The Bagman bags, and he is covering up the head of James W. Bookhout, impersonating Jack Ruby. 

 

 The biggest question about Kennedy is: what caused his muscles to seize up and his mind to completely collapse? It was the most sudden, rapid, and severe deterioration of a person, both physically and mentally, that ever occurred. The only trauma he received to that point was a shallow, inconsequential wound in his back, and a shallow wound in his throat that damaged his trachea but was limited to that. He suffered no physical damage to his brain or nervous system to that point. Yet, he was rendered a neuromuscular wreck and imbecilic, and beyond imbecilic. He was completely withdrawn, unresponsive, with a complete absence of cognition, and the inability to communicate. Kennedy's bizarre physical and mental state is the elephant in the room that everyone has ignored. 

The most valuable thing about the Zapruder film is what it shows us about JFK's condition after he was shot, and his condition was appalling. Mentally, he was gone. He had no ability to talk or to communicate in any way. He had no awareness or understanding of what was happening to him. Obviously, if he did, he would have ducked and gotten his wife to duck. But, he did nothing. And physically, he entered a state of spastic paralysis in which he lost control of his muscles. He had no control over them at all as his spastic paralysis spread. 

What could have caused this? Let's consider his trauma. I won't waste a second discussing the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory. JFK's trauma was that he had a shallow wound in his back that affected no vital tissue. It was just a small puncture wound in the muscle and fascia. For all practical purposes, it did no harm to him at all. It was like a scratch.

Then, he had a shallow wound to his throat that did damage his trachea. It was serious but definitely recoverable. He would have needed surgery, but I suspect he would have been back on the job, to some extent, in a matter of days; less than a week. 

Neither trauma could have caused any mental derangement. And neither trauma could have caused him the neuromuscular degeneracy that we see in the Zapruder film. 

So, the physical trauma that Kennedy had received could not have caused the extreme degeneracy, both physical and mental, that we see on him in the Zapruder film. 

So, what could have caused such extreme derangement of his mind and his body and so suddenly? It had to be poisoning.  There is nothing else that could have done it. JFK was hit in the back with a poisoned ice flechette high on the hill. That is the truth, and it is not in doubt.

 At this link, you can watch and hear LBJ praising Rufus Youngblood for saving his life.

https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/video/president-johnson-honors-secret-service-agent-stock-video-footage/1177653289

He was referring to the claim that RY reached behind and grabbed LBJ and shoved him down to the floor of the backseat of the convertible. Then, supposedly, he climbed over his seat and lied on top of LBJ, using his body to shield LBJ's. It never happened.

Here is Senator Yarborough's detailed affadavit, in which he correctly pointed out that the interval between the 1st and 2nd shots was much longer than the interval between the 2nd and 3rd shots. That's because the 1st shot was the shot to JFK's back, which contained a nerve agent that hit him high on the hill.

https://history-matters.com/archive/jfk/wc/wcvols/wh7/pdf/WH7_Yarborough_aff.pdf

All this fabricating about LBJ and Youngblood was caused by the removal of LBJ from the Altgens photo, which was done because he was hunkered down so low, obviously concerned about being hit.

It was physically impossible for LBJ and Youngblood to be stacked on the floor of the convertible. There wasn't room for them. The feet and legs of Yarborough and Lady Bird occupied that space. It never happened. LBJ was such a liar.

 A minor debacle developed over LBJ in the Altgens photo. He can't be seen in it. And since he can't be seen in it, the story became that he got down on the floor of the convertible. Actually, he was blackened out because he was scooting down, making sure his head was lower than the back of the seat, to make sure he wasn't hit by a stray bullet. And since that would have looked bad, they took him out of the photo.

However, they couldn't admit that they tampered with the photo, so the story became that he was sprawled down on the floor of the car. And since that idea was just as bad, or even worse than what happened, the story became that it wasn't his doing, that Rufus Youngblood, his Secret Service agent, grabbed him and thrust him down and then got on top of him.

It's funny if you think about it: these two big men sprawled on the floor of the car, one on top of the other, right over the feet of Lady Bird and Senator Youngblood.

But, rest assured that that did not happen. However, that didn't stop LBJ from holding a ceremony to honor Youngblood for his brave, selfless action in the line of duty. They did it at the White House, with all the pomp and circumstance. Even Youngblood's wife and kids were there to celebrate his greatness, although all an effinn' lie.

