Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

 

Ed Brotherton

Ralph Cinque I'm ex Air Force Security Police trained in anti-terrorism and anti-hijacking. I was also a member of our 60th Security Police Emergency Services Team.

It's very easy armchair quarterback a situation that you've had 20 years to think about. A convenience that the passengers on that tragic day didn't have.

The hijackers didn't ask the pilots to give them the controls. They murdered the pilots the moment they entered the cockpit leaving the pilots with no choice but to try and defend themselves instead of notifying anyone of a hijacking or changing the transponder to 7500 indicating hijacking.

Furthermore we know that the some of hijackers informed the passengers there was a bomb on board. This would have caused anyone who was thinking of taking on the hijackers physically to think twice since there is a chance of detonating the bomb. This is why the passengers didn't get all Die Hard on them.

It wasn't until flight 93 when the passengers discovered that other planes had crashed into the WTC that they decided to fight back.

There are literally thousand and thousands of data points to 9/11 and for you to say "it's all a lie" is lazy and a convenience that way you can just throw it all out and proclaim you figured it all out when in fact you don't shit.

I gave you the insight of two Air Force Veterans and you dismiss what we say. You clearly have no clue what you're talking about and you should be ashamed of yourself for putting out utter nonsense.

Ralph Cinque: Ed Brotherton You have no right to assume as fact that the pilots were killed- even though it's part of the official narrative. If it were true, Todd Beamer and the others surely would have "rolled" sooner, and I mean immediately- as soon as it started going down that the pilots were being attacked. And nothing the hijackers "announced" would have deterred them. Why would they believe anything the hijackers said? If hijackers were attacking the pilots on a plane that you were on, wouldn't you get up and fight? How could you not? And in this case, the pilots were bigger men, plus Todd and his chums were big men. Those hijackers would not have had a chance, despite their "boxcutters." The airline industry did its own security prior to 9/11, and they already prohibited bringing boxcutters on planes. So, the scanners would have picked them up and stopped it. EVERYTHING that is claimed about United 93 is a lie. It did not crash at that site in Pennsylvania. It was blown up. Debris from the plane was found 8 miles away. If the plane was intact until the second it hit the ground, how could that happen? And no debris was found at the crash site: just some skidmarks, scorched earth, and a hole in the ground. That is not a crash site. No jetliner crashed there. The black box from UA93 was found, but it's contents were never revealed to the public. The whole claim of cell phone calls from 33,000 feet in 2001 is highly suspect. We shouldn't believe anything about the official story of UA93 or any of the other 9/11 flights. Hani Hanjour did not do a 270 degree corkscrew turn and slam AA77 into the Pentagon. There was very little plane wreckage there either. The whole 9/11 story is a lie. It's not just that it was an inside job; everything about it is a lie.