being showcased and contrasted with the fine a cappella voices of the cadets singing for their beloved country. 

As political propaganda goes, it was textbook. You could call it Stalinist if you prefer "motherland" or you could call it Nazi if you like the sound of "fatherland" better. It doesn't matter. Take your pick. Either/or, that's what Lambert is selling. The trailer offers NOTHING of substance on why we should believe the official story of the JFK assassination. 

I doubt that the film will go far. In fact, I suspect that the high and mighty would like to see the 51st commemoration be quiet and subdued. They don't want a lot of fanfare. But, I am calling your attention to it because I think that we JFK truthers may be able to use this film to our advantage. I think it could be a springboard- for us.

The nice thing is that when the Prayermanites are completely shot down by the weight of the evidence and that of that obese guy they're backing, the barriers to Oswald being in the doorway are still going to be lifted. They can't go back to saying that Oswald couldn't be there because of blah, blah, blah. They got him to the doorway, and there he shall stay, as the Altgens Doorman.

What it means, Backes, is that once you're ready to bail on Prayer Man, you can't go back to saying that Oswald couldn't be outside, that he was somewhere in the building or wandering around the building but not outside. He's outside. He's in the doorway. And that door is now closed. There is no going back inside for him. 

  

Maybe not, Sean. And, he isn't Oswald either. 

A fool made this collage to show that Prayer Man's shirt is a match to Oswald's. 

But the shirt being shown isn't Oswald's. Can't you see that it has all its buttons? But, Oswald's buttons were mostly missing. 

And look at the whole lay of the shirt. That's just an ordinary shirt but Oswald's was anything but. There is not a single image of Oswald in which his shirt looks like that. Oswald's shirt had the lay of a jacket. 

There is no way that obese guy can be Oswald anyway, as Oswald was lean and slender. And, he was angular in his body shape, not round like a ball. 

The Prayer Man nonsense has got to stop.

This poster is by Randy Gunter. Notice that he says films, plural. Not just the Zapruder film, but other JFK films were tampered with. That's tampered with as in changing their content. This is in contrast to the stupid Backass who says that every JFK film is as pure as the driven snow. 

This was my response to a Prayermanite who thought he was helping Oswald.

Well, you are never going to help Oswald unless you get him right in the doorway. The notion of Oswald being Prayer Man is mockery. It mocks the idea of him being in the doorway since absolutely nothing matches between him and Prayer Man. In fact, you haven't even said anything like, "Look at X. See how well Oswald's X matches Prayer Man's X." And neither has Dan. Here are some examples: "Look at the shirts. See how well Oswald's shirt matches Doorman's shirt. Look at the t-shirts. See how well Oswald's t-shirt matches Doorman's t-shirt. Look at the slender builds. See how well Oswald's slender build matches Doorman's slender build. Look at the ears. See how well Oswald's ear matches Doorman's ear." Get the idea? That's how it works. That's how you plumb the thing. And when you plumb it that way, you realize, beyond any doubt, that Oswald was Doorman.