I congratulate you on the research and thoroughness of the subject covered. I've been a
long-time believer that Oswald was a patsy (scapegoat) and innocent at least of the shooting(s).
I have been to Dealey Plaza a few times. Cannot believe I had not heard of Doorman, etc? I
thought I had known it all before, but now I am convinced that Lee was in the doorway at that
time. Was any of this brought out in the movie JFK? What makes me think it is Lee is the
presence of the face of the Carl guy and the extended hair of the black woman, which I believe
are covering up both the watch and the tattered shirt down low, as seen in the police station
photos! Good job Ralph! Cannot believe this piece is not out there as proof positive it was not
Oswald on the 6th floor. Great job, and thanks for a great read! James Files" interview and
admission are quite compelling as well. I think both of these things together have to be a
slam-dunk for Oswald being innocent. It was likely a CIA/Mafia hit, with Oswald as scapegoat,
and Johnson knowing about the general plan. That's my opinion.
What we see of Carl Jones in the Altgens photo is fake. Fake,
fake, fake. They put it in there, as my correspondent said: to cover up
the tattered shirt of Oswald, as seen in the police photos.
Realize that if that tatteredness had shown, the jig would have been
up. It would have been obvious to everyone that he was Oswald.
It's not like Lovelady's shirt was also tattered.
Carl Jones was snug against the wall, and he was facing west
throughout- just as we see him in the Wiegman film. He was never
looking east. That came hours later when he was leaving, as
James Altgens and Phil Willis were on opposite ends of
Dealey Plaza, shooting from opposite angles, so how could they
both capture the exact same angular shot of Carl Jones? They moved
the Willis image into the Altgens photo in order to cover up that
tattered shirt of Oswald. I have no doubt about this.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.