Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I showed you how in the Zapruder film, JFK STOPPED WAVING BEFORE HE REACHED THE SIGN.  And that means that he was shot because there is absolutely no other reason why he would have stopped waving. Now, I am going to show the Betzner and Willis photos because they also show that he stopped waving.

But, they show a lot more than that. We'll start with Betzner. 

If you look closely, you can see JFK directly below the sign. His image is very dark, and it makes it hard to see him. His image is NOT photographic. By that I mean, it has a crudeness to it. and it could very easily been altered with paint. Let's look at it closer.

So, you see Zapruder atop his pedestal. You see the freeway sign, which is properly oriented and not freakishly big, as in the Zapruder film. 

And if you look closely, you can see an obfuscation at the top of JFK's back on his right side. It's like somebody took a Sharpie and rubbed over it. I can't explain the crown-like whiteness over JFK's head in Betzner. Is that something that they did too? But, the extreme darkness on the right side of him is definitely obfuscation. It is NOT, as the Idiot McAdams claims, his jacket bunching up. Let me explain something to that blithering idiot: the only way JFK's jacket could have "bunched up" is if his suit didn't fit him, and JFK had enough money to buy finely tailored suits that fit him. Just look at the image on the right below. How could his suit bunch up? And if it were going to bunch up, say because it was too big, it would bunch up on both sides. The idea that it could bunch up on just the right side is ridiculous and preposterous. 

So, what we are seeing on the left- that dark overlay- was added to the photo. Certainly if JFK's arm was up waving, we would be seeing it. So, JFK had stopped waving, even though, officially, he was not yet shot. I say he was. 

Now, let's look at Willis, which was taken after Betzner. It is considered to be the last image of JFK before he got shot. 

Again, if JFK were waving, we sould see his arm up. And here, as in Betzner, JFK's image is dark and crude and unphotographic.

What stands out to me here is weird shape of his head. You're seeing a lot more on the left than the right, and the implication of that is that he had his head turned to the right. At this point in the Z-film, he's got his hand over his face.

How could JFK's head be above the top of the freeway sign in the Zapruder film? Look how high the sign is in Willis.

He is sitting in the well of the back of the limo. That sign is towering above people standing on the sidewalk. So, how could his head be above the top of the sign in Zapruder?

But, don't believe he put his hand over his face because he didn't. That's more art. And notice that he does not have his head turned to the street. He was just looking straight ahead and undoubtedly with a disturbed, stressed look on his face, which they covered up with the hand. 

So, the hand in Zapruder is fake, and so is the implication that he had his head turned to the right in Willis. They used paint to accomplish that. 

By this point, JFK was already in a rattled state from having been shot with the dart and with the drug or drugs seeping into him. They covered his face in the Z-film because his face must have shown that he was stricken. 

JFK was shot in the back high on the hill, just a little past the Book Depository and before the Croft photo was taken since he was already hit in that photo. That may be the most profound thing you can say about the JFK assassination, after the fact that Oswald was standing in the doorway during the shooting.