Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The only thing good about Ed Brotherton is that he gets me to write more about 9/11. I consider him an Op, a troll, and he is like a cyclops because the fact is: you can't say that 9/11 was an inside job, as he supposedly does, but then support all the particulars of the official narrative, which he definitely does.

Imagine you are at the Project for a New American Century meeting where they decide that they're going to have a "new Pearl Harbor" in order to get the wars they wanted. So, they come up with 9/11. And they come up with the whole story about the Arab hijackers, and the boxcutters, etc. Why would they actually do it that way, especially when they didn't have to? That way was risky; extremely risky. It could easily backfire. It could easily go wrong. You couldn't just assume that 4 hijackers would be successful at overcoming 40 people on a plane and just because they had boxcutters. THAT'S A STORY THAT YOU TELL, NOT A STORY THAT YOU DO. They had the resources of the whole U.S. government and military at their disposal, and the cooperation of a compliant media. They didn't have to chance actually trying to take over planes. There is no reason to think that they did that. And it would be awfully stupid to think that it was a sure thing that couldn't go wrong.

Note first that even in 2001, it was mandatory to keep cockpit doors closed and locked. And it was for good reason because there were already cockpit incursions before 9/11 and plenty of them.

In August 2000, a man burst into the cockpit of a Southwest flight from Las Vegas to Salt Lake City. Passengers jumped to their feet and went after the guy, and they BEAT HIM TO DEATH. You hear that, Brotherton? They beat him to death.

In March 2000, a man burst into the cockpit of a Spanish flight, but the pilots and crew quickly overcame him.

Also in March 2000, a man burst into the cockpit of an Alaska Airlines flight out of Puerto Vallarta, and the pilots, with help from passengers, overcame him quickly.

In December 1999, a man with an 8 inch knife burst into the cockpit of a Japanese flight. He did manage to stab the pilot in the neck, but the co-pilot and another pilot who was a passenger overcame him. Did I mention that he had an 8 inch knife?

In December 1999, a guy bursts into the cockpit of a British Airlines flight from London to Nairobi and struggled with the pilots. The plane did plunge 1000 feet during the struggle, but they overcame him.

Here is a picture of the crash scene at Shaksville.

Now, anyone who defends the idea that a real 757 crashed there is not a real 9/11 truther; he is a dis-info Op. That's what the CIA does. They get ordinary-seeming people to infiltrate groups like this and then spread their dis-info. I've seen it countless times. They do it a lot in the JFK realm as well.

Bottom line is that you can't marry the inside job story with the official narrative. They don't go together like peas and carrots. They don't go together at all. Yes, 9/11 was an inside job, and therefore, the entire official 9/11 narrative is a crock of shit.