Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is NOT the original of the Moorman photo. There is no original. There is no more an original Moorman photo than there is an original Altgens photo.

Think: The FBI came to Mary's house at 12:31 AM the night of the assassination to get her copy back. It's been widely admitted that they already duplicated it earlier that day. So, what did they need hers back for? It's because they were going to alter it, and they couldn't have her pristine copy floating around. 

And, it was Tom Wilson who determined that the Moorman photo was definitely altered to hide the big blowout wound in the back of Kennedy's head. And remember, it was definitely taken after the fatal head shot. So, how could it possibly be real? The so-called "original" shows the same intact head as the other. So, the idea that we still have the original Moorman photo is ridiculous. 

 Let's remember, this so-called "original" didn't come from Mary Moorman. Other people, people who defend the official story of the JFK assassination, are the ones who say this is the original. And where did they get it? Who knows? But, they are the same people who say that the Altgens photo went out at 1:03 PM.

I can prove it's been doctored by comparing it to the other one with the thumbprint. 

But first, note that the thumbprint is still there in the "original".

Can't you see it on the left? It's fainter, less obtrusive, but it's the exact same shape and in the exact same area as the other. 

Look at it as a whole with that in mind. The thumbprint is clearly visible in the exact same spot.

So, stop thinking that this is the original. There is no more a Moorman original than there is an Altgens original.

Now, let's look at Hargis' arm. Oh, they cleaned it up good and right; they just went a little wrong with the anatomy. 

 Look at the location of Hargis' arm on the left. Look how low it is. I put an x at the bottom of his arm. So, that means his armpit is under there. How could his armpit be that low? I also put a y where his hip bone is on the other side. How could that distance be so short? Look at the thickness of his arm:

In fact, when you look at his arm directly above, it doesn't even look it's joined to his torso. It's too thick; it's too low; it's not going to his shoulder properly. That is art and not very good art. 

I'll point out that the mind wants to make sense of images. And, it actually fills in the blanks and takes an understanding from your memory to make sense of images. And in this case, your mind wants to see it as a guy riding a motorcycle. But look behind him at the back of the motorcycle. And then look at the front of the motorcycle where the wheel is. THE BACK AND THE FRONT OF THE MOTORCYCLE ARE NOT CONNECTED.

Now, I'll draw a line from him to the back of his bike, and a line from the front of the bike back a ways. 

It's two bikes and two bike riders. They just took one of them out. So, how can this be the original when it includes the excision of BJ Martin? 

Would you agree that Hargis and Martin were riding parallel to each other? They had to, right? To avoid running into each other? 

Well, supposedly, there is a second back for which there is a very prominent and thick windshield right next to Hargis. Do you see it? That windshield stands out much more than Hargis' and Chaney's doesn't stand out at all. And supposedly, there is Martin's claw-like hand on the handlebar grip on the bottom right. Do you see it? So that gives us a sense about the plane of that bike, even if it is imaginary. So, let's draw it in.

Isn't there going to be a collision there? Hargis looks to be parallel to the photographer, but that extra bike is careening right into him. It's bogus! It's just made up bull shit. This is NOT the original. This is the just the smudged photo that has been photoshopped. The original of the Moorman photo has as much chance of being found as the body of Jimmy Hoffa.