I suspect that the Altgens photo is the most altered photo in the history of photography. It's amazing what Brugioni's team got done in just 5 hours. That's how much time they had: from 12:30 to 5:30 Central when Walter Cronkite showed it on national television for the first time.

I am reminded of the old adage: Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we venture to deceive.

I know it’s hard for people to accept that the Dallas Police killed Oswald and framed the hapless, hopeless Jack Ruby.  Even Ruby’s lawyers didn’t figure it out, or get close to figuring it out, even though they were given hints. They had Ruby telling them that he had no thought of shooting Oswald-ever; and neither did he have any memory of doing it. His whole basis for accepting that he did it was the Dallas Police telling him that he did.

Then, they had another big clue. It was the fact that the photos showed that the Shooter used his middle finger to pull the trigger. Why would Jack Ruby do that? His lawyers asked him why he did it, and his response was that since he had no thought or memory of doing it, he had no idea why he used his middle finger.

Handguns are designed to fit your hand using the index finger as the trigger finger. Even little kids, when they’re playing cops and robbers, get it that they pretend-shoot their toy guns using their index finger on the trigger.  The fact was that Ruby’s left index finger was partially amputated. It is extremely likely, bordering on certain, that the people who staged this had the wrong information. They, apparently, believed that Ruby’s right index finger was the one amputated. Hence, they had James Bookhout use his middle finger.

There are several other facts that should help you get over the mental illness that I call “Americana” which is the belief that police committing cold-blooded murder doesn’t happen in America because this is America.

1 Ruby could not have had any intention of shooting Oswald because if he did, he would have showed up on time, that time being 10 AM. And Ruby said that not only did he have no intention of shooting Oswald, but he had no intention of even seeing him. So, all that leaves is that it was, for Ruby, a sudden impulse. But if so, why didn’t he remember it? How could it possibly have happened without him knowing it and recalling it?

2 The Dallas Police lied. Jim Leavelle lied through his teeth. He said that he recognized Ruby in the garage and saw him closing in. He said that he tried to jerk Oswald behind him to protect him. He made no such jerk. It was a complete lie. And then he said that he thumped Ruby on his left shoulder with the heel of his right hand. He did not. That was another complete lie. Then, when he was asked on 11/24 who helped him carry Oswald into the Jail Office, he stammered and hesitated and then said that he couldn’t remember. Now, that is ridiculous, and surely you agree. The reason he didn’t want to cite anyone is because it was no one. No one helped him carry Oswald into the Jail Office because he didn’t carry Oswald into the Jail Office. Oswald got up and went in on his power. And since Leavelle was handcuffed to Oswald, how could he lift him? Since his left wrist was tied to Oswald’s right wrist, it meant that anywhere Leavelle’s left wrist went, Oswald’s right wrist had to go. So, how could Leavelle get his hands underneath Oswald to pick him up when he was handcuffed to him?

And if anyone wants to do an experiment in which they handcuff themselves to someone and then try to pick them up and carry them, be my guest.

But, let’s go on with the police lies. All the detectives said that Oswald remained unconscious the whole time in the Jail Office. That is all except one. Detective Combest, alone, said that Oswald was conscious, that he opened his eyes, and he was responsive. Combest said that, in trying to get a confession from Oswald, he asked him if he had a statement to make-before it was too late. And Combest said that Oswald shoot his head “no.” Now, if that were true, don’t you think that other detectives would have seen it? Combest was also asked who carried Oswald into the Jail Office, and he said it was him, Leavelle, and Graves. Graves? Graves went with Bookhout. He was one of the Penguins who was hustling Bookhout through the corner door and keeping him covered up. And Graves himself said so. He said that he didn’t see Oswald again until he was lying on the floor in the Jail Office, and that he did NOT help carry him in.  And he said that Oswald was completely unresponsive.

Another liar was Detective Elmer Boyd. He claimed that he watched the Oswald shooting on television when he was having Sunday brunch at his in-laws’ house. That was a lie. He was there. We have an image of him hovering with the Shooter on the 3^rd floor, and with him was his partner Richard Sims, and another detective whose name was Hall. I’m attaching that image. It was taken just minutes after the shooting. The man in the middle is supposed to be Jack Ruby, but he is obviously not Jack Ruby.

