Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 There is a symphony of evidence that Oswald was innocent. The charges against Oswald, like the charges against Iran, were just Statecraft devilization, It starts with Oswald’s images in the Altgens photo and the Wiegman film, and realize that there were would have been more images of Oswald in the doorway if they hadn’t obscured the rest. For instance, why is the Towner doorway completely dark? If there was light in the doorway for Altgens and Wiegman, why not for Towner?  Same place; same time.

And don’t say the “L” word because I will ban your ass faster than you can say “Grass Knoll.” The likeness of the man and the clothing to Oswald are over the top.

But, let’s go down the list of other confirmations that Oswald was nothing but a patsy. First, he said he was outside, and he identified someone who was, in fact, out there and admitted to be. That’s Bill Shelley. There are no images of Shelly in the doorway, but that’s a problem for the Murderous State, not for me because there is no doubt that he was there. Apparently, they made a decision not to expose him in the doorway.  And if you haven’t done it yet, read The Spider’s Web by William Weston, who laid out the evidence that the TSBD was a CIA front company, a weapons and narcotics smuggling operation moving under the guise of schoolbooks.

https://educationforum.ipbhost.com/topic/6017-spiders-web/

So, Oswald used Shelley as his alibi. But, did they ask Shelley about it? Not directly. They never told him that Oswald said he was with him out front. They just asked him when was the last time he saw Oswald. And Shelley said it was during the lunch break, about Noon, on the 1^st floor. But, Oswald could only have known that Shelley was there by being there himself.

Second, we have Marrion Baker’s testimony that he saw Oswald moving through the anteroom of the lunch room at 12: 31 plus some seconds. Oswald was just getting to the lunch room then, which means that he wasn’t there at 12:30.  And Baker saw Oswald through the window in the door on the stairwell side where he was. And he didn’t say the door was moving. And since it wasn’t moving, it means that Oswald didn’t use it to get in the anteroom. It means he used the other door, on the office side. And that means that instead of coming own from the 6^th floor on the stairwell side, he came up from the 1^st floor on the office side. There can be no doubt about this because if Oswald had come down from the 6^th floor, slightly ahead of Baker, he would have run into Truly.

And let’s talk about Roy Truly, because he’s #3. So, when Baker was pointing a gun at Oswald, Truly showed up and convinced him that Oswald was harmless, that he couldn’t possibly have done it. He said, “he works for me.”  And keep in mind that involved not just him saying that, but how he said it. There must have been a real attitude displayed that Oswald couldn’t possibly have done it. But then, 20 minutes later, Truly went to the police all upset that Oswald had missed the roll call. Charles Daughterty had missed it too because he left, but Truly didn’t suspect him; only Oswald. And obviously, his attitude when he told that to the police was polar-opposite to what it was with Baker. So, what’s up with that is that they didn’t want Oswald arrested at the TSBD. They wanted to get him armed first and hoped that he’d die in a shootout with the police.

Then, there’s the claim that all the shots came from the 6^th floor window. You realize that Dealey Plaza descends. So, the limo was a lot lower than the 6^th floor when it was right below the window, but it was lower yet after going down the hill. But, Humes said that the fatal head shot entered at the bottom of his skull, slightly above and to the right of the external occipital protuberance, and came out the top of his head. But, that’s a movement from down to up. But, how could it do that if it came from way up? Did the bullet ricochet off something? They never said that, and there is nothing it could have ricocheted off.

And what about the discrepancy between what the Parkland doctors said and what the autopsy doctors said? Those Parkland doctors all said that JFK had a big blowout wound at the bottom-right of his head, and they demonstrated it by putting their fist back there.  But, then, hours later, the back of JFK’s head was intact? Who are you going to believe? I believe the Parkland doctors, and so does everyone with sense.

Then, there is the preposterous odyssey of that efffin’ rifle, supposedly having been taken to New Orleans by Oswald, despite Ruth Paine and Marina not seeing it when they took him to the bus station. Then, the story went that Oswald, knowing that Ruth Paine was a gun-hating pacifist, snuck his rifle into her station wagon and just hoped that it would wind up in her garage. Then, we’re supposed to believe that Michael Paine, that generous guy who was in a divorce battle with his soon-to-be ex-wife, but cheerfully went along with supporting a pregnant Russian woman and her daughter because the more the merrier. He empties the station wagon, and although he was curious as hell about what was in that bundled blanket- was it camping equipment? Tent poles? A military shovel? Every time he moved it, from one place to another, in that crowded garage, he conjured up another story for it. But, he never peeked into it because that would have been violating the Oswalds’ privacy. You buying that shit, are you? And by the way, Oswald said he never ordered any rifle, and John Armstrong proved that the whole “mail-order from Chicago” story was bull shit.

https://harveyandlee.net/Guns/Guns.html

So you realize what that means? It means that from the very beginning, the FBI was framing Oswald. And they were surely smart enough to know that it would never hold up in court. So, what does that tell you? It tells that they knew, from the start, that they had to kill Oswald, that he was a dead man walking. And they didn’t just get lucky that Jack Ruby came along and did it. Luck had nothing to do with it.  They killed Oswald, and the hapless, hopeless, helpless Jack Ruby was just a poor feeble soul whom they tricked into believing that he did it. It really pisses me off that they took advantage of a mentally handicapped person. At least Oswald had his wits about him and had two days to defend himself, and he did. He declared his innocence 13x on tape that I know of. And at the Midnight Press Conference, he was the most cogent and intelligent person in the room. He made such a good impression, they had to put a racket of noise over him. And I don’t mean that that noise was there at the Midnight Press Conference. I mean that they added it to the tape afterwards, including the voice of a firing squad commander yelling, “At ease!”

You realize that the story goes that Oswald hid his bag with the disassembled rifle somewhere, and who knows where, and then had to retrieve it and assemble it, and that he used a dime as a screwdriver to do it. So, supposedly Oswald had to find the bag, put the rifle together with the coin, assemble the Sniper’s Nest, figure out how he would go about the shooting, and come up with a plan for his escape, and he had to do all that between 12 and 12:25. Yet, he actually took the time to eat lunch first. Well, a man has to eat. And speaking of eating, did I mention that Bobby Ray Williams ate his lunch on the 6^th floor? It was some fried chicken and a Dr. Pepper. We have a photograph of the empty bottle.   

The murderous, genocidal State killed Kennedy and framed Oswald and Ruby. The difference between them was that Oswald was smart and Ruby was stupid, a bumbling, stumbling, drug-laced fool.

That Oswald killed Kennedy is just a State fiat.  It is just Hail to the Almighty State, the same State that just carried out this monstrous war that killed 168 schoolgirls the first day. Oh, the wickedness of it all… Heaven help us.