Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, now you know that comparing the Garage Shooter to Jack Ruby in his mug shot proves that they were not the same man. And that's true regardless of the various talking points. Such as: "But, Ruby admitted doing it. He confessed." But, he didn't. Ruby accepted that he did it. Big difference. Ruby said that he had no memory of shooting Oswald and no intention to shoot him. He said he didn't have the slightest thought to do it- that whole weekend. He said that all he remembered was going down to the garage and being jumped by police. And at the time, he didn't know why. That's why he said, "What are you doing? You know me; I'm Jack Ruby. I'm not a criminal." Would he say that if he knew he just shot Oswald? Didn't he know that police frowned on that kind of thing? Ruby didn't find out that he shot Oswald until police dragged him up to the 5th floor and told him. And he believed them. Why? It's because he was a very submissive person who respected authority. He respected the Dallas Police. But, how can a person confess to doing something that they can't remember doing and no had thought of doing? It wasn't a confession; rather, it was a resignation. He just resigned himself to having done it. 

But, what about all the detectives and reporters who claimed to see Ruby in the garage? First, there were no reporters who claimed that. They learned it was Ruby the same way everyone else did; from police announcing it. Ike Pappas conversed with Ruby the day before, at which time Ruby gave him his card. But, Ike did not recognize Ruby in the Garage. 

Hugh Aynesworth was just 10 feet away. He said he saw the Shooter zip by him. But, he did not know he was Ruby until the Police announced it. And, he had recently eaten lunch with Ruby. The only ones who claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage were the detectives. But, they lied.  The killing of Oswald was a joint operation of the Dallas Police and FBI, and I am sure that LBJ put them up to it. I'm sure he told them the same thing he told others, that if they didn't do it, there would be a nuclear war and a hundred million would die.  

And finally, "But, millions saw Ruby do it on television." No. Millions saw a short, pudgy, middle-aged white man in a Fedora hat do it on television. But, that really isn't the crux of it. The crux of it is that for 59 years (or all their lives) people have been told, over and over again, and very matter-of-factly, that Ruby shot Oswald. And the only discussion that has been allowed is whether Ruby did it alone or was put up to it by the Mafia or the CIA.  THAT WHOLE DEBATE IS NOTHING BUT A SMOKESCREEN  to hide the fact that Ruby didn't do it at all.  Believe me, they don't mind a bit if you want to think that Ruby was in a big conspiracy. As long as you keep Ruby as Oswald's killer, they, the plotters, are as happy as larks. 

From the beginning, this has been a big psy-op, and I doubt there have been any bigger. We've all been like Pavlov's dogs in his famous experiments. It's time to wake up to the fact that Jacky Ruby was innocent. He was really just a poor Jewish man who had great devotion to his family and to his religion, who did not have a mean bone in his body. He was decent and generous. His capacity for rage? I'm sure it was less than mine. I consider Jack Ruby the most exploited victim who ever lived.  At least Oswald had the chance to defend himself, which he did vigorously. But, Ruby was just to out of it mentally to grasp what was happening to him. He died before ever getting a clue as to what was really going on. 

And to this day, people salivate over Ruby's statement about LBJ being responsible- as if he knew anything. Ruby didn't know a thing. It came from a book that Ruby was given to read: A Texas Looks at Lyndon by J. Evetts Haley. I've read it too. The gist of it is that Johnson put Oswald up to it, which is ridiculous. No one who wanted Kennedy dead would have relied on Oswald to do the shooting. 

And speaking of reliance, do you really think anyone would have trusted Jack Ruby to shoot Oswald? Ruby wasn't an assassin, and he wasn't even a marksman. Stop thinking it was easy as pie, that anyone could do it, and nothing could go wrong. Plenty could go wrong. What if Oswald got wind and took evasive action? What if in the struggle the muzzle got shifted, and Leavelle got shot instead? What if the bullet traversed Oswald and entered Leavelle? The bullet practically did traverse Oswald, although I don't believe it was fired in the garage. That was theater. They shot Oswald afterwards under controlled conditions and surgical placement. 

Ruby was out of his mind. He was a birdbrain; a dimwit; a bumbling idiot. Nobody in his right mind would have trusted him to shoot anybody, let alone be in the path of the bullet, as Leavelle was.  Would you really trust Jack Ruby to shoot a gun in your direction? Do you think Leavelle did? 

This was a huge psy-op in which they wrote a whole different bio for Ruby, making him a Mafioso, a hit man, a pimp, a gun-runner, and more. They came up with false sightings of him- in Florida, at safe houses, with Oswald, with Nixon, etc., and they are much like the false sightings of Oswald. 

Jack Ruby was innocent, and if you don't know that, then you are in the dark about the JFK assassination, and you might as well not know anything.