Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Someone has offered to present my work on the Moorman photo to a prominent researcher, and I have written this as an introduction.

Thank you for considering this. I maintain that the Moorman photo was severely altered and that Mary Moorman did not take it. I brought in a physicist who specializes in optics. He has been invited to give lectures to physicists at physics conferences about optics. And he determined, scientifically and mathematically, that the Moorman photo was taken at an angle from behind, that the photographer let the limousine pass her, and then, being turned left, she took the photo from behind, on a diagonal line of sight, which caught the back of their heads. 

But, Mary Moorman has never claimed to have done that. In describing it and in demonstrating it, she has always shown that the Kennedys reached her, and she took their picture. Straight forward; simple as that. It did not involve her letting them pass her and then shooting them from behind. She was camera-ready from the moment they made the turn from Houston to Elm, so why would she do that? Why would she put off taking their picture? She wouldn't; she didn't; and she never said she did. 

If you look at the lower right corner of the Moorman photo, you see what is purported to be the right arm of Officer BJ Martin on his motorcycle. But, it's impossible. Mary Moorman was on the grass on the south side, so his left side was facing her as he passed her. So, how could her camera catch only his right arm? Her angle of view had to capture the left side of him before it could capture the right side of him. The left side of him may have obstructed her view of the right side of him, but not vice versa. For her to have captured just a part of his right arm and no other part of him was "physics-ly" impossible. 

So, that rendering of BJ Martin in the Moorman photo is fake. Where he really is in the picture is in front of Hargis. There are two men and two motorcycles there which the alterers converted into one. But, apparently, it looked so bad when they were done that they embellished it with that ridiculous thumbprint just to muck it up but good.

This is the money shot from the Muchmore film; the frame that closely matches the Moorman photo.

If you compare JFK and Jackie in this frame with JFK and Jackie in the Moorman photo, you will see that they match very well. But look at Martin and Hargis in this frame. Martin is on the outside and Hargis is on the inside. I'm saying that that photographic capture is very close to how they were captured in the Moorman photo. And it has to be because if JFK and Jackie are the same as they are in Moorman, then Hargis and Martin also have to be the same in Moorman.

That is how the Moorman photo must have originally looked: two motorcycles and two cops, which they reduced to one, with the aid of a thumbprint. What we are seeing here is someone's perspective, but it is not the perspective of Mary Moorman; it is the perspective of Babushka Lady.

From BL's angle, Martin got thrust forward in the picture. It's the parallax effect. The conspirators must have gotten that image from Babushka Lady, altered it, and then blown it up and taken a Polaroid of it, which they then claimed was Mary's. 

There must have been a reason why they had to replace Mary's picture. It must have shown something that they did not want to be revealed. 

Notice also the missing arm and compromised torso of Bill Newman in the Moorman photo on the far right. Notice the weird sketchy stuff behind Chaney. Why don't we see the back of his motorcycle where the tool box was? Why does his motorcycle look more like a riding lawnmower? That whole area of the Moorman photo was highly altered.

Also, JFK's head had to be altered since the photo was taken after the fatal head shot, but his head looks intact. Consider what Hargis said, that he was soaked with gore from Kennedy's brain which came flying his way, and think about the Harper fragment found on the grass. How could Kennedy's head have been intact at that moment? 

They did monstrous things to the Moorman photo, and worst of all, it's not even Mary Moorman's photo. It is Babushka Lady's. She is the only one who could have taken it. She is the only one who was at the right angle and position to take it. Mary Moorman was never turned like that. Mary was always facing Elm Street squarely, that is, perpendicularly, and that is true in every frame of every film in which we see her. Mary never turned.

Please read through these blogs of mine. I have devoted the last few weeks to this, practically non-stop. Mary Moorman did not take the Moorman photo. It was physically impossible for her to have done so. And, the science of Physics supports that conclusion.