Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 We have a lot of new people here, and I am going to give them the short course on why Jack Ruby was, absolutely and positively, innocent. He did NOT shoot Oswald.

Now, I know what you're thinking: millions saw him do it on television. No! Millions saw a short, pudgy, middle-aged white guy wearing a fedora hat do it on teleivision. Millions didn't recognize him as Ruby. There were men in that garage who knew Ruby well, sucvh as Hugh Aynesworth, who didn't recognize the shooter as Ruby. So, how could people at home do it? They came to believe he was Ruby not from seeing it but from the Police annoucning it was him. So, it doesn't matter if even a billion saw it on television. It means nothing.

And your next thought is probably : But, Ruby admitted that he did it. Wrong again. Ruby accepted that he did it. Big difference. Ruby said that he never had the slightest thought, the whole weekend, of hurting Oswald. Never once did it cross his mind. So, he had no thought to shoot him, and no memory of doing it either. Ruby said that all he could remember was going to the garage and being jumped by the police, after having done nothing. And he started wailing: "What are you doing? You know me. I'm Jack Ruby. I'm not some criminal." Now, the Garage Shooter never said a word, and we have the films to prove it. And the reporters in the garage even said that the Shooter never spoke. So, Ruby was there beforehand, and that's when he had his scuffle with the Police.

But, they waited until they got him up to the 5th floor before telling him that he shot Oswald. That was the ONLY basis that he accepted that he did it. It wasn't from anythng else. And if he were normal, which he wasn't, he wouldn't have accepted it. If he were normal, he would have said, "Are you out of your mind? I was standing there, minding my own business, when you jumped me and dragged me up there. And now you're telling me I shot Oswald? Well, you picked the wrong guy to mess with. I want a lawyer. I want him now. And if you moe-foes think you're going to get away with this, you gotta another thing coming. You want a war with me? You got it." So, that's what he would have said if he were mentallly sound, but he wasn't mentally sound. And that's why they picked him to do this to because they knew he wasn't mentally sound.

But, where does that leave us today, trying to figure out what happened in 1963 in 2026? Well, one thing is for sure: we have to start by comparing images of the Shooter to images of Ruby. And yes, I know they're blurry, blah, blah, blah. But, they're all we have, and we have to make the best of it. And, the fact is: they do contain information, and I mean data.

And fortunately, we can compare images of Ruby on that day to the Shooter on that day. And when we do that, we can see that they are different men. I could get elementary school children to see that these are not the same man. The man on the left had a very short neck, and his neck in back was razored clean of hair. Ruby , on the right, looks scruffy in back, like he was a few weeks out since his last haircut. But, otherwise, he has the normal tapering in back. The Shooter, on the left, is wearing a wig. You don't see any hairs growing out of his head. That is a rug.

Now, if you can't see, and if you can't admit, that those are different men, then you need to get out of here. You need to hang out with other JFK people. Do yourself and me a favor and just leave if you can't see it. I don't want to waste my time on you, and you shouldn't want to waste your time on me. This group is an Oswald-innocent and Ruby-innocent group. If that ain't your space, then vete de aqui.