Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is staggering. You know that the United States attacked Afghanistan in October 2001 because the Taliban government refused to hand over Osama bin laden. But, what is the evidence that Osama bin laden was responsible for 9/11? It's mainly a video tape which purportedly shows bin laden boasting and bragging about the attacks he planned, and in a jovial manner. The problem is that the guy in the tape is clearly not bin laden. On the right is an undisputed photo of bin laden from 2001. You can see that he looks much older than the other guy, and he's much thinner. bin laden was sick. He had numerous ailments, the most serious of which was kidney failure. 

   
So, can you see that the guy on the left is not bin laden? You can see that his face is fatter and that he's younger, right? But, here's the thing that leaves me staggered. Supposedly, the video was found in a house in Jalalabad, Afghanstan in November 2001. BUT, WE STARTED BOMBING AFGHANISTAN IN OCTOBER. So, as phony as the video is, the U.S. government didn't even have it when they launched the war. They could not have been basing the war on that video. So, what were they basing it on? To this day, we don't know. And that war will be 18 years old as of October 7 with hundreds of thousands dead. 

And there's something else to consider: How do you think this crappy video would have held up in court? What do you think bin laden's lawyers would have been able to do to it? The fact that we released it tells you that BIN LADEN WAS NEVER GOING TO TRIAL. That was never part of our plan. We were never going to let it happen.