There are twin pedestals at the end of the reflecting pool. Do you believe that 11 year old Toni Glover and her mother were standing on the one on the right? 

Do you think they're standing on that pedestal here? 

I've stood on the pedestal, and it's high. You feel tense on it. You can see how tense Toni felt. She was not going to galavant. 

She is looking down at the ground because the ground is her bearing. She doesn't want to fall. And notice how she towers over the young man on the sidewalk. Young Toni and her mother were not towering over anybody.

So, that's facing Houston Street, and I believe they are standing on the grass. But then, this is how they were a few seconds later.

Again, you see how high they were. So now, Toni is gripping her mother tightly, and she can't see anything except her mother's back. It seems like it should be jsut the opposite, with Toni in front and Mother behind and holding on to her to secure her. Notice that her hair is in a pony tail, but it's not in a pony tail in Dorman.

The image on the right came first. Look at the difference in affect. Why would she go from boisterous on the right to subdued and clingy on the left? It was just seconds apart. And look closely at her legs on the left. Look how weird they look. And look how much lower her right shoulder is than her left. That is a huge difference. The image on the right I believe is real; the image on the left is false. 

But, they needed it because of the Hughes film.

Suddenly, Toni has got shoulders like a linebacker. And she is covering up the exact spot where Oswald was. Who is that hovering over Carl Jones on our left? He is nobody. He wasn't there. That's art. Doorman (Oswald) was standing in the center of the doorway. He is being occluded by Toni. You can see him in the Wiegman film. They blurred it like hell, but Doorman is clasping his hands in front, just as Oswald habitually did. He was in the center of the doorway. 

The arrogance and hubris of the men who killed JFK was astounding. I mean the brazenness of it. It was so risky to do what they did. It could have gone terribly wrong for them, and it did go wrong in some ways. 

The worst thing that happened was Oswald stepping outside and being captured in images. It wasn't just the Altgens photo. You see him at the beginning of the Wiegman film, and they dealt with that by not just blurring the image but distoring it. In the Towner film, they dealt with it by blackening the doorway. In the Hughes film, they used the girl on the platform and the street signs to hide Oswald. There are others. And it resulted in decades of cover-up, involving false testimonies, phony film clips of Lovelady, and more. It really was a debacle for them. 

The shooting itself didn't go well. They hit Connally, and they didn't intend to. James Tague got grazed by a shot that must have been taken from a low elevation in the Dal-Tex building that missed and traveled down the length of Dealey Plaza. It forced them to attribute one of the three shell casings to it, hence forcing them to adopt the ridiculous Single Bullet Theory.  And it took much more firing than expected to kill Kennedy. It should have been done with one shot.

But, as bad as it went for them, it could have gone worse. If they could hit Connally by mistake, they could have hit Jackie. And that would have been a disaster for them because they needed her standing next to LBJ at the swearing-in ceremony to sanctify the whole thing. 

I'll add that it was despicable of them to subject Jackie to that risk. They could have killed him at an event that didn't include her.  The same goes for Mrs. Connally. 

Then, there was the bad luck of Zapruder taking his film. The original Zapruder film had to be very damning to the Official Story. The Z-film of today is a Frankenstinian monstrosity. The original film had to show that Kennedy was shot in the back high on the hill and rode down the hill manifesting the effects of that one shot. They changed it making it that he was smiling and waving until he passed behind the sign where everything happened except the fatal head shot. It's a complete fabrication. 

There can be no doubt that the Zapruder film is the most manipulated film in the history of filmmaking, and I'm a filmmaker. 

Another thing that went wrong was Mary Moorman capturing her photo. It must have been a doozey, and in the end, they desperately replaced it without another one taken by someone else (Babushka Lady) from a completely different angle (diagonally from behind) and had to put a white thumbprint over it to make it work. Talk about arrogance and hubris. 

So, a lot went wrong, but it could have gone even worse. The men who did this were brazen, very brazen. Even the word "reckless" applies. Where did the brazenness come from? It came from the "group-think"; from the strength in numbers. Like the generals sitting around talking about the operation in Afghanistan, lifting each other up. Consensus does that to people.  If Jim, Joe, and Johnny believe in it, it's got to be good. 

So, Afghan parents were giving their babies away to Marines? 

What, did they have a baby nursery at Kabul Airport? Did they have wet nurses or at least formula? And they had diapers and wipes and baby powder and everything else needed? And you should never lift a baby that way by one arm because you can dislocate the shoulder.  
 

