Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Frank Foster:

Mr. Cinque, to clarify my theory of the Jack Ruby obfuscation in the film in the Dallas PD garage just prior to the shooting of LHO, it is clear to me the video of the Oswald assassination was aided by the news agency that took the film coverage and altered the footage by superimposing a left side frontal view "still shot photo" onto the left side profile of the person believed to be Jack Ruby seen within the film. Perhaps, the  left side of the  frontal view Still shot Photo  may be an already existing frontal view of the real jack ruby and inserted onto the film negative and pasted onto the left side profile on the face of the individual believed to be Jack Ruby. I am certain this is the case in order to fool the public.

 

Ralph Cinque:

Frank, you are on the right track, but it's worse than that. First, Ruby wasn't in the garage at all. He was already tucked away up on the 5th floor. He got there early; they jumped him and took him up there and told him that he shot Oswald. So, the guy you are talking about is not Jack Ruby. But, you are absolutely right that THAT IS NOT A REAL FACE. And I am telling you that as a doctor because he isn't even anatomically correct. Look at the distance between his side-burn and his ear. Nobody is built like that. Nobody has such a gap. So, that is a totally corrupted image. And look at those black discs over his eyes, which were part of the obfuscation. The story goes that that is shadow. But, that's ridiculous too because there is nothing that could cast such a shadow. Many people have taken it be dark sunglasses, but they couldn't go with that because Ruby had no sunglasses on him. And in addition, that man that you're talking about is NOT the man who rushed and shot, that is, fake-shot, Oswald.  That was someone else, a short man by the name of James Bookhout, an FBI agent. The whole thing, when you unravel it, is a terribly disgusting affair. Thank you.  Ralph Cinque