Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 This is how the motorcycles looked in back, and note that it's Hargis in the foreground and Cheyney distant. We also see the wingman on the other side. So, the only one missing is BJ Martin.  

So, it had the white cannisters and then the black thing. What is that? A tool box? But now, let's look at the Moorman photo. 

Notice that that back of Cheyney's motorcycle is washed out, and it looks more like a riding lawnmower. It's hard to make out what that faint imagery is, and it's impossible to explain it. Few have noticed it, but Newman's missing left arm has been noticed, though no one has been able to explain it. However, we can see very clearly the jump seat or tool box or whatever it is behind Hargis. I drew a white arrow pointing to it. But, look at the location of his front wheel. Look how short the line is to it. The front wheel is not in line with the thing in back. And, unless he's driving into the curb, his front wheel should be in line with the back. But, looking at his front wheel, you can see that it is much closer to us, and that is why it is lower in the picture. Recall that height means depth in a photo. That front wheel is not Hargis' front wheel. If it was, he would be veering into the curb.  Hargis' front wheel should be deeper in the picture, in line with the back. It should be the same depth as that tool box. The front wheel we see is BJ Martin's front wheel. I think it will help if we compare both images again.

Can you see now that that front wheel is left of the back of the motorcycle, that they are not connected? They are not the same motorcycle. Below is a model of how that image looked originally before they added the thumbprint.

That's what it looked like, as captured by Babushka Lady, who was sent there to capture images of the assassination, and she was not Beverly Arnold.

Bingo. That's what the Moorman photo really started as, and it's not Mary's photo. Her photo must have been destroyed. Apparently, it showed something that they didn't want us to see. 

But, consider the facts. We know that JFK was shot in the back high on the hill, and I mean long before Mary Moorman would have taken her picture. Why? Because she wanted a close-up. Mary said that she took her picture simultaneous with the first shot. Yet, the court historians have glibly said the Moorman photo was taken right after the last shot, which was the fatal head shot. I don't believe that. I think it was taken right before the fatal head shot. But regardless, Mary took her photo much earlier, and that's according to Mary. She distinctly said that she heard two shots after she lowered her camera. But, what if Mary took her early picture before the throat shot? If that happened, then JFK was reacting to having been shot in the back but not the throat. So, he wasn't raising his hands to his throat and doing what we see in the Zapruder film. So, what was he doing? He was probably just looking odd, detached, not smiling, perhaps grimacing, and maybe Jackie was looking at him like something was wrong. It showed that he was affected by something before he entered the Kill Zone. And that's why they had to destroy Mary's photo. 

Finally, I will leave you with my contention that the location of Mary Moorman and Jean Hill in the Zapruder film is bogus. They weren't that low on the hill. And what I can offer as evidence is where Mary placed herself demonstrating. 

Officially, Mary was located right across from Zapruder, but the spot where they are standing is a lot higher than that. 

So, Mary's own photo got destroyed and replaced. She probably caught an image of JFK reacting to the back shot before he was shot in the throat. It had to look a lot different than the Moorman photo. And I suspect the way they got Mary to go along with it was with some do-re-mi, and I ain't talking show tunes.