This group is growing leaps and bounds, and I thank all the people who have been supporting me. But, I have also been banning people left and right because I'm not going to debate the JFK assassination with people who support the official story. If that's your spin, just go away. There are plenty of other JFK groups you can join, but you are not welcome here.
Now, I am going to talk about the Dave Wiegman film, which is the one that Congresswoman Luna has been talking about to the Media. Dave Wiegman worked for NBC, and he was in the first camera car, which was 6 vehicles behind the Presidential limo.
The first camera car was a 1964 Chevrolet Impala convertible. So, in November 1963, they had the latest model Chevy Impala., the 1964. It was provided by a Dallas Chevy dealer, Earl Hayes Chevrolet.
We know that he shot 16 mm film that was 24 frames per second, but we don't know the make and model of his camera.
But, I'll point out that there was nothing wrong with cameras then. They didn't shoot blurry footage. They had great film cameras in 1939, which was the year that The Wizard of Oz and Gone with the Wind came out. The Dave Wiegman film is EXTREMELY blurry, and it was deliberately blurred; not while filming, but afterwards.
So, who blurred it? Our government did. I certainly don't think that NBC took it on themselves to blur it. And prior to the age of internet and Youtube, what means did people have to watch the Wiegman film? I honestly don't know.
Congresswoman Luna kept saying that NBC has the Dave Wiegman film that shows Oswald outside. But, the Dave Wiegman film is streaming on Youtube today. So, what's the difference? The difference, I presume, is that she thinks NBC has the Dave Wiegman film unblurred, which we don't have; not on Youtube or anywhere else.
The next thing is to watch at the Dave Wiegman film. There are several postings of it on Youtube. I suggest you watch this one because it is in slow-motion. However, it was put up by the Prayermanites, and I want you to know that I denounce them vociferously because they insist that Oswald WAS in the doorway but not as the Altgens Doorman or even the Wiegman Doorman. Rather, they point to a fictitious figure whom they call Prayer Man, and they say Oswald was him. I tell you that Prayer Man is fictitious, that he was nobody.
The Prayermanites are propagandists. They are noise-makers. Their mission is to make noise to distract from the fact that Oswald was the Altgens Doorman by making a preposterous counter-claim that he was somebody else who wasn't anybody. So, I denounce the Evil Prayermanites, and I ask you to shun them. However, this slow-motion video of the Dave Wiegman film, which they put up, is useful, which is why I am using it.
So, watch this extremely blurry clip from the Dave Wiegman film. What I want you to notice is that Wiegman captured the doorway when his press made the turn from Houston to Elm. At the time, Wiegman was not trying to capture the doorway. He wasn't even thinking about it. He was just riding in the car and capturing the view; whatever was in front of him.
So, his car completed the 120 degree turn from Houston to Elm and then continued down Elm. Then, Wiegman did something very signifcaint: With his camera, he swung around to his right to do a second pan of the doorway. The first pan was just incidental, but the second pan was deliberate. He made the conscious, focused decision to film that doorway a second time.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v7Q88vpIsp4
I'm going to quit now because I want to go about this very slowly. But, I leave you with a question: Why did Wiegman shoot the doorway a second time? The answer is that he must have seen something through the corner of his eye, or heard something, or both, that propelled him to do it. And we'll talk about that next time.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.