This combines two FBI statements that together and sequentially establish that Oswald went outsde to watch the motorcade. The first is by FBI Agent James Hosty, who wrote down by hand that Oswald said he ate lunch in the 1st floor lunchroom and then went outside to watch the Parade. The second is by FBI Agent Richard Harrison who interviewed Carolyn Arnold on November 26, and he wrote down that she said that she was standing in front of building, waiting to watch the motorcade, when she caught a glimpse of Oswald standing at the entrance. He was just inside the door, but the door and the whole entrance was clear glass; so, she could recognize him easily. He hadn't stepped out yet, but he was about to.
Harrison wrote that she left to go outside at 12:15, but that is not what she said. She said 12:25. And we have a document which she signed in March 1964, stating that it was 12:25. Harrison foolishly thought that making it 12:15 left Oswald enough time to still get up to the 6th floor in time to shoot Kennedy. But, smarter men than him at the FBI realized that 12:15 still put the kabash on the official story. If Oswald was at the doorway at 12:15, he could not have shot Kennedy at 12:30, and they knew it. That's why they went back to the TSBD in March to get a signed statement from her stating that she didn't see Oswald at all that day, in which they let her state the time accurately as 12:25.
But, my point is that these two statements go from one to the other. Hosty's statement confirmed that Oswald ate in the 1st floor lunch room and then proceeded to the entrance. And because the entrance was clear glass, Carolyn Arnold was able to recognize him standing there behind the glass.
And she was a 19 year old girl. I take the liberty of using the word "girl" because even though she was of legal age, 19 is still a teenager. It's still awfully young. A 19 year old girl is certainly not going to lie to the FBI, which is the American equivalent of the KGB. So, what she said about seeing Oswald at the doorway shortly before the shooting was certainly the truth.
When we combine this with all the photographic evidence of Oswald and Doorway Man, matching not only the person but the very unique clothing that Oswald wore, there isn't a smidgen of doubt that Oswald was him. It is futile and hapless to deny it, and doing so is just brash, brazen arrogance. It's over.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.