Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Anthony Marsh, who in my opinion is just another dis-info Op, maintains that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy but did kill Tippit. 

His rationale for this ridiculous position is that Oswald feared Tippit was going to arrest him for the Walker shooting- like that was foremost on Tippit's mind 15 minutes after Kennedy died. 

But, nobody got hurt in the Walker shooting. And, it happened 8 months before. There were no witnesses to the shooting. A neighbor claimed to see two men rushing off in cars, separate cars, neither of whom he described as looking like Oswald. Plus, Oswald had no car nor did he drive. There was no proof whatsoever that Oswald did it or that he was even there at the time or that his rifle or his bullet were used. There was no way a conviction against Oswald was possible, and it's doubtful they had enough to even charge him. 

In fact, the whole case against Oswald was built on one thing and one thing only: Marina Oswald: her willingness to support the ridiculous story and tell the Warren Commission what they wanted to hear. 

But guess what? Marina would not have had to testify in criminal court. That's because there's a provision called "spousal privilege" in which a wife does not have to testify against her husband.

You take Marina out of the equation, and the whole case against Oswald falls completely to nothing; it vanishes.   

Then, there was the phony Walker note. Do you know who produced it? Ruth Paine. Need I say more? The note was undated, and did not mention General Walker or any reason why Oswald might find himself under arrest. There is absolutely nothing incriminating about it. 

I'm certain the principle of "reasonable doubt" was the rule of law in 1963. In this case, there was NO CHANCE that Oswald could be convicted for the shooting attempt of Walker. 

But, even if there were a chance- and there wasn't- one would have to be completely and totally insane to compound a pot-shot which hurt no one into the cold blooded murder of a police officer. Oswald was NOT insane. It's the idea that is insane, and, it's the person holding it. 

But, maybe not. Maybe the person holding the insane idea is really working for the other side, doing a little diversion, a little distraction, a little disorientation. And, it does make a mockery and a laughing stock of the whole idea of conspiracy, does it not? 

But, one thing is for sure: this idea of Anthony Marsh that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy but did kill Tippit is THE zaniest, the wackiest, and the most downright comical idea in all of JFK assassination research. And, it's not surprising that not a single other person in the whole "community" has endorsed it.    

Marsh, you are the kookiest, marshiest clown to ever pretend to be a JFK researcher. It doesn't get any worse than you.