Dr. Mike Hansen invited a friend of his, his best friend, who is also a physician, Dr. Hisbay Ali, on his program. Dr. Ali is a psychiatrist, and he got Covid last March, a mild case of it. He recovered without any lingering effects. Then he got both doses of the Moderna vaccine.  And then he got Covid again and much worse, and that's what they discussed. They assumed to know it was the Delta variant that he got, but that was just them being parrots.  

Dr. Ali emphasized that he is normally a very healthy guy, a runner, but this really knocked him out. It was the first time in his life he ever had a lung issue. (he looks to be in his late 30s)  He said he knew how he got it, that he was out in Las Vegas attending a Led Zeppelin tribute concert, which was packed solid, like sardines in a can, and no one was wearing masks, so he thinks he got a heavy viral load.  But wait: he knew that beforehand, didn’t he? We assume that a large crowd of unmasked people, whether they are bikers or partiers, means a heavy viral load, right? So, why did he go to such an event? It's because he presumed that the vaccine that he took had him covered. 

But, he got really sick and was down for 14 days. And it was bad. He said it felt like someone threw acid in his lungs. He couldn’t breathe. He said that his oxygen level fell to 95%, which is not very low, but it’s a meaningful drop. And it affected him. He couldn’t walk up a flight of stairs, and previously, he could run 10 miles.

Dr. Hansen pointed out that since he had had Covid already and then got the vaccine that his antibodies should have been through the roof. But, what exactly is he thinking? Does he think that Dr. Ali had the antibodies, but they just didn’t work? Or does he think that despite getting Covid and the vaccine that his body just didn’t make the antibodies? 

Then Dr. Hansen said that some people would say that the vaccine didn’t work, but he said that its just the opposite, because without the vaccine, Dr. Ali probably would have been super-sick, needing hospitalization, and he could have died or developed long Covid. Wow. That is an amazing assumption. It is just a choice he is making to look at it that way. I say we put the medico-religion aside and try to think clearly. The man took the vaccine to avoid getting Covid. He even went to Las Vegas thinking he had nothing to worry about. Surely, he assumed that taking the vaccine would prevent him from getting sick. But, it didn’t. An honest appraisal of the facts would surely conclude that the vaccine didn’t work for him. But no, the two doctors are willing to assume that he probably would have gotten much sicker or died without the vaccine.

They have no way of knowing that. It is just an assumption, and the truth may be the exact opposite. But, there is no doubt that they are engaging in rationalization.

Rationalization is a psychological defense mechanism in which unpleasant results are explained in a seemingly rational manner but without any solid basis in fact. That is what they’re doing, and they don't stop. 

I presume Dr. Ali wasn’t around anyone who was visibly sick at the concert. So, he must have gotten it from an asymptomatic carrier or many, right?  But, why didn’t they get sick? Well, let’s find out if they were vaccinated because if they were vaccinated, we have to assume that the vaccine protected them. Then, why didn't it protect Dr. Ali? And if they weren’t vaccinated, then we have to say that that’s just the nature of Covid that some people get symptoms and others don’t. But, Dr. Ali is relatively young (30s); healthy (runs over 100 miles a month); plus, being a physician and an athlete, he is presumably cognizant of nutrition and other good health practices. So, why couldn’t he handle it as well as the partiers? Or, maybe we should assume that the person or persons who gave Covid to Dr. Ali also got sick themselves. But, that would just be a presumption too. We have no way of knowing that, and you can't just help yourself to whatever mental shit you want.  The bottom line is that they have a medical paradigm to defend, and they’ll defend it to their last breath because they believe in it like a God-damn religion.    

I can guarantee you that if Dr. Ali had gotten even sicker and came close to death, Dr. Hansen would be saying “If not for the vaccine, you would have died; there is no doubt about it.” The only thing that Dr. Hansen can’t rationalize is death itself. But wait; maybe he can. If a person takes the vaccine but still gets Covid and dies from it, will Dr. Hansen admit then that the vaccine failed? No! He is still going to have a retort. He’s going to say that that person was part of a group that had fewer deaths than a comparable group of unvaccinated people, therefore even with death, the vaccine was still a success.  

