Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

It really is bizarre that the Mainstream Media, which has always and often trashed "conspiracy theorists" as psychologically deranged, would eagerly, and without comment, discussion or dispute, promulgate the conspiracy theory that Jack Ruby had foreknowledge of the JFK assassination and went to Dealey Plaza on 11/22 "to watch the fireworks." 

Ruby always maintained that he did not go to Dealey Plaza to watch the motorcade, that at the time he was at the Daily Morning News building discussing his cabaret ads with their advertising manager, and discussing coverage of his clubs with their entertainment director. 

Now obviously, if Jack Ruby had foreknowledge of the JFK assassination, then he must have colluded with whoever did it. 

So, what did the Mainstream Media mean to imply when they spread that story? Well, it had to be either that Ruby was involved with those who killed Kennedy or with Oswald. And it's hard to know which it was because they didn't elaborate. They didn't make any comment at all. They didn't assess the credibility of it. They just reported that there was an FBI document from 1977 in which this was laid out, that a career criminal/FBI informant, Bob Vanderslice, was invited by Ruby to go watch the fireworks with him in Dealey Plaza. 

Then, there was also this:

"Vanderslice told the FBI that after Ruby was arrested for killing Oswald, he was also arrested on an unrelated criminal charge and got to know him better at the Dallas County Jail."

Ruby was totally and completely segregated from other prisoners at the Dallas County Jail. He engaged with his jailers, his attorneys, and his visitors and that is all. He didn't eat with the prison population. He didn't do anything with them. So that line is complete and total bull shit. 

And the whole thing is complete and total bull shit. And you should learn a lesson from it, that whenever the Mainstream Media promotes a conspiracy theory, it MUST be a false one. 

Numerous witnesses confirmed Ruby's presence at the Dallas Morning News when Kennedy got shot. There is absolutely no doubt that he was there. And yet, there are numerous reports of Ruby sightings in Dealey Plaza. It is so Machiavellian. The plotters who planned the whole thing thought ahead of time about how to mislead the doubters, how to point them in the direction that was most favorable to them, the plotters. So, they took the false story of Ruby shooting Oswald and added more falseness to it, immersing Ruby in the JFK assassination as well. And that was to cement the idea that, oh yes, he killed Oswald all right, he sure as hell did. Ruby was Mafioso. he was a killer and a pimp; he threw people down the stairs like it was a habit, blah, blah, blah. 

And, it's the hypocrisy of it all that gets me because 99% of the time, they are ridiculing conspiracy theorists as mental cases, and yet they clasp onto this one and broadcast it like breadcrumbs to  pigeons. The contradiction of it all is breathtaking.

Ruby was innocent, completely and totally innocent. He knew nothing. He did nothing.  The same people who killed Kennedy killed Oswald. And it was planned well in advance that Oswald would be promptly killed. He had to be promptly killed because the false evidence they assembled against him could never hold up. It couldn't hold up in court, and it couldn't hold up once Oswald spoke to an attorney. FROM JUST ONE MEETING, A LAWYER WOULD HAVE REALIZED THAT OSWALD WAS FRAMED AND INNOCENT, AND THAT AUTHORITIES WERE NOT ONLY LYING BUT USING FALSE AND FABRICATED EVIDENCE. 

So, they had to kill Oswald before he spoke to an attorney. They knew that going in. They knew it well in advance. And they did kill Oswald. They didn't get Ruby to kill him. They didn't need Ruby for that. They were perfectly capable of doing that. They just needed Ruby to take the blame for it, that's all. Ruby, like Oswald, was a patsy, and the only difference between them is that Oswald was of sound mind while Ruby was not.