3 The lying cops were the only ones who claimed to recognize Ruby in the garage. None of the reporters or cameramen claimed it. One of the reporters was Hugh Aynesworth who knew Ruby very well. He had eaten lunch with Ruby that week. Even though he saw the shooter zipping by, he didn’t know he was Jack Ruby until the police announced it. He did NOT recognize Ruby in the garage.

Now, I’ll point out that, as the years passed, that some of the men who were there, in talking about it would say things like, “and then I saw Ruby come out.”  But, what they meant was that, “and then I saw the man, who I later learned was Jack Ruby, come out.”

 4. Consider the suit that Leavelle wore: an Easter suit. Yeah, he came dressed up as the Easter Bunny. Why? I believe it was to create color contrast between him and Oswald. They put Oswald in black and him in white, so to speak. That way, it would help guide the Shooter. And Leavelle wore that suit on Saturday too. So, on Friday. the President of the United States, and his very good friend JD Tippit got murdered, yet, on Saturday he decided to wear an Easter suit? And then again on Sunday?

5 Dallas Police claimed to get over 100 phone calls threatening to kill Oswald. There is even a photo of Leavelle and others manning the phones, like at a PBS fundraiser. Do you believe that people called in that way? If you intended to kill Oswald, for what reason would you inform the police? And the police said over and over, on the radio, that they feared the attack would come during the Jail Transfer. Then why do it? Why not transfer Oswald in the dead of night without telling the public anything? You could tell them afterwards. Why did they have to make a public spectacle out of it?

6 There are people who believe that the Dallas Police conspired WITH Jack Ruby to kill Oswald. But, nobody in his right mind would trust Jack Ruby to do that. We’re talking about shooting somebody in a very small, crowded space, loaded with police. In other words, Ruby would be shooting in their direction. Jack Ruby was a nitwit. He was a scatterbrain. He was a character. He was like Lou Costello. Nobody in his right mind would have trusted Jack Ruby to do a shooting.  He was a nincompoop, and they knew it.

The idea that they would get Jack Ruby to do it is ridiculous in the first place. But, in the second place, how could they trust him to keep his mouth shut? Remember, it was going to be followed by them arresting him, charging him, prosecuting him, testifying against him, in an effort to secure a death sentence so that they could electrocute him. What if Ruby woke up one morning and decided that he had enough of that and was going to spill the beans on them? Do you think they were going to go to bed every night knowing that Ruby could betray them to his lawyers at any time? A cooperative conspiracy between the Dallas Police and Jack Ruby is absurd.

7. Ruby claimed to speak during the melee. “What are you doing? You know me. I’m Jack Ruby. I’m not some criminal. I’m not wanted.” And the cops also said that he did. But, we have the films, and the Shooter spoke or tried to speak. And nobody in the garage, other than the cops, said that the Shooter spoke. The reporters said he never did, and he didn’t.

We’re talking about two separate events, separated by about an hour. The first was the taking of Jack Ruby. He got to the basement much earlier than reported. He told the Warren Commissioners that he sent his money wire at 10:15. Of course, he was corrected right away, and by a Secret Service agent who was in San Francisco on the day it happened.  But, Ruby really did send it at 10:15.

So, that is when they grabbed Ruby, and they hustled him upstairs. And after that, they placed Roy Vaughn at the Main Street ramp. He had no idea that he was being set up. Vaughn was adamant that Ruby did not get past him. And Vaughn was no slouch. He went on to become the Chief of Police of the city of Midlothian, Texas. And after that, he became a municipal judge for 13 years, until his death. Vaughn was right that Ruby did not get past him. The whole bit at that ramp was a magnet for Ruby. It was an incoming ramp. So, why were people gathered there? Who were they waiting to see arrive? Nobody. So, it made no sense for them to even  be there. But, the stumbling, bumbling, drug-wrecked Ruby got there early and no doubt was coaxed down the ramp. And with Ruby tucked away on the 5^th floor, they put on the spectacle in the basement, and it was for television.

Make no mistake: Oswald was killed that day. There is no chance that he was let go. But, he was shot afterwards, He was not shot in the garage. They needed a surgically precise shot, and that is what they got. I’ve got to hand it to them. They knew what they were doing about that. They were out to get Oswald to bleed, and he bled so much, internally, that Parkland doctors had to replace his entire blood volume. But, even that couldn’t save him.

How long have you believed that Oswald was innocent? Well, it’s time that you start believing that Ruby was innocent too.

 Here, Detective Miller puts something over Bookhout's head after his hat fell off. The Penguins pause a bit for him to do that.