Dr. Hansen went on to say that none of the vaccinated Covid patients he’s seen in the hospital have died. But, that’s an admission that he’s seen quite a few vaccinated people hospitalized for Covid because if it was just one or two, it wouldn’t have any significance. The whole claim is based on the size of the number. So, of all the vast number of vaccinated, hospitalized Covid patients he’s seen, none have died, so far. But, we are not living in a bubble of Dr. Hansen’s world. Here is a report that says 1000 fully vaccinated Covid patients died in England.

https://news.yahoo.com/how-many-double-jabbed-people-are-dying-from-covid-151218361.html?fr=sycsrp_catchall

Here’s a report from last month about 7 fully vaccinated people who died from Covid in a two week period in Florida.

https://www.ibtimes.com/7-fully-vaccinated-people-die-covid-19-florida-within-2-weeks-3275594

And here’s a report out of Massachusetts where it’s running about 125 fully vaccinated people a week dying of Covid.

https://www.ibtimes.com/131-fully-vaccinated-people-have-died-covid-19-massachusetts-3280806

Then, Drs. Hansen and Ali had the nerve to bring up Israel, the most vaccinated country in the world, where the breakthrough cases have been so numerous, they’ve launched a booster program.

https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/30/israel-doubles-down-on-covid-booster-shots-as-breakthrough-cases-rise.html

Dr. Ali, in defending the vaccine, said that during his illness, there were times that he thought he was going to die, and that thought is more scary than getting the vaccine. BUT, HE DID GET THE VACCINE!

Then, he said that his girlfriend, whom he lives with, didn’t get it from him because she’s vaccinated. So, why did he get it? Because: he was infected by probably 100 infected people at that concert (a number he just pulled out of his ass).

Then, they reveled in the extended lifespans due to Modern Medicine.  But, whenever doctors go on strike, the death rate drops.

http://antidepressant-dangers-non-medical-alternative.eftisland.com/html/death_rate_plummets.html

There is a ton written on this, and the usual retort is to say that normally there are a lot of “elective” procedures done, which don’t happen during a doctor strike, and that’s why the death rate goes down during a strike. Is that supposed to be reassuring?

Finally, they settled on the term of “science” which they equate with Medicine. But, they are not the same. Science is the acquisition of knowledge about nature and the world through systematic observation and experimentation. It doesn’t mean that everyone who professes to be a scientist draws valid conclusions. There can easily be the trappings of science but still a lot of prejudice, bias, and indoctrination that undermines it. Why hasn’t Medicine done double-blind, placebo-controlled studies of the flu vaccine? I know the excuse they give for not doing it for childhood vaccines, which is that, that it would be unethical to deny any child the vaccines.  But, with the flu vaccine, they could limit it to adults, and many adults don't get the flu vaccine anyway. But, if you offered to pay them, they'd participate in the experiment. So, it could easily be done, and there are no children or ethical issues involved, yet, they still won’t do it. And this they call science.  Here’s the discussion by Drs. Hansen and Ali.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJxRRcQtFDA

The universities reopened in Afghanistan, and now there is a divider between men and women in the classrooms. Of course, this is being derided in the U.S. and Europe as a violation of women's rights. I don't know that it's any worse for the women than it is for the men though. And I am reminded of the saying about the glass being half full or half empty. Because: if the last time the Taliban was in charge females couldn't attend university at all, then I'd have to say that the glass is half full here.    

I'm not saying that I approve of this, but it's a a hundred million times better than being at war. And at the core, it's not based on misogyny. It's based on religion. They think that this is what Allah wants. Afghanistan is now a country in which government and religion are intertwined. It is a theocracy. And we don't like that. We think there should be separation of Church and State. And so do I.  But, before we criticize them too much, let's remember that they've got their religion, and we've got ours. Ours is predominantly Christianty. It's not officially the State religion, but you know very well that it has a powerful influence. It's no accident that Presidents like to be seen going to Church and totin' the Bible.

And don't forget George W. Bush who is a big religionist. 

That's amazing. The guy was running the country and leading the Free World, as they like to say, and he had time to get into the Bible every day? There are probably preachers who don't get into the Bible every day. And what effect did it have on him? It led him to wage war on two impoverished nations and end the lives of millions of innocent people, including men, women, and children.  And the truth is that at the time he launched the wars, most Church leaders in the U.S. supported him. I distinctly remember hearing a prominent Christian leader explaining on the radio why it was our moral duty to attack Iraq.  

So yes, it's pretty archaic and medievalist what's going on over there in Afghanistan, and it doesn't seem right for the 21st century.  When are these people going to let go of the past and stop being ruled by ancient dogmas?  When are we?  

 

This is a big find, a very big one. It proves that JFK was hit with something before he reached the freeway sign in the Zapruder film. 

First, look at frame 206. This was, supposedly, before he was hit. It was certainly before the alleged single bullet. He has his hand over his face, but why?

If he hasn't been hit yet, why is he doing that? And notice that Jackie, who was assigned to work the crowd on the other side, is turned and facing him. Why? Why is she looking at him? Something is wrong, very wrong, right here, and he hasn't even passed behind the sign yet. If he was already hit by the Single Bullet, then he'd be reacting to it. So, he's not reacting to that. Something else has happened. And note that Jackie said that when she turned and looked at her huband, that he had a "quizzical" look on his face. She didn't say that he had his hand over his face. I tell you that THIS IS WHEN SHE SAW THE QUIZZICAL LOOK. They put a phony hand there to hide the quizzical look. They used paint to create the hand. JFK was already shot in the back. 

Next, we have to jump to 225 because there's nothing to see in-between due to the sign. Of course, the sign was there, but they enlarged and re-angled it so that it would provide more cover. 

Notice that Jackie is still looking at him, and we have to assume that she looked at him throughout the interval. But, what about his hand? His hand is moving up. What does that tell you? It should tell you that it was lower than that in the frames before. When did he move it down from his face? NEVER. It was never on his face. That was paint. HE IS GOING UP WITH HIS HAND THERE and that speaks volumes.. He is in process bringing his hand up to his mouth. We know that from what follows. And that tells you that his hand must have been lower than that a second before. So, the very fact that he is in motion raising his right hand up tells you that it wasn't resting on his face a second before. If it was resting on his face a second bfore, he would have just lowered it to his mouth. This frame provides the affirmation that his hand was lower a second before, and it proves that the image of his hand over his face in the last 10 frames before he disappears behind the sign, starting at Z196 are bogus. THEY PAINTED THE HAND IN.  

Next, we'll go to Z230 where his hands are all the way up. He is coughing into his right hand and pulling on his tie with his left hand. 

Take a good look at that and then take a look at Z206 again. If his hand was over his face at Z206, then he just had to lower it a little to his mouth.

And, if you want to suggest that he lowered his hand all the way down and then brought it up again, you can't. That's impossible because there wasn't enough time. We have to conclude that his hand was down at 206, and they painted it on. The reason they did it was to hide the quizzical look that Jackie described.  

Next, we'll jump to 246 where, for no discernible reason, he is continuing to hold his arms up, like he's in spasm and can't release them. THAT IS EXACTLY WHAT IS GOING ON!

She has her hand on his arm because she is trying to coax him to put his arm down. He is acting like a freak there, and it is freaking her out. He has lost control of his muscles. He was hit in the back with a nerve agent that did that to him. 

And we know what it was because William Colby told us in 1975. It was paralytic shellfish toxin. Now read this: 

What are the symptoms of Paralytic Shellfish Poisoning?

Early symptoms include tingling of the lips and tongue. Symptoms may progress to tingling of fingers and toes and then loss of control of arms and legs. 

Loss of control of his arms- that is exactly what we are seeing on JFK.

By Z-256, Jackie has resorted to using two hands to try to lower his arm, but JFK is not yielding. 

At 269, JFK is as bound up as ever. But, he is leaning some towards Jackie. Her two hands are having some effect. They are not causing him to release his spasms, but he is rigidly leaning towards her in response to it.

Notice that he is even more hunched in his shoulders. So, it's not just his deltoids and biceps, but his trapezius muscles are all in spasm. And it was a chemical effect. He had suffered no upper motor neuron damage to this point. You can't claim that any of the physical trauma he received to this point was causing it. 

In Z295, he is completely frozen- physically and mentally. He is stone-like. Notice Jean Hill. She said that when the Kennedys reached her, she said, "Look this way, Mr. President. We want to take your picture." You think she said that here? The street and the farground were dissociated in the Zapruder film and reorganized. They had to move Jean Hill and Mary Moorman farther down the hill than they were. And that's because the "Moorman" photo was supposedly taken after he was shot, and I mean after the fatal head shot. Have you thought about that, that that's the story? Even though Mary said over and over that she took her picture simultaneous with the very first shot, they made it that she took it after the last shot. 

311 will be the last frame I'll show, just 2 frames before the fatal head shot. She is leaning in close to him. He is completley out of it: frozen in his body and mind. 

Jackie MUST have tried to talk to him. It would be crazy not to try to find out if he was capable of hearing, responding, and communicating. In her testimony all of this got brushed over. It has her saying that she looked at him and saw that he looked quizzical, and the next thing, she saw a piece of his head flying off. Obviously, there was quite a bit of time in-between those two things. So, it makes me wonder how much they cut out of her testimony. If they were smart, they would have removed the reference to the quizzical look. But, they left it in. They weren't thinking. They weren't that smart to begin with. 

I know it's difficult for people to accept that JFK was struck in the back with a nerve agent, but I wish they would remember that we have a picture of the gun, and we have the testimony of CIA Director William Colby talking about it, describing it, and saying how it was armed with shellfish toxin.

Just think: Gerald Ford, a JFK cover-up conspirator, was President. Colby was appointed by Nixon, who was also a JFK conspirator. But, after what Colby revealed at the Church hearings, Ford fired Colby and replaced him with George HW Bush, another JFK conspirator.  

 

Between what I have showed you and what we have known since 1975, no one has any reason to fight this or deny it except for Kennedy-killers. 

Have you noticed how many murders there have been lately? It's unbelievable. The guy in Florida who shot and killed a family of 4, all but the daughter, though shooting her 7 times; the couple in Long Beach who got shot on the street, both dying, as the woman's daughter watches. In Charlotte NC, there has been three homicides in the last 24 hours. A 17 year old in Wisconsin got sentenced to 20 years for killing his 7 year old cousin, torturing him. Also in Wisconsin, a grandfather used a sledgehammer, mallet, and coat rack to beat his 12 year old grandson to death. In Chicago, it was reported that there were 78 homicides in August. And I could keep going. It was just last Wednesday that another fatal school shooting occurred, this time in North Carolina. 

And with that murdering in mind, do you realize how insane it is for us to worry about terrorists in Afghanistan plotting to kill us? They're in Afghanistan. They're half-way around the world. The only way they could hurt us from there is if we go there. As long as we don't go there, they can't hurt us. All they can do from Afghanistan is flap their lips. And why worry about that when the murder of Americans by Americans is happening at a frightening pace? That family in Florida were just at home at their house, their cocoon of safety, sleeping in their beds in the wee hours of the morning, when that guy burst in and started shooting. He didn't even known them. 

Senator Lindsey Graham is the senior Senator from South Carolina. This year, 2021, South Carolina set an all time record for murders, up 25%. And, you know what they say; that it's hard to solve crimes in South Carolina because they all have the same DNA, and they have no dental records. 

 https://www.wltx.com/article/news/crime/murders-assaults-increased-south-carolina-sled/101-d9292dcf-a546-4184-b4e6-22e0eb1cdf7f  

Just the other day, the Idiot Graham said that we'll have to send troops back to Afghanistan to resolve the terror threat there to keep Americans safe. Americans aren't safe. They aren't safe here, from each other. To address the dangers that Americans face by sending troops back to Afghanistan would be maniacal. He is out of his mind. But, it's no wonder he got elected and relected in South Carolina. 

Even if you believe the cockamamie 9/11 story that Fatty, I mean, Osama bin laden sent jihadists here to go to dinky airport flight schools to learn how to fly Cessnas, and from that, they were doing 270 degrees corkscrew turns while rapidly descending in a 757, what does it matter?  We've tightened up our secuirity, right? They couldn't even get the boxcutters on the planes any more.  

If every terrorist in the world went to Afghanistan, it would be great for us, although not so good for the Afghans, and I don't wish it on them. The point is that Graham's stupid thinking is what got us to launch that catastrophic 20 year war in the first place. And, despite the horrific outcome with hundreds of thousands dead, Graham has learned nothing. He is still caught up in the same, stupid George-w-Busian mindset.   

Besides being the country that owes more money that all the other nations on Earth combined and by a wide margin, America is more: it is the land of delusions; where lessons never get learned; where the same disastrous mistakes are made over and over; where brainless blowhards like Graham get elected over and over; and though it is the 21st century, savagery and butchery are rising exponentially. In a word, this place is turning into a hell hole.