Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 

The top image is supposed to be the first showing of the Moorman Photo in a newspaper, which was on November 25, 1963, 3 days after the shooting. But, that is fake. It's the exact same image as the one below except that they softened the thumbprint as best they could. And then, they added a checkerboard light/dark pattern over the whole photo to reduce the visibility of the thumbprint even more. They made the whole thing splotchy so that what remains of the thumbprint doesn't stand out.  However, according to Mary, the thumbprint didn't happen until weeks later after they "borrowed" it. She said they kept borrowing her photo, over and over again, which is weird because they made a negative of it the first day. So, what did they need to keep getting hers for?  And finally, they returned it to her in the condition that we are familiar with, with the "accidental" thumbprint- along with their profuse apologies. 

There is no way that Mary took that photo. The huge size of Hargis compared to Kennedy tells you that the photographer was like this:

Now, the laws of physics tell us that that's where she was. It isn't debatable. You might as well deny that the sun rises in the east and sets in the west. It is out of the question that Mary Moorman let the Kennedys pass her and then shot them from behind. It's not just that it has little credibility; it has no credibility. Mary was waiting all morning. She starting looking through the viewfinder as soon as the limo made the turn at the top of the hill. And she never said that she let them pass her. She said that she took it when they were even with her. But, I think it's more likely that she took it a little before that. Why? Because she would have wanted to capture their faces. It's all about the faces; it always is. But, we have an image of someone taking a picture at that very time and from that very angle.

Bingo. That's when the Moorman photo was taken and by Babushka Lady. And she was not Beverly Oliver who was 17. Babushka means grandmother in Russian. Why would anyone call a 17 year old a grandmother? They wouldn't. They couldn't. They didn't. The daunting thing is that if they really did publish Mary's original photo then it may be possible to find an heirloom physical newspaper